{"title":"人工智能对可再生能源影响的经济驱动力","authors":"Taner Akan","doi":"10.1016/j.gr.2025.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence is anticipated to make fundamental changes in the operation of economic systems. Can it have a similar impact on renewable energy consumption? This study examines this<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>research question<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>in terms of<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>AI’s indirect impact on renewable energy through the mediation of key drivers of renewable energy in<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>an economic system: firm profitability, firm value, firm competitiveness, and economic equality. The study analyzes not only the consistent (positive<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>or negative) but also the inconsistent (dark) indirect effects of AI on renewable energy, as AI is currently being incorporated into production and energy systems. The study employs recently developed ‘Pattern Causality’ analysis to estimate these effects. It uses temporal network, quadruple wavelet, and quantile wavelet analyses for the robustness check of these estimations. The study yields three conclusions. First, AI exerts positive indirect effects of 0.27, 0.75, 1.20, and 0.37 on renewable energy in Germany, Sweden, the United States, and Canada, respectively. The inconsistent<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>indirect impacts of AI are 0.06, 0.07, 0.02, and 0.07 for the corresponding countries, respectively. Second, the consistent and inconsistent<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>impacts of AI are persistent over time, despite temporal fluctuations. Third, there are no significant disparities in the magnitudes of AI’s quartile effects (0.25, 0.50, and 0.75) on renewable energy sources. The results of the temporal network, quadruple wavelet, and quantile wavelet analyses for the robustness check validate the pattern causality estimations. The study provides pertinent policy recommendations to amplify AI’s positive indirect impacts on renewable energy and to convert its inconsistent and<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>negative impacts<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>into positive impacts with specific reference to the Sustainable Development Goals.","PeriodicalId":12761,"journal":{"name":"Gondwana Research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic drivers of AI’s impact on renewable energy\",\"authors\":\"Taner Akan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gr.2025.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial intelligence is anticipated to make fundamental changes in the operation of economic systems. Can it have a similar impact on renewable energy consumption? This study examines this<ce:hsp sp=\\\"0.25\\\"></ce:hsp>research question<ce:hsp sp=\\\"0.25\\\"></ce:hsp>in terms of<ce:hsp sp=\\\"0.25\\\"></ce:hsp>AI’s indirect impact on renewable energy through the mediation of key drivers of renewable energy in<ce:hsp sp=\\\"0.25\\\"></ce:hsp>an economic system: firm profitability, firm value, firm competitiveness, and economic equality. The study analyzes not only the consistent (positive<ce:hsp sp=\\\"0.25\\\"></ce:hsp>or negative) but also the inconsistent (dark) indirect effects of AI on renewable energy, as AI is currently being incorporated into production and energy systems. The study employs recently developed ‘Pattern Causality’ analysis to estimate these effects. It uses temporal network, quadruple wavelet, and quantile wavelet analyses for the robustness check of these estimations. The study yields three conclusions. First, AI exerts positive indirect effects of 0.27, 0.75, 1.20, and 0.37 on renewable energy in Germany, Sweden, the United States, and Canada, respectively. The inconsistent<ce:hsp sp=\\\"0.25\\\"></ce:hsp>indirect impacts of AI are 0.06, 0.07, 0.02, and 0.07 for the corresponding countries, respectively. Second, the consistent and inconsistent<ce:hsp sp=\\\"0.25\\\"></ce:hsp>impacts of AI are persistent over time, despite temporal fluctuations. Third, there are no significant disparities in the magnitudes of AI’s quartile effects (0.25, 0.50, and 0.75) on renewable energy sources. The results of the temporal network, quadruple wavelet, and quantile wavelet analyses for the robustness check validate the pattern causality estimations. The study provides pertinent policy recommendations to amplify AI’s positive indirect impacts on renewable energy and to convert its inconsistent and<ce:hsp sp=\\\"0.25\\\"></ce:hsp>negative impacts<ce:hsp sp=\\\"0.25\\\"></ce:hsp>into positive impacts with specific reference to the Sustainable Development Goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gondwana Research\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gondwana Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2025.09.004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gondwana Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2025.09.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The economic drivers of AI’s impact on renewable energy
Artificial intelligence is anticipated to make fundamental changes in the operation of economic systems. Can it have a similar impact on renewable energy consumption? This study examines thisresearch questionin terms ofAI’s indirect impact on renewable energy through the mediation of key drivers of renewable energy inan economic system: firm profitability, firm value, firm competitiveness, and economic equality. The study analyzes not only the consistent (positiveor negative) but also the inconsistent (dark) indirect effects of AI on renewable energy, as AI is currently being incorporated into production and energy systems. The study employs recently developed ‘Pattern Causality’ analysis to estimate these effects. It uses temporal network, quadruple wavelet, and quantile wavelet analyses for the robustness check of these estimations. The study yields three conclusions. First, AI exerts positive indirect effects of 0.27, 0.75, 1.20, and 0.37 on renewable energy in Germany, Sweden, the United States, and Canada, respectively. The inconsistentindirect impacts of AI are 0.06, 0.07, 0.02, and 0.07 for the corresponding countries, respectively. Second, the consistent and inconsistentimpacts of AI are persistent over time, despite temporal fluctuations. Third, there are no significant disparities in the magnitudes of AI’s quartile effects (0.25, 0.50, and 0.75) on renewable energy sources. The results of the temporal network, quadruple wavelet, and quantile wavelet analyses for the robustness check validate the pattern causality estimations. The study provides pertinent policy recommendations to amplify AI’s positive indirect impacts on renewable energy and to convert its inconsistent andnegative impactsinto positive impacts with specific reference to the Sustainable Development Goals.
期刊介绍:
Gondwana Research (GR) is an International Journal aimed to promote high quality research publications on all topics related to solid Earth, particularly with reference to the origin and evolution of continents, continental assemblies and their resources. GR is an "all earth science" journal with no restrictions on geological time, terrane or theme and covers a wide spectrum of topics in geosciences such as geology, geomorphology, palaeontology, structure, petrology, geochemistry, stable isotopes, geochronology, economic geology, exploration geology, engineering geology, geophysics, and environmental geology among other themes, and provides an appropriate forum to integrate studies from different disciplines and different terrains. In addition to regular articles and thematic issues, the journal invites high profile state-of-the-art reviews on thrust area topics for its column, ''GR FOCUS''. Focus articles include short biographies and photographs of the authors. Short articles (within ten printed pages) for rapid publication reporting important discoveries or innovative models of global interest will be considered under the category ''GR LETTERS''.