服用奥氮平对患有神经性厌食症的年轻人及其家人意味着什么?OPEN可行性试验的结果。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Rachel Rowan Olive, Vanessa Kellermann, Olena Said, Ece Sengun Filiz, Janet Treasure, Ulrike Schmidt, Jessica Bentley, Joel W T Khor, Mima Simic, Dasha Nicholls, Hubertus Himmerich, Vanessa Lawrence
{"title":"服用奥氮平对患有神经性厌食症的年轻人及其家人意味着什么?OPEN可行性试验的结果。","authors":"Rachel Rowan Olive, Vanessa Kellermann, Olena Said, Ece Sengun Filiz, Janet Treasure, Ulrike Schmidt, Jessica Bentley, Joel W T Khor, Mima Simic, Dasha Nicholls, Hubertus Himmerich, Vanessa Lawrence","doi":"10.1186/s40337-025-01401-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olanzapine is a second-generation antipsychotic medication often prescribed for young people with Anorexia Nervosa (AN), though supporting evidence is limited. The OPEN feasibility trial of olanzapine for young people (12-24 years) with AN, explored the feasibility of a future definitive trial on olanzapine in young people. Qualitative interviews examined the acceptability of olanzapine and trial design among young people with AN and their families. Here, we explore: what does taking olanzapine mean to young people with AN and their families, specifically regarding decisions to take or decline it?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve young people who agreed to take olanzapine, two who declined, and four parents took part in semi-structured qualitative interviews, which were conducted and analysed by lived-experience researchers using reflexive thematic analysis. Four young people who agreed to take olanzapine also took part in follow-up interviews, totalling 23 interviews with 16 participants. Of the interviewed parents, three had a child who consented to olanzapine and one had a child who declined. Lived-experience-led analysis, influenced by the survivor research tradition, is novel as applied to this topic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We constructed four themes: (1) Moving away from illness in contexts of desperation, moving towards recovery as broader life goals; (2) Parents and young people critically evaluate multiple information sources on olanzapine; (3) Consent versus coercion in olanzapine decision-making are determined by treatment history and clinical power dynamics; (4) Ambivalence around recovery can be heightened regarding medication. Across themes, young people and parents showed their decision-making to be careful and context-bound, factoring in: concerns around treatment delays; trusting or mistrustful relationships to clinicians or the broader system; peer experiences; and fears around recovery alongside goals for improved quality-of-life. Reported clinical conversations about weight gain did not always reflect olanzapine's evidence base. Important risks included unsupervised olanzapine cessation where wishes to stop were not accommodated clinically, and increased food restriction on starting olanzapine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Views and experiences of olanzapine are inseparable from young people's clinical and social contexts. Clinicians should consider discussing these contexts alongside medication, bearing in mind clinical encounters' complex power dynamics, and should be clear about olanzapine's association with weight gain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN80075010.</p>","PeriodicalId":48605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"13 1","pages":"228"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12533353/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What does taking olanzapine mean to young people with anorexia nervosa and their families? Findings from the OPEN feasibility trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Rowan Olive, Vanessa Kellermann, Olena Said, Ece Sengun Filiz, Janet Treasure, Ulrike Schmidt, Jessica Bentley, Joel W T Khor, Mima Simic, Dasha Nicholls, Hubertus Himmerich, Vanessa Lawrence\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40337-025-01401-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olanzapine is a second-generation antipsychotic medication often prescribed for young people with Anorexia Nervosa (AN), though supporting evidence is limited. The OPEN feasibility trial of olanzapine for young people (12-24 years) with AN, explored the feasibility of a future definitive trial on olanzapine in young people. Qualitative interviews examined the acceptability of olanzapine and trial design among young people with AN and their families. Here, we explore: what does taking olanzapine mean to young people with AN and their families, specifically regarding decisions to take or decline it?