混合远程康复模式对多发性硬化症患者活动能力和功能能力的影响:一项单盲随机对照研究。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Güzin Kaya Aytutuldu, Duygu Yalcınkaya, Buket Akıncı, Hikmet Uçgun, Rabia Gökçen Gözübatık Çelik, Mesude Tütüncü
{"title":"混合远程康复模式对多发性硬化症患者活动能力和功能能力的影响:一项单盲随机对照研究。","authors":"Güzin Kaya Aytutuldu, Duygu Yalcınkaya, Buket Akıncı, Hikmet Uçgun, Rabia Gökçen Gözübatık Çelik, Mesude Tütüncü","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of hybrid telerehabilitation (Hybrid TR), telerehabilitation (TR-only), and clinic-based rehabilitation on gait speed (primary outcome: Timed 25-Foot Walk Test), as well as on fatigue, functional capacity, mobility, quality of life, and muscle activation in MS patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single blind randomized controlled trial with assessments conducted at baseline, mid-treatment (week 4), and post-treatment (week 8).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rehabilitation settings included hybrid (combination of telerehabilitation and clinic-based interventions), only telerehabilitation, and clinic-based environments.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 44 participants diagnosed with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale scores ranging from 0 to 4) were randomized into three groups: Hybrid TR(Group A), TR-only(Group B), and clinic-based rehabilitation(Group C). Participants underwent an 8-week intervention program. Selection was based on specific eligibility criteria, and random allocation methods were applied.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants engaged in an 8-week program consisting of breathing exercises, aerobic training, and strengthening exercises delivered through Hybrid TR, TR-only, or clinic-based rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome was mobility assessed by the Timed 25-Foot Walk(T25FW).Secondary outcomes included functional capacity assessed by 2-Minute Walk Test(2MWT), and mobility assessed by Timed Up and Go(TUG); fatigue assessed by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale(MFIS); quality of life assessed by the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire(MusiQoL); and muscle activation measured by surface electromyography(EMG) of the rectus femoris muscle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant within-group improvements in mobility, fatigue, functional capacity, quality of life, and EMG parameters were observed by week 8 across all groups. However, statistically significant between-group differences were not observed, and effect sizes were small to moderate(η²ₚ = 0.01-0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hybrid telerehabilitation appears to be a feasible and potentially beneficial approach for individuals with multiple sclerosis, with clinical outcomes that may be comparable to those of clinic-based rehabilitation in terms of mobility, fatigue, functional capacity, quality of life, and muscle activation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a Hybrid Telerehabilitation Model on Mobility and Functional Capacity in patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Güzin Kaya Aytutuldu, Duygu Yalcınkaya, Buket Akıncı, Hikmet Uçgun, Rabia Gökçen Gözübatık Çelik, Mesude Tütüncü\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of hybrid telerehabilitation (Hybrid TR), telerehabilitation (TR-only), and clinic-based rehabilitation on gait speed (primary outcome: Timed 25-Foot Walk Test), as well as on fatigue, functional capacity, mobility, quality of life, and muscle activation in MS patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single blind randomized controlled trial with assessments conducted at baseline, mid-treatment (week 4), and post-treatment (week 8).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rehabilitation settings included hybrid (combination of telerehabilitation and clinic-based interventions), only telerehabilitation, and clinic-based environments.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 44 participants diagnosed with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale scores ranging from 0 to 4) were randomized into three groups: Hybrid TR(Group A), TR-only(Group B), and clinic-based rehabilitation(Group C). Participants underwent an 8-week intervention program. Selection was based on specific eligibility criteria, and random allocation methods were applied.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants engaged in an 8-week program consisting of breathing exercises, aerobic training, and strengthening exercises delivered through Hybrid TR, TR-only, or clinic-based rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome was mobility assessed by the Timed 25-Foot Walk(T25FW).Secondary outcomes included functional capacity assessed by 2-Minute Walk Test(2MWT), and mobility assessed by Timed Up and Go(TUG); fatigue assessed by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale(MFIS); quality of life assessed by the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire(MusiQoL); and muscle activation measured by surface electromyography(EMG) of the rectus femoris muscle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant within-group improvements in mobility, fatigue, functional capacity, quality of life, and EMG parameters were observed by week 8 across all groups. However, statistically significant between-group differences were not observed, and effect sizes were small to moderate(η²ₚ = 0.01-0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hybrid telerehabilitation appears to be a feasible and potentially beneficial approach for individuals with multiple sclerosis, with clinical outcomes that may be comparable to those of clinic-based rehabilitation in terms of mobility, fatigue, functional capacity, quality of life, and muscle activation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.034\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨混合远程康复(hybrid TR)、远程康复(TR-only)和基于临床的康复对MS患者的步速(主要指标:定时25英尺步行测试)、疲劳、功能能力、活动能力、生活质量和肌肉激活的影响。设计:单盲随机对照试验,在基线、治疗中期(第4周)和治疗后(第8周)进行评估。环境:康复环境包括混合型(远程康复和临床干预相结合)、纯远程康复和临床环境。参与者:共有44名被诊断为MS的参与者(扩展残疾状态量表评分范围从0到4)被随机分为三组:混合TR(A组),TR(B组)和临床康复(C组)。参与者接受了为期8周的干预计划。根据具体的入选标准进行筛选,采用随机分配方法。干预措施:参与者参与了一个为期8周的项目,包括呼吸练习、有氧训练和强化训练,这些训练通过混合TR、纯TR或基于临床的康复进行。主要结局指标:主要结局指标是通过计时25英尺步行(T25FW)评估活动能力。次要结果包括2分钟步行测试(2MWT)评估的功能能力,以及计时起身和行走(TUG)评估的活动能力;修正疲劳冲击量表(MFIS)评估疲劳;多发性硬化症国际生活质量问卷(musiol)评估的生活质量;以及通过股直肌表面肌电图(EMG)测量的肌肉激活。结果:到第8周,所有组在活动能力、疲劳、功能能力、生活质量和肌电参数方面均有显著改善。然而,组间差异无统计学意义,效应大小为小到中等(η²ₚ = 0.01-0.07)。结论:对于多发性硬化症患者,混合远程康复似乎是一种可行且潜在有益的方法,在活动能力、疲劳、功能能力、生活质量和肌肉激活方面,其临床结果可能与基于临床的康复相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of a Hybrid Telerehabilitation Model on Mobility and Functional Capacity in patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Study.

