验证用于自由放养犬基因组分析的远程唾液收集工具。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Giulia Cimarelli, Martina Lazzaroni, Clément Car, Ikhlass El Berbri, Sarah Marshall-Pescini, Małgorzata Pilot
{"title":"验证用于自由放养犬基因组分析的远程唾液收集工具。","authors":"Giulia Cimarelli, Martina Lazzaroni, Clément Car, Ikhlass El Berbri, Sarah Marshall-Pescini, Małgorzata Pilot","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-19267-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Saliva is a well-established source of DNA for various applications due to its non-invasive collection and its provision of high-quality DNA. However, its use in wild and free-ranging animal research remains limited due to challenges in collection without direct animal handling. In this study, we developed and evaluated a hands-off saliva collection method designed for free-ranging domestic dogs (FRDs), serving as a model for non-invasive genetic sampling of wildlife. Our method utilized a funnel paired with a commercially available Performagene kit (DNA Genotek, Canada), presented to the dog in the presence of an operator. The dog was free to approach and interact with the apparatus, depositing saliva while trying to reach bait. We compared DNA yield and genotyping success from samples using this hands-off method with those collected via the manufacturer's recommended method. We collected 461 saliva samples from 326 FRDs, performing 750 DNA extractions. Samples collected by hand yielded significantly higher DNA concentrations after the first extraction attempt (mean = 46.3 ng/µL) than those collected using the hands-off method (mean = 32.2 ng/µL). Despite lower DNA concentrations, genotyping success did not significantly differ between methods, demonstrating that the hands-off method can yield DNA suitable for genomic analyses. The hands-off saliva collection method is a viable alternative to invasive sampling, addressing ethical concerns and enabling genomic studies in wild animals. Furthermore, our method mitigates sampling bias toward bold individuals, a common limitation in behavioral and genetic studies of free-ranging animals. With minor adaptations, this method could be applied across various species, including more elusive ones, contributing to conservation genetics and behavioral ecology research.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"36315"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating a remote saliva collection tool for genomic analyses in free ranging dogs.\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Cimarelli, Martina Lazzaroni, Clément Car, Ikhlass El Berbri, Sarah Marshall-Pescini, Małgorzata Pilot\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-19267-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Saliva is a well-established source of DNA for various applications due to its non-invasive collection and its provision of high-quality DNA. However, its use in wild and free-ranging animal research remains limited due to challenges in collection without direct animal handling. In this study, we developed and evaluated a hands-off saliva collection method designed for free-ranging domestic dogs (FRDs), serving as a model for non-invasive genetic sampling of wildlife. Our method utilized a funnel paired with a commercially available Performagene kit (DNA Genotek, Canada), presented to the dog in the presence of an operator. The dog was free to approach and interact with the apparatus, depositing saliva while trying to reach bait. We compared DNA yield and genotyping success from samples using this hands-off method with those collected via the manufacturer's recommended method. We collected 461 saliva samples from 326 FRDs, performing 750 DNA extractions. Samples collected by hand yielded significantly higher DNA concentrations after the first extraction attempt (mean = 46.3 ng/µL) than those collected using the hands-off method (mean = 32.2 ng/µL). Despite lower DNA concentrations, genotyping success did not significantly differ between methods, demonstrating that the hands-off method can yield DNA suitable for genomic analyses. The hands-off saliva collection method is a viable alternative to invasive sampling, addressing ethical concerns and enabling genomic studies in wild animals. Furthermore, our method mitigates sampling bias toward bold individuals, a common limitation in behavioral and genetic studies of free-ranging animals. With minor adaptations, this method could be applied across various species, including more elusive ones, contributing to conservation genetics and behavioral ecology research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"36315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19267-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19267-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

唾液是一种完善的DNA来源,用于各种应用,由于其非侵入性收集和提供高质量的DNA。然而,它在野生和自由放养动物研究中的应用仍然有限,因为在没有直接处理动物的情况下收集存在挑战。在这项研究中,我们开发并评估了一种为自由放养的家狗(frd)设计的不干涉唾液采集方法,作为野生动物非侵入性基因采样的模型。我们的方法使用了一个漏斗,搭配市售的Performagene试剂盒(DNA Genotek, Canada),在操作员在场的情况下交给狗。这只狗可以自由地接近并与仪器互动,在试图够到诱饵时,它会分泌唾液。我们比较了使用这种不干涉方法和通过制造商推荐的方法收集的样品的DNA产量和基因分型成功。我们从326名frd中收集了461份唾液样本,进行了750次DNA提取。手工采集的样品在第一次提取后的DNA浓度(平均值= 46.3 ng/µL)明显高于使用不干预方法采集的样品(平均值= 32.2 ng/µL)。尽管DNA浓度较低,但不同方法之间的基因分型成功率没有显着差异,这表明不干涉方法可以产生适合基因组分析的DNA。这种无需干预的唾液采集方法是一种可行的替代侵入性采样的方法,解决了伦理问题,并使野生动物的基因组研究成为可能。此外,我们的方法减轻了对大胆个体的抽样偏差,这是在自由放养动物的行为和遗传研究中常见的限制。通过微小的调整,这种方法可以应用于各种物种,包括更难以捉摸的物种,为保护遗传学和行为生态学研究做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating a remote saliva collection tool for genomic analyses in free ranging dogs.

Saliva is a well-established source of DNA for various applications due to its non-invasive collection and its provision of high-quality DNA. However, its use in wild and free-ranging animal research remains limited due to challenges in collection without direct animal handling. In this study, we developed and evaluated a hands-off saliva collection method designed for free-ranging domestic dogs (FRDs), serving as a model for non-invasive genetic sampling of wildlife. Our method utilized a funnel paired with a commercially available Performagene kit (DNA Genotek, Canada), presented to the dog in the presence of an operator. The dog was free to approach and interact with the apparatus, depositing saliva while trying to reach bait. We compared DNA yield and genotyping success from samples using this hands-off method with those collected via the manufacturer's recommended method. We collected 461 saliva samples from 326 FRDs, performing 750 DNA extractions. Samples collected by hand yielded significantly higher DNA concentrations after the first extraction attempt (mean = 46.3 ng/µL) than those collected using the hands-off method (mean = 32.2 ng/µL). Despite lower DNA concentrations, genotyping success did not significantly differ between methods, demonstrating that the hands-off method can yield DNA suitable for genomic analyses. The hands-off saliva collection method is a viable alternative to invasive sampling, addressing ethical concerns and enabling genomic studies in wild animals. Furthermore, our method mitigates sampling bias toward bold individuals, a common limitation in behavioral and genetic studies of free-ranging animals. With minor adaptations, this method could be applied across various species, including more elusive ones, contributing to conservation genetics and behavioral ecology research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信