{"title":"计划和实现正畸牙齿运动和唇舌倾斜度的变化在下颌门牙非拔牙间隙封闭:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Darshan N Desai, Tony Weir, Maurice J Meade","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The study aimed to determine the center of rotation and the type of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) of the mandibular central incisors (Cis) and lateral incisors (Lis), and the efficacy of achieving planned labiolingual incisor inclination changes after nonextraction space closure (NESC) with the Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif) appliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Digital study models of initial, planned, and achieved treatment outcomes were obtained from the Invisalign treatment planning facility, ClinCheck. Vectors analogous to the long axes of the incisors were generated using Geomagic Control X (version 2022.0: 3D Systems, Cary, NC) metrology software. Intersecting vectors represented the incisors' center of rotation, whereas measurement of the vectors to a reference y-plane enabled determination of incisor labiolingual inclination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 mandibular incisors from 42 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. The achieved mean (standard deviation) OTMs were 41.4% (23.6) of those planned. Translation was the least successful OTM, with 7.6% of Cis and 8.3% of Lis translating as planned. Planned retroclination resulted in overexpression of 151% for CIs and 165% for Lis. The accuracy of planned proclination was low, with only 16.7% of CIs and 25.8% of Lis proclining as planned, whereas the remainder retroclined instead.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less than half of the planned OTM for the mandibular incisors during NESC was achieved. Planned retroclination was overexpressed, and most of planned proclination resulted in retroclination. Clinicians should consider these findings when planning NESC treatment with the Invisalign appliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planned and achieved orthodontic tooth movement and labiolingual inclination changes of mandibular incisors during nonextraction space closure with clear aligners: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Darshan N Desai, Tony Weir, Maurice J Meade\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.09.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The study aimed to determine the center of rotation and the type of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) of the mandibular central incisors (Cis) and lateral incisors (Lis), and the efficacy of achieving planned labiolingual incisor inclination changes after nonextraction space closure (NESC) with the Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif) appliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Digital study models of initial, planned, and achieved treatment outcomes were obtained from the Invisalign treatment planning facility, ClinCheck. Vectors analogous to the long axes of the incisors were generated using Geomagic Control X (version 2022.0: 3D Systems, Cary, NC) metrology software. Intersecting vectors represented the incisors' center of rotation, whereas measurement of the vectors to a reference y-plane enabled determination of incisor labiolingual inclination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 mandibular incisors from 42 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. The achieved mean (standard deviation) OTMs were 41.4% (23.6) of those planned. Translation was the least successful OTM, with 7.6% of Cis and 8.3% of Lis translating as planned. Planned retroclination resulted in overexpression of 151% for CIs and 165% for Lis. The accuracy of planned proclination was low, with only 16.7% of CIs and 25.8% of Lis proclining as planned, whereas the remainder retroclined instead.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less than half of the planned OTM for the mandibular incisors during NESC was achieved. Planned retroclination was overexpressed, and most of planned proclination resulted in retroclination. Clinicians should consider these findings when planning NESC treatment with the Invisalign appliance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.09.012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.09.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:本研究旨在确定下颌中切牙(Cis)和侧切牙(Lis)的旋转中心和正畸牙齿运动类型(OTM),以及使用Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif .)矫治器在非拔牙间隙关闭(NESC)后实现计划唇舌切牙倾斜改变的效果。方法:从Invisalign治疗计划设施ClinCheck获得初始、计划和实现治疗结果的数字研究模型。使用Geomagic Control X(版本2022.0:3D Systems, Cary, NC)计量软件生成类似于门牙长轴的矢量。交叉向量代表切牙的旋转中心,而测量向量到参考y平面可以确定切牙的唇舌倾斜度。结果:42例患者166个下颌骨切牙符合纳入标准。达到的平均(标准偏差)OTMs为计划的41.4%(23.6)。翻译是最不成功的OTM, 7.6%的ci和8.3%的li按计划翻译。计划逆行导致CIs过表达151%,Lis过表达165%。计划腹倾的准确性较低,只有16.7%的CIs和25.8%的Lis按计划腹倾,而其余的则是逆行。结论:在NESC中,只有不到一半的下颌切牙达到了计划的OTM。计划性后倾过表达,计划性后倾多数导致后倾。临床医生在计划使用Invisalign器械治疗NESC时应考虑这些结果。
Planned and achieved orthodontic tooth movement and labiolingual inclination changes of mandibular incisors during nonextraction space closure with clear aligners: A retrospective cohort study.
Introduction: The study aimed to determine the center of rotation and the type of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) of the mandibular central incisors (Cis) and lateral incisors (Lis), and the efficacy of achieving planned labiolingual incisor inclination changes after nonextraction space closure (NESC) with the Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif) appliance.
Methods: Digital study models of initial, planned, and achieved treatment outcomes were obtained from the Invisalign treatment planning facility, ClinCheck. Vectors analogous to the long axes of the incisors were generated using Geomagic Control X (version 2022.0: 3D Systems, Cary, NC) metrology software. Intersecting vectors represented the incisors' center of rotation, whereas measurement of the vectors to a reference y-plane enabled determination of incisor labiolingual inclination.
Results: A total of 166 mandibular incisors from 42 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. The achieved mean (standard deviation) OTMs were 41.4% (23.6) of those planned. Translation was the least successful OTM, with 7.6% of Cis and 8.3% of Lis translating as planned. Planned retroclination resulted in overexpression of 151% for CIs and 165% for Lis. The accuracy of planned proclination was low, with only 16.7% of CIs and 25.8% of Lis proclining as planned, whereas the remainder retroclined instead.
Conclusions: Less than half of the planned OTM for the mandibular incisors during NESC was achieved. Planned retroclination was overexpressed, and most of planned proclination resulted in retroclination. Clinicians should consider these findings when planning NESC treatment with the Invisalign appliance.
期刊介绍:
Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.