{"title":"混合远程康复模式对多发性硬化症患者活动能力和功能能力的影响:一项单盲随机对照研究。","authors":"Güzin Kaya Aytutuldu, Duygu Yalcınkaya, Buket Akıncı, Hikmet Uçgun, Rabia Gökçen Gözübatık Çelik, Mesude Tütüncü","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of hybrid telerehabilitation (Hybrid TR), telerehabilitation (TR-only), and clinic-based rehabilitation on gait speed (primary outcome: Timed 25-Foot Walk Test), as well as on fatigue, functional capacity, mobility, quality of life, and muscle activation in MS patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single blind randomized controlled trial with assessments conducted at baseline, mid-treatment (week 4), and post-treatment (week 8).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rehabilitation settings included hybrid (combination of telerehabilitation and clinic-based interventions), only telerehabilitation, and clinic-based environments.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 44 participants diagnosed with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale scores ranging from 0 to 4) were randomized into three groups: Hybrid TR(Group A), TR-only(Group B), and clinic-based rehabilitation(Group C). Participants underwent an 8-week intervention program. Selection was based on specific eligibility criteria, and random allocation methods were applied.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants engaged in an 8-week program consisting of breathing exercises, aerobic training, and strengthening exercises delivered through Hybrid TR, TR-only, or clinic-based rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome was mobility assessed by the Timed 25-Foot Walk(T25FW).Secondary outcomes included functional capacity assessed by 2-Minute Walk Test(2MWT), and mobility assessed by Timed Up and Go(TUG); fatigue assessed by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale(MFIS); quality of life assessed by the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire(MusiQoL); and muscle activation measured by surface electromyography(EMG) of the rectus femoris muscle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant within-group improvements in mobility, fatigue, functional capacity, quality of life, and EMG parameters were observed by week 8 across all groups. However, statistically significant between-group differences were not observed, and effect sizes were small to moderate(η²ₚ = 0.01-0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hybrid telerehabilitation appears to be a feasible and potentially beneficial approach for individuals with multiple sclerosis, with clinical outcomes that may be comparable to those of clinic-based rehabilitation in terms of mobility, fatigue, functional capacity, quality of life, and muscle activation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a Hybrid Telerehabilitation Model on Mobility and Functional Capacity in patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Güzin Kaya Aytutuldu, Duygu Yalcınkaya, Buket Akıncı, Hikmet Uçgun, Rabia Gökçen Gözübatık Çelik, Mesude Tütüncü\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of hybrid telerehabilitation (Hybrid TR), telerehabilitation (TR-only), and clinic-based rehabilitation on gait speed (primary outcome: Timed 25-Foot Walk Test), as well as on fatigue, functional capacity, mobility, quality of life, and muscle activation in MS patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single blind randomized controlled trial with assessments conducted at baseline, mid-treatment (week 4), and post-treatment (week 8).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rehabilitation settings included hybrid (combination of telerehabilitation and clinic-based interventions), only telerehabilitation, and clinic-based environments.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 44 participants diagnosed with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale scores ranging from 0 to 4) were randomized into three groups: Hybrid TR(Group A), TR-only(Group B), and clinic-based rehabilitation(Group C). Participants underwent an 8-week intervention program. Selection was based on specific eligibility criteria, and random allocation methods were applied.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants engaged in an 8-week program consisting of breathing exercises, aerobic training, and strengthening exercises delivered through Hybrid TR, TR-only, or clinic-based rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome was mobility assessed by the Timed 25-Foot Walk(T25FW).Secondary outcomes included functional capacity assessed by 2-Minute Walk Test(2MWT), and mobility assessed by Timed Up and Go(TUG); fatigue assessed by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale(MFIS); quality of life assessed by the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire(MusiQoL); and muscle activation measured by surface electromyography(EMG) of the rectus femoris muscle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant within-group improvements in mobility, fatigue, functional capacity, quality of life, and EMG parameters were observed by week 8 across all groups. However, statistically significant between-group differences were not observed, and effect sizes were small to moderate(η²ₚ = 0.01-0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hybrid telerehabilitation appears to be a feasible and potentially beneficial approach for individuals with multiple sclerosis, with clinical outcomes that may be comparable to those of clinic-based rehabilitation in terms of mobility, fatigue, functional capacity, quality of life, and muscle activation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.034\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of a Hybrid Telerehabilitation Model on Mobility and Functional Capacity in patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Study.
Objective: To investigate the effects of hybrid telerehabilitation (Hybrid TR), telerehabilitation (TR-only), and clinic-based rehabilitation on gait speed (primary outcome: Timed 25-Foot Walk Test), as well as on fatigue, functional capacity, mobility, quality of life, and muscle activation in MS patients.
Design: A single blind randomized controlled trial with assessments conducted at baseline, mid-treatment (week 4), and post-treatment (week 8).
Setting: Rehabilitation settings included hybrid (combination of telerehabilitation and clinic-based interventions), only telerehabilitation, and clinic-based environments.
Participants: A total of 44 participants diagnosed with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale scores ranging from 0 to 4) were randomized into three groups: Hybrid TR(Group A), TR-only(Group B), and clinic-based rehabilitation(Group C). Participants underwent an 8-week intervention program. Selection was based on specific eligibility criteria, and random allocation methods were applied.
Interventions: Participants engaged in an 8-week program consisting of breathing exercises, aerobic training, and strengthening exercises delivered through Hybrid TR, TR-only, or clinic-based rehabilitation.
Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was mobility assessed by the Timed 25-Foot Walk(T25FW).Secondary outcomes included functional capacity assessed by 2-Minute Walk Test(2MWT), and mobility assessed by Timed Up and Go(TUG); fatigue assessed by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale(MFIS); quality of life assessed by the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire(MusiQoL); and muscle activation measured by surface electromyography(EMG) of the rectus femoris muscle.
Results: Significant within-group improvements in mobility, fatigue, functional capacity, quality of life, and EMG parameters were observed by week 8 across all groups. However, statistically significant between-group differences were not observed, and effect sizes were small to moderate(η²ₚ = 0.01-0.07).
Conclusions: Hybrid telerehabilitation appears to be a feasible and potentially beneficial approach for individuals with multiple sclerosis, with clinical outcomes that may be comparable to those of clinic-based rehabilitation in terms of mobility, fatigue, functional capacity, quality of life, and muscle activation.
期刊介绍:
The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities.
Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.