评估通过远程患者监测预防复发性糖尿病足溃疡的可能性:一项可行性研究。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Caroline A. Abbott, Kerryn J. Franklyn, David E. Stuart, Ellen Kirwan, Sinead Flynn, Ron Scott, Caroline McIntosh, Andrew J. M. Boulton
{"title":"评估通过远程患者监测预防复发性糖尿病足溃疡的可能性:一项可行性研究。","authors":"Caroline A. Abbott,&nbsp;Kerryn J. Franklyn,&nbsp;David E. Stuart,&nbsp;Ellen Kirwan,&nbsp;Sinead Flynn,&nbsp;Ron Scott,&nbsp;Caroline McIntosh,&nbsp;Andrew J. M. Boulton","doi":"10.1002/dmrr.70096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Our main aims in this study of diabetic patients at risk of foot ulcers were to evaluate: (a) adherence to the use of an at-home thermal and visual digital foot scanner, (b) the feasibility of utilising thermovisual scan data to perform remote foot assessments, thereby enabling, if indicated, remote intervention by podiatrists and (c) the validity of scanned images to identify skin lesions consistent with those found at a podiatric clinical evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this single arm, open-label, 12-week pilot study in two countries, recruited patients with previous diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) (<i>n</i> = 27) were asked to stand on a digital foot scanner (OneStep), once a day at home. Plantar thermal and visual scan data were transmitted daily to a centralised monitoring service for daily review. Any abnormalities were immediately reported to the patient's podiatric healthcare provider, who determined appropriate intervention. Primary endpoints were patient adherence, device utility and data validity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All participants with an active device (<i>n</i> = 26) took thermal and visual scans on 1547 days during 1940 active study days, averaging 5.3 ± 1.4 scans/week, with 80 ± 19% adherence (days scan recorded/days in study*100). Visual scans correctly identified all incident DFUs (<i>n</i> = 7). Podiatrists agreed that scans enabled the identification of skin integrity issues earlier than standard care (in 82% cases), finding visual scan images useful in 90% of reports and thermal data in 12%. Remote visual assessments agreed well with gold-standard podiatric examinations in identifying skin integrity risks (kappa = 0.67 [95% CI, 0.53–0.82, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]), also showing good sensitivity (80%) and specificity (100%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Remote foot scanning was easy to perform and was used consistently by vulnerable patients. Scans were useful for remote podiatric foot assessments and interventions, and visual images identified DFUs/skin problems to a good level. We now aim to test this monitoring system in a larger scale randomised controlled trial for DFU prevention.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11335,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews","volume":"41 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dmrr.70096","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Possibility of Recurrent Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention via Remote Patient Monitoring: A Feasibility Study\",\"authors\":\"Caroline A. Abbott,&nbsp;Kerryn J. Franklyn,&nbsp;David E. Stuart,&nbsp;Ellen Kirwan,&nbsp;Sinead Flynn,&nbsp;Ron Scott,&nbsp;Caroline McIntosh,&nbsp;Andrew J. M. Boulton\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dmrr.70096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our main aims in this study of diabetic patients at risk of foot ulcers were to evaluate: (a) adherence to the use of an at-home thermal and visual digital foot scanner, (b) the feasibility of utilising thermovisual scan data to perform remote foot assessments, thereby enabling, if indicated, remote intervention by podiatrists and (c) the validity of scanned images to identify skin lesions consistent with those found at a podiatric clinical evaluation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this single arm, open-label, 12-week pilot study in two countries, recruited patients with previous diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) (<i>n</i> = 27) were asked to stand on a digital foot scanner (OneStep), once a day at home. Plantar thermal and visual scan data were transmitted daily to a centralised monitoring service for daily review. Any abnormalities were immediately reported to the patient's podiatric healthcare provider, who determined appropriate intervention. Primary endpoints were patient adherence, device utility and data validity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>All participants with an active device (<i>n</i> = 26) took thermal and visual scans on 1547 days during 1940 active study days, averaging 5.3 ± 1.4 scans/week, with 80 ± 19% adherence (days scan recorded/days in study*100). Visual scans correctly identified all incident DFUs (<i>n</i> = 7). Podiatrists agreed that scans enabled the identification of skin integrity issues earlier than standard care (in 82% cases), finding visual scan images useful in 90% of reports and thermal data in 12%. Remote visual assessments agreed well with gold-standard podiatric examinations in identifying skin integrity risks (kappa = 0.67 [95% CI, 0.53–0.82, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]), also showing good sensitivity (80%) and specificity (100%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Remote foot scanning was easy to perform and was used consistently by vulnerable patients. Scans were useful for remote podiatric foot assessments and interventions, and visual images identified DFUs/skin problems to a good level. We now aim to test this monitoring system in a larger scale randomised controlled trial for DFU prevention.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"41 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dmrr.70096\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dmrr.70096\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dmrr.70096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们对有足部溃疡风险的糖尿病患者进行研究的主要目的是评估:(a)坚持使用家用热视觉数字足部扫描仪,(b)利用热视觉扫描数据进行远程足部评估的可行性,从而使足科医生能够进行远程干预,以及(c)扫描图像识别与足部临床评估中发现的皮肤病变一致的有效性。方法:在这项在两个国家进行的为期12周的单臂、开放标签的先导研究中,招募了既往患有糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)的患者(n = 27),要求他们每天在家站立一次数字足部扫描仪(OneStep)。每天将足底热和视觉扫描数据传送到中央监测服务,供每日审查。任何异常情况都立即报告给患者的足部医疗保健提供者,由他们决定适当的干预措施。主要终点为患者依从性、器械效用和数据有效性。结果:所有参与者(n = 26)在1940个积极研究日中进行了1547天的热扫描和视觉扫描,平均5.3±1.4次/周,坚持率为80±19%(扫描记录天数/研究天数*100)。视觉扫描正确识别了所有事件dfu (n = 7)。足科医生一致认为,扫描能够比标准护理更早地识别皮肤完整性问题(82%的病例),发现视觉扫描图像在90%的报告中有用,热数据在12%的报告中有用。远程视觉评估与金标准足部检查在识别皮肤完整性风险方面非常一致(kappa = 0.67 [95% CI, 0.53-0.82, p])。结论:远程足部扫描操作简单,易感患者一致使用。扫描对远程足部评估和干预很有用,视觉图像可以很好地识别DFUs/皮肤问题。我们现在的目标是在DFU预防的更大规模随机对照试验中测试该监测系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the Possibility of Recurrent Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention via Remote Patient Monitoring: A Feasibility Study

