RCS-E可预测大型神经运动康复环境的预后和资源分配。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Davide Antonio Di Pietro, Adriana Olivares, Laura Comini, Alessia Saverino, Stefania De Trane, Rachele Piras, Giuliana Vezzadini, Sharon Cammisuli, Stefano Corna, Giorgio Ferriero, Francesco Negrini, Laura Marcuccio, Chiara Ferretti, Antonio Nardone, Valeria Pingue, Christian Lunetta
{"title":"RCS-E可预测大型神经运动康复环境的预后和资源分配。","authors":"Davide Antonio Di Pietro, Adriana Olivares, Laura Comini, Alessia Saverino, Stefania De Trane, Rachele Piras, Giuliana Vezzadini, Sharon Cammisuli, Stefano Corna, Giorgio Ferriero, Francesco Negrini, Laura Marcuccio, Chiara Ferretti, Antonio Nardone, Valeria Pingue, Christian Lunetta","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the reliability of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale - Extended (RCS-E) as a measure of rehabilitation complexity. Secondary outcomes include identifying which baseline data, including the RCS-E, are most predictive of rehabilitation stay effectiveness and exploring its role as a predictor of reimbursement for hospital admissions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational study. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, including Length of Stay (LoS), modified Rankin Scale, modified Barthel Index (mBI), RCS-E, and reimbursement of stay.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Study on inpatients admitted to the neuromotor Rehabilitation Units of the 16 Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS (November 2023 and June 2024).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Of 5870 hospitalizations, 4091 (mean age 71.8 ±13 years; 42.2% male) met the inclusion criteria. The pre-post analysis was performed on 3792 patients (mean age 71.8 ±12.8 years; 41.6% male).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Rehabilitation program for neurological or orthopedic condition [median (1<sup>st</sup> - 3<sup>rd</sup> quartile) duration: 27 days (20-41)] MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: RCS-E scores on admission were categorised as follows: <8 (low complexity); 8-10 (medium complexity); >10 (high complexity). For each patient, we calculated the mBI derived parameters: mBI Gain, rehabilitation efficiency, and rehabilitation effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant moderate Spearman correlation was found between RCS-E score and mBI (rho=-0.53, p<0.0001), LoS (rho=0.41, p<0.0001) and premorbid mRS (rho=0.23, p<0.0001). Rehabilitation efficiency and effectiveness were significantly lower in the high complexity group. Both RCS-E and mBI at admission significantly correlated with total reimbursement (both p<0.0001, rho=0.48 and rho=-0.43, respectively). Regression models indicated a predictive effect of RCS-E at admission on mBI at discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the reliability and utility of RCS-E in assessing neurological and orthopedic rehabilitation complexity, predicting outcomes, and informing funding models.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The RCS-E is Predictive of Outcomes and Resource Allocation in a Large Neuromotor Rehabilitation Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Davide Antonio Di Pietro, Adriana Olivares, Laura Comini, Alessia Saverino, Stefania De Trane, Rachele Piras, Giuliana Vezzadini, Sharon Cammisuli, Stefano Corna, Giorgio Ferriero, Francesco Negrini, Laura Marcuccio, Chiara Ferretti, Antonio Nardone, Valeria Pingue, Christian Lunetta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the reliability of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale - Extended (RCS-E) as a measure of rehabilitation complexity. Secondary outcomes include identifying which baseline data, including the RCS-E, are most predictive of rehabilitation stay effectiveness and exploring its role as a predictor of reimbursement for hospital admissions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational study. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, including Length of Stay (LoS), modified Rankin Scale, modified Barthel Index (mBI), RCS-E, and reimbursement of stay.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Study on inpatients admitted to the neuromotor Rehabilitation Units of the 16 Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS (November 2023 and June 2024).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Of 5870 hospitalizations, 4091 (mean age 71.8 ±13 years; 42.2% male) met the inclusion criteria. The pre-post analysis was performed on 3792 patients (mean age 71.8 ±12.8 years; 41.6% male).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Rehabilitation program for neurological or orthopedic condition [median (1<sup>st</sup> - 3<sup>rd</sup> quartile) duration: 27 days (20-41)] MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: RCS-E scores on admission were categorised as follows: <8 (low complexity); 8-10 (medium complexity); >10 (high complexity). For each patient, we calculated the mBI derived parameters: mBI Gain, rehabilitation efficiency, and rehabilitation effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant moderate Spearman correlation was found between RCS-E score and mBI (rho=-0.53, p<0.0001), LoS (rho=0.41, p<0.0001) and premorbid mRS (rho=0.23, p<0.0001). Rehabilitation efficiency and effectiveness were significantly lower in the high complexity group. Both RCS-E and mBI at admission significantly correlated with total reimbursement (both p<0.0001, rho=0.48 and rho=-0.43, respectively). Regression models indicated a predictive effect of RCS-E at admission on mBI at discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the reliability and utility of RCS-E in assessing neurological and orthopedic rehabilitation complexity, predicting outcomes, and informing funding models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.10.001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.10.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价康复复杂性扩展量表(RCS-E)作为衡量康复复杂性指标的可靠性。次要结果包括确定哪些基线数据(包括RCS-E)最能预测康复住院疗效,并探索其作为住院费用报销预测因子的作用。设计:回顾性观察性研究。收集人口学和临床变量,包括住院时间(LoS)、改良Rankin量表、改良Barthel指数(mBI)、RCS-E和住院费用报销。背景:对16所毛盖里临床科学研究所IRCCS神经运动康复病房住院患者的研究(2023年11月和2024年6月)。参与者:在5870例住院患者中,4091例(平均年龄71.8±13岁,42.2%为男性)符合纳入标准。前后分析3792例患者(平均年龄71.8±12.8岁,男性41.6%)。干预措施:神经或骨科疾病的康复计划[中位数(第1 - 3四分位数)持续时间:27天(20-41天)]主要结局和措施:入院时RCS-E评分分类如下:10(高复杂性)。对于每位患者,我们计算了mBI衍生参数:mBI增益、康复效率和康复效果。结果:RCS-E评分与mBI之间存在显著的中度Spearman相关性(rho=-0.53)。结论:本研究证明了RCS-E在评估神经和骨科康复复杂性、预测预后和为资助模型提供信息方面的可靠性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The RCS-E is Predictive of Outcomes and Resource Allocation in a Large Neuromotor Rehabilitation Setting.

