标签之外:AREDS2眼科补充剂的不一致性和对标准化的呼吁。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
David Beckers, David Lockington, Florian Kretz, Lena Beckers
{"title":"标签之外:AREDS2眼科补充剂的不一致性和对标准化的呼吁。","authors":"David Beckers, David Lockington, Florian Kretz, Lena Beckers","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2025.2577391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) remains a major cause of vision impairment among older adults globally. While treatment exists for the more aggressive, exudative form, options for managing nonexudative AMD are limited. One of the few interventions with scientific backing is the AREDS2 micronutrient formula, which has demonstrated an ability to slow disease progression in patients with intermediate AMD.This investigation set out to systematically assess over-the-counter supplements in the UK that are promoted for macular support, measuring how closely their contents align with the evidence-based AREDS2 formulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Products marketed as beneficial for AMD were collected and analyzed. Their labeled ingredients and dosages were directly compared with the standardized nutrient profile outlined in the AREDS2 clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that most commercially available supplements deviated markedly from the AREDS2 formula. On average, vitamin C levels were 52.3% lower than recommended, vitamin E levels were 61.2% lower, and zinc content was reduced by 40.1%. Only a small subset of products fully matched both the composition and dosage of the reference formulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight a significant gap between marketed claims and clinical evidence. Most supplements do not meet the established AREDS2 standards, potentially limiting their efficacy. Some were promoted specifically for AMD, while others used general \"macular health\" claims, adding to patient confusion. This inconsistency underscores the need for regulatory measures to enforce standardized labeling and formulation requirements to ensure informed clinical recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21702,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the Label: Inconsistencies in AREDS2 Eye Supplements and a Call for Standardisation.\",\"authors\":\"David Beckers, David Lockington, Florian Kretz, Lena Beckers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08820538.2025.2577391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) remains a major cause of vision impairment among older adults globally. While treatment exists for the more aggressive, exudative form, options for managing nonexudative AMD are limited. One of the few interventions with scientific backing is the AREDS2 micronutrient formula, which has demonstrated an ability to slow disease progression in patients with intermediate AMD.This investigation set out to systematically assess over-the-counter supplements in the UK that are promoted for macular support, measuring how closely their contents align with the evidence-based AREDS2 formulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Products marketed as beneficial for AMD were collected and analyzed. Their labeled ingredients and dosages were directly compared with the standardized nutrient profile outlined in the AREDS2 clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that most commercially available supplements deviated markedly from the AREDS2 formula. On average, vitamin C levels were 52.3% lower than recommended, vitamin E levels were 61.2% lower, and zinc content was reduced by 40.1%. Only a small subset of products fully matched both the composition and dosage of the reference formulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight a significant gap between marketed claims and clinical evidence. Most supplements do not meet the established AREDS2 standards, potentially limiting their efficacy. Some were promoted specifically for AMD, while others used general \\\"macular health\\\" claims, adding to patient confusion. This inconsistency underscores the need for regulatory measures to enforce standardized labeling and formulation requirements to ensure informed clinical recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2025.2577391\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2025.2577391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)仍然是全球老年人视力损害的主要原因。虽然有治疗更具侵袭性的渗出性AMD的方法,但治疗非渗出性AMD的方法有限。少数有科学依据的干预措施之一是AREDS2微量营养素配方,它已被证明能够减缓中度AMD患者的疾病进展。本调查旨在系统地评估英国推广的用于黄斑支持的非处方补充剂,测量其内容与循证AREDS2配方的密切程度。方法:收集和分析市场上销售的对AMD有益的产品。他们的标签成分和剂量直接与AREDS2临床试验中列出的标准化营养概况进行比较。结果:分析显示,大多数市售补充剂明显偏离AREDS2配方。平均而言,维生素C水平比推荐水平低52.3%,维生素E水平低61.2%,锌含量低40.1%。只有一小部分产品与参考配方的成分和剂量完全匹配。结论:这些发现突出了市场宣传和临床证据之间的巨大差距。大多数补充剂不符合既定的AREDS2标准,这可能会限制它们的功效。一些是专门针对AMD的,而另一些则使用一般的“黄斑健康”声明,这增加了患者的困惑。这种不一致强调了需要采取监管措施来执行标准化的标签和配方要求,以确保知情的临床建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the Label: Inconsistencies in AREDS2 Eye Supplements and a Call for Standardisation.

Purpose: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) remains a major cause of vision impairment among older adults globally. While treatment exists for the more aggressive, exudative form, options for managing nonexudative AMD are limited. One of the few interventions with scientific backing is the AREDS2 micronutrient formula, which has demonstrated an ability to slow disease progression in patients with intermediate AMD.This investigation set out to systematically assess over-the-counter supplements in the UK that are promoted for macular support, measuring how closely their contents align with the evidence-based AREDS2 formulation.

Methods: Products marketed as beneficial for AMD were collected and analyzed. Their labeled ingredients and dosages were directly compared with the standardized nutrient profile outlined in the AREDS2 clinical trials.

Results: The analysis revealed that most commercially available supplements deviated markedly from the AREDS2 formula. On average, vitamin C levels were 52.3% lower than recommended, vitamin E levels were 61.2% lower, and zinc content was reduced by 40.1%. Only a small subset of products fully matched both the composition and dosage of the reference formulation.

Conclusion: These findings highlight a significant gap between marketed claims and clinical evidence. Most supplements do not meet the established AREDS2 standards, potentially limiting their efficacy. Some were promoted specifically for AMD, while others used general "macular health" claims, adding to patient confusion. This inconsistency underscores the need for regulatory measures to enforce standardized labeling and formulation requirements to ensure informed clinical recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Ophthalmology
Seminars in Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Ophthalmology offers current, clinically oriented reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Each issue focuses on a single topic, with a primary emphasis on appropriate surgical techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信