Assessing the Possibility of Recurrent Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention via Remote Patient Monitoring: A Feasibility Study

Aims

Our main aims in this study of diabetic patients at risk of foot ulcers were to evaluate: (a) adherence to the use of an at-home thermal and visual digital foot scanner, (b) the feasibility of utilising thermovisual scan data to perform remote foot assessments, thereby enabling, if indicated, remote intervention by podiatrists and (c) the validity of scanned images to identify skin lesions consistent with those found at a podiatric clinical evaluation.

Methods

In this single arm, open-label, 12-week pilot study in two countries, recruited patients with previous diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) (n = 27) were asked to stand on a digital foot scanner (OneStep), once a day at home. Plantar thermal and visual scan data were transmitted daily to a centralised monitoring service for daily review. Any abnormalities were immediately reported to the patient's podiatric healthcare provider, who determined appropriate intervention. Primary endpoints were patient adherence, device utility and data validity.

Results

All participants with an active device (n = 26) took thermal and visual scans on 1547 days during 1940 active study days, averaging 5.3 ± 1.4 scans/week, with 80 ± 19% adherence (days scan recorded/days in study*100). Visual scans correctly identified all incident DFUs (n = 7). Podiatrists agreed that scans enabled the identification of skin integrity issues earlier than standard care (in 82% cases), finding visual scan images useful in 90% of reports and thermal data in 12%. Remote visual assessments agreed well with gold-standard podiatric examinations in identifying skin integrity risks (kappa = 0.67 [95% CI, 0.53–0.82, p < 0.001]), also showing good sensitivity (80%) and specificity (100%).

Conclusions

Remote foot scanning was easy to perform and was used consistently by vulnerable patients. Scans were useful for remote podiatric foot assessments and interventions, and visual images identified DFUs/skin problems to a good level. We now aim to test this monitoring system in a larger scale randomised controlled trial for DFU prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
84
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews is a premier endocrinology and metabolism journal esteemed by clinicians and researchers alike. Encompassing a wide spectrum of topics including diabetes, endocrinology, metabolism, and obesity, the journal eagerly accepts submissions ranging from clinical studies to basic and translational research, as well as reviews exploring historical progress, controversial issues, and prominent opinions in the field. Join us in advancing knowledge and understanding in the realm of diabetes and metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信