Objective: To assess the reliability of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale - Extended (RCS-E) as a measure of rehabilitation complexity. Secondary outcomes include identifying which baseline data, including the RCS-E, are most predictive of rehabilitation stay effectiveness and exploring its role as a predictor of reimbursement for hospital admissions.

Design: A retrospective observational study. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, including Length of Stay (LoS), modified Rankin Scale, modified Barthel Index (mBI), RCS-E, and reimbursement of stay.

Setting: Study on inpatients admitted to the neuromotor Rehabilitation Units of the 16 Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS (November 2023 and June 2024).

Participants: Of 5870 hospitalizations, 4091 (mean age 71.8 ±13 years; 42.2% male) met the inclusion criteria. The pre-post analysis was performed on 3792 patients (mean age 71.8 ±12.8 years; 41.6% male).

Interventions: Rehabilitation program for neurological or orthopedic condition [median (1st - 3rd quartile) duration: 27 days (20-41)] MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: RCS-E scores on admission were categorised as follows: <8 (low complexity); 8-10 (medium complexity); >10 (high complexity). For each patient, we calculated the mBI derived parameters: mBI Gain, rehabilitation efficiency, and rehabilitation effectiveness.

Results: A significant moderate Spearman correlation was found between RCS-E score and mBI (rho=-0.53, p<0.0001), LoS (rho=0.41, p<0.0001) and premorbid mRS (rho=0.23, p<0.0001). Rehabilitation efficiency and effectiveness were significantly lower in the high complexity group. Both RCS-E and mBI at admission significantly correlated with total reimbursement (both p<0.0001, rho=0.48 and rho=-0.43, respectively). Regression models indicated a predictive effect of RCS-E at admission on mBI at discharge.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the reliability and utility of RCS-E in assessing neurological and orthopedic rehabilitation complexity, predicting outcomes, and informing funding models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信