Objective: To investigate the effects of hybrid telerehabilitation (Hybrid TR), telerehabilitation (TR-only), and clinic-based rehabilitation on gait speed (primary outcome: Timed 25-Foot Walk Test), as well as on fatigue, functional capacity, mobility, quality of life, and muscle activation in MS patients.

Design: A single blind randomized controlled trial with assessments conducted at baseline, mid-treatment (week 4), and post-treatment (week 8).

Setting: Rehabilitation settings included hybrid (combination of telerehabilitation and clinic-based interventions), only telerehabilitation, and clinic-based environments.

Participants: A total of 44 participants diagnosed with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale scores ranging from 0 to 4) were randomized into three groups: Hybrid TR(Group A), TR-only(Group B), and clinic-based rehabilitation(Group C). Participants underwent an 8-week intervention program. Selection was based on specific eligibility criteria, and random allocation methods were applied.

Interventions: Participants engaged in an 8-week program consisting of breathing exercises, aerobic training, and strengthening exercises delivered through Hybrid TR, TR-only, or clinic-based rehabilitation.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was mobility assessed by the Timed 25-Foot Walk(T25FW).Secondary outcomes included functional capacity assessed by 2-Minute Walk Test(2MWT), and mobility assessed by Timed Up and Go(TUG); fatigue assessed by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale(MFIS); quality of life assessed by the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire(MusiQoL); and muscle activation measured by surface electromyography(EMG) of the rectus femoris muscle.

Results: Significant within-group improvements in mobility, fatigue, functional capacity, quality of life, and EMG parameters were observed by week 8 across all groups. However, statistically significant between-group differences were not observed, and effect sizes were small to moderate(η²ₚ = 0.01-0.07).

Conclusions: Hybrid telerehabilitation appears to be a feasible and potentially beneficial approach for individuals with multiple sclerosis, with clinical outcomes that may be comparable to those of clinic-based rehabilitation in terms of mobility, fatigue, functional capacity, quality of life, and muscle activation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信