通过注射器服务项目和刑事法律体系与药物使用障碍治疗的联系:一项横断面研究。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Leslie W Suen, Cariné E Megerian, Erica N Browne, Esther O Chung, Christopher F Akiba, Jason Williams, Jamie L Humphrey, Lynn D Wenger, Bradley Ray, Barrot H Lambdin, Alex H Kral
{"title":"通过注射器服务项目和刑事法律体系与药物使用障碍治疗的联系:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Leslie W Suen, Cariné E Megerian, Erica N Browne, Esther O Chung, Christopher F Akiba, Jason Williams, Jamie L Humphrey, Lynn D Wenger, Bradley Ray, Barrot H Lambdin, Alex H Kral","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence on how two approaches-syringe services programs (SSP) and criminal legal system (CLS) interventions-are associated with substance use disorder (SUD) treatment is needed to inform SUD treatment policies. This paper examines the associations between SSP utilization and CLS involvement with SUD treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study recruited 835 people who use drugs from September 2023 to September 2024 in San Francisco, California, and surveyed their substance use, medical, social, and harm reduction services utilization, and CLS involvements. Past 3-month associations between any SSP use and any CLS involvement with any SUD treatment were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 770 participants. Median [range] age was 42.5 years (19-80); 67% men, 28% women, and 5% gender-expansive; 34% Black or African American, 19% Hispanic or Latine, and 57% White. Most (78%) reported recent SSP use, and 48% reported any CLS involvement. About a quarter (27%) reported any recent SUD treatment. Multivariable analyses adjusting for age, Black race, and housing status, found that individuals with recent SSP use had higher probability of recent SUD treatment (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR] 1.77, 95% CI 1.23-2.54, p=0.002), while individuals with recent CLS involvement had similar probability of SUD treatment as those who did not (APR 1.00, 95% CI 0.78-1.28, p=0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that recent SSP use was associated with recent SUD treatment uptake, while recent CLS involvement was not. These findings underscore that SSPs remain a vital component linking people who use drugs into SUD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108150"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linkage to substance use disorder treatment through syringe services programs and the criminal legal system: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Leslie W Suen, Cariné E Megerian, Erica N Browne, Esther O Chung, Christopher F Akiba, Jason Williams, Jamie L Humphrey, Lynn D Wenger, Bradley Ray, Barrot H Lambdin, Alex H Kral\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence on how two approaches-syringe services programs (SSP) and criminal legal system (CLS) interventions-are associated with substance use disorder (SUD) treatment is needed to inform SUD treatment policies. This paper examines the associations between SSP utilization and CLS involvement with SUD treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study recruited 835 people who use drugs from September 2023 to September 2024 in San Francisco, California, and surveyed their substance use, medical, social, and harm reduction services utilization, and CLS involvements. Past 3-month associations between any SSP use and any CLS involvement with any SUD treatment were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 770 participants. Median [range] age was 42.5 years (19-80); 67% men, 28% women, and 5% gender-expansive; 34% Black or African American, 19% Hispanic or Latine, and 57% White. Most (78%) reported recent SSP use, and 48% reported any CLS involvement. About a quarter (27%) reported any recent SUD treatment. Multivariable analyses adjusting for age, Black race, and housing status, found that individuals with recent SSP use had higher probability of recent SUD treatment (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR] 1.77, 95% CI 1.23-2.54, p=0.002), while individuals with recent CLS involvement had similar probability of SUD treatment as those who did not (APR 1.00, 95% CI 0.78-1.28, p=0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that recent SSP use was associated with recent SUD treatment uptake, while recent CLS involvement was not. These findings underscore that SSPs remain a vital component linking people who use drugs into SUD treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108150\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:注射器服务计划(SSP)和刑事法律系统(CLS)干预两种方法如何与物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗相关的证据需要为SUD治疗政策提供信息。本文探讨了SSP利用与CLS参与SUD治疗之间的关系。方法:本横断面研究于2023年9月至2024年9月在加利福尼亚州旧金山招募了835名吸毒人员,调查了他们的物质使用情况、医疗、社会和减少危害服务的利用情况以及CLS参与情况。检查过去3个月任何SSP使用与任何CLS与任何SUD治疗之间的关联。结果:样本包括770名参与者。年龄中位数[范围]为42.5岁(19-80岁);67%男性,28%女性,5%性别扩张;34%是黑人或非裔美国人,19%是西班牙裔或拉丁裔,57%是白人。大多数(78%)报告最近使用SSP, 48%报告有CLS参与。约四分之一(27%)的患者报告最近接受过SUD治疗。多变量分析调整了年龄、黑人种族和住房状况,发现最近使用SSP的个体最近接受SUD治疗的概率更高(调整患病率比[APR] 1.77, 95% CI 1.23-2.54, p=0.002),而最近参与CLS的个体与未参与CLS的个体具有相似的SUD治疗概率(APR 1.00, 95% CI 0.78-1.28, p=0.99)。结论:研究结果表明,最近的SSP使用与最近的SUD治疗摄取有关,而最近的CLS参与则无关。这些发现强调,ssp仍然是将使用药物的人与SUD治疗联系起来的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linkage to substance use disorder treatment through syringe services programs and the criminal legal system: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction: Evidence on how two approaches-syringe services programs (SSP) and criminal legal system (CLS) interventions-are associated with substance use disorder (SUD) treatment is needed to inform SUD treatment policies. This paper examines the associations between SSP utilization and CLS involvement with SUD treatment.

Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 835 people who use drugs from September 2023 to September 2024 in San Francisco, California, and surveyed their substance use, medical, social, and harm reduction services utilization, and CLS involvements. Past 3-month associations between any SSP use and any CLS involvement with any SUD treatment were examined.

Results: The sample comprised 770 participants. Median [range] age was 42.5 years (19-80); 67% men, 28% women, and 5% gender-expansive; 34% Black or African American, 19% Hispanic or Latine, and 57% White. Most (78%) reported recent SSP use, and 48% reported any CLS involvement. About a quarter (27%) reported any recent SUD treatment. Multivariable analyses adjusting for age, Black race, and housing status, found that individuals with recent SSP use had higher probability of recent SUD treatment (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR] 1.77, 95% CI 1.23-2.54, p=0.002), while individuals with recent CLS involvement had similar probability of SUD treatment as those who did not (APR 1.00, 95% CI 0.78-1.28, p=0.99).

Conclusions: Findings suggest that recent SSP use was associated with recent SUD treatment uptake, while recent CLS involvement was not. These findings underscore that SSPs remain a vital component linking people who use drugs into SUD treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信