Aurore Semeux-Bernier , Francesca Bonini , Samuel Medina Villalon , Maria Fratello , Matthieu Kowalski , Jean-Michel Badier , Frédéric Richard , Christian-George Bénar
{"title":"机器学习对癫痫脑磁图独立成分的分类。","authors":"Aurore Semeux-Bernier , Francesca Bonini , Samuel Medina Villalon , Maria Fratello , Matthieu Kowalski , Jean-Michel Badier , Frédéric Richard , Christian-George Bénar","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2111377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides valuable information for the pre-surgical assessment of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, but analysis is time-consuming and subjective. Our objective was to combine Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and machine learning to ease interpretation of MEG signals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We recorded 41 patients. Machine learning models were trained to classify independent components based on a set of 61 predefined features. In a first model, based on random forest (RF), we classified artifact components versus all others. In a second model, based on RF and logistic regression, we classified 4 classes (heart, noise, epileptic, physiological (i.e. normal brain activity)).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With the first model <del>1</del>, we obtained F1-score and balanced accuracy above 0.9. With the second model, balanced accuracy was above 0.8. Classification of epileptic component was above chance level, but with a moderate F1 score around 0.5 – with large variability across patients. Our analysis highlighted features based on spectrum, dipolarity, connectivity, kurtosis, regularity, as well as difficulties regarding spike detection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Artifact classification can be performed efficiently with a combination of ICA and random forest. Distinguishing epileptic from physiological activity is more difficult, although some features show promise as biomarkers.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Our study demonstrates both the potential and the technical limitations of ICA classification of epileptic and artifactual components.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 2111377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of magnetoencephalographic independent components in epilepsy by machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Aurore Semeux-Bernier , Francesca Bonini , Samuel Medina Villalon , Maria Fratello , Matthieu Kowalski , Jean-Michel Badier , Frédéric Richard , Christian-George Bénar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2111377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides valuable information for the pre-surgical assessment of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, but analysis is time-consuming and subjective. Our objective was to combine Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and machine learning to ease interpretation of MEG signals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We recorded 41 patients. Machine learning models were trained to classify independent components based on a set of 61 predefined features. In a first model, based on random forest (RF), we classified artifact components versus all others. In a second model, based on RF and logistic regression, we classified 4 classes (heart, noise, epileptic, physiological (i.e. normal brain activity)).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With the first model <del>1</del>, we obtained F1-score and balanced accuracy above 0.9. With the second model, balanced accuracy was above 0.8. Classification of epileptic component was above chance level, but with a moderate F1 score around 0.5 – with large variability across patients. Our analysis highlighted features based on spectrum, dipolarity, connectivity, kurtosis, regularity, as well as difficulties regarding spike detection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Artifact classification can be performed efficiently with a combination of ICA and random forest. Distinguishing epileptic from physiological activity is more difficult, although some features show promise as biomarkers.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Our study demonstrates both the potential and the technical limitations of ICA classification of epileptic and artifactual components.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"Article 2111377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725012295\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725012295","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Classification of magnetoencephalographic independent components in epilepsy by machine learning
Objective
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides valuable information for the pre-surgical assessment of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, but analysis is time-consuming and subjective. Our objective was to combine Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and machine learning to ease interpretation of MEG signals.
Methods
We recorded 41 patients. Machine learning models were trained to classify independent components based on a set of 61 predefined features. In a first model, based on random forest (RF), we classified artifact components versus all others. In a second model, based on RF and logistic regression, we classified 4 classes (heart, noise, epileptic, physiological (i.e. normal brain activity)).
Results
With the first model 1, we obtained F1-score and balanced accuracy above 0.9. With the second model, balanced accuracy was above 0.8. Classification of epileptic component was above chance level, but with a moderate F1 score around 0.5 – with large variability across patients. Our analysis highlighted features based on spectrum, dipolarity, connectivity, kurtosis, regularity, as well as difficulties regarding spike detection.
Conclusion
Artifact classification can be performed efficiently with a combination of ICA and random forest. Distinguishing epileptic from physiological activity is more difficult, although some features show promise as biomarkers.
Significance
Our study demonstrates both the potential and the technical limitations of ICA classification of epileptic and artifactual components.
期刊介绍:
As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology.
Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.