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve young people who agreed to take olanzapine, two who declined, and four parents took part in semi-structured qualitative interviews, which were conducted and analysed by lived-experience researchers using reflexive thematic analysis. Four young people who agreed to take olanzapine also took part in follow-up interviews, totalling 23 interviews with 16 participants. Of the interviewed parents, three had a child who consented to olanzapine and one had a child who declined. Lived-experience-led analysis, influenced by the survivor research tradition, is novel as applied to this topic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We constructed four themes: (1) Moving away from illness in contexts of desperation, moving towards recovery as broader life goals; (2) Parents and young people critically evaluate multiple information sources on olanzapine; (3) Consent versus coercion in olanzapine decision-making are determined by treatment history and clinical power dynamics; (4) Ambivalence around recovery can be heightened regarding medication. Across themes, young people and parents showed their decision-making to be careful and context-bound, factoring in: concerns around treatment delays; trusting or mistrustful relationships to clinicians or the broader system; peer experiences; and fears around recovery alongside goals for improved quality-of-life. Reported clinical conversations about weight gain did not always reflect olanzapine's evidence base. Important risks included unsupervised olanzapine cessation where wishes to stop were not accommodated clinically, and increased food restriction on starting olanzapine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Views and experiences of olanzapine are inseparable from young people's clinical and social contexts. Clinicians should consider discussing these contexts alongside medication, bearing in mind clinical encounters' complex power dynamics, and should be clear about olanzapine's association with weight gain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN80075010.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12533353/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-025-01401-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-025-01401-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:奥氮平是第二代抗精神病药物,常用于神经性厌食症(AN)的年轻人,但支持证据有限。奥氮平用于青年人(12-24岁)AN的OPEN可行性试验探讨了未来奥氮平在青年人中进行明确试验的可行性。定性访谈检验了青年AN患者及其家庭对奥氮平的接受程度和试验设计。在这里,我们探讨:服用奥氮平对患有AN的年轻人及其家人意味着什么,特别是关于服用或拒绝服用的决定?方法:对12名同意服用奥氮平的青少年、2名拒绝服用奥氮平的青少年和4名家长进行半结构化的定性访谈,访谈由生活经验研究者采用自反性主题分析进行分析。4名同意服用奥氮平的年轻人也参加了后续访谈,共23次访谈,16名参与者。在接受采访的父母中,有三位的孩子同意使用奥氮平,一位的孩子拒绝使用。受幸存者研究传统的影响,以生活经验为主导的分析在应用于这一主题时是新颖的。结果:我们构建了四个主题:(1)在绝望的背景下远离疾病,将康复作为更广泛的生活目标;(2)家长和年轻人对奥氮平的多种信息来源进行批判性评价;(3)奥氮平决策的同意与强迫受治疗史和临床权力动力学的影响;(4)药物治疗会加剧患者对康复的矛盾心理。在各个主题中,年轻人和父母都表明他们的决策是谨慎的,并与具体情况有关,考虑到:对治疗延误的担忧;对临床医生或更广泛系统的信任或不信任关系;同行的经验;对康复的担忧以及提高生活质量的目标。关于体重增加的临床对话报告并不总是反映奥氮平的证据基础。重要的风险包括无监督的奥氮平停药,而临床不满足停药的愿望,以及开始使用奥氮平时增加的食物限制。结论:青年人对奥氮平的看法和体验离不开其临床和社会背景。临床医生应考虑与药物一起讨论这些情况,牢记临床遇到的复杂权力动力学,并应清楚奥氮平与体重增加的关系。试验注册:ISRCTN80075010。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

What does taking olanzapine mean to young people with anorexia nervosa and their families? Findings from the OPEN feasibility trial.

What does taking olanzapine mean to young people with anorexia nervosa and their families? Findings from the OPEN feasibility trial.

Background: Olanzapine is a second-generation antipsychotic medication often prescribed for young people with Anorexia Nervosa (AN), though supporting evidence is limited. The OPEN feasibility trial of olanzapine for young people (12-24 years) with AN, explored the feasibility of a future definitive trial on olanzapine in young people. Qualitative interviews examined the acceptability of olanzapine and trial design among young people with AN and their families. Here, we explore: what does taking olanzapine mean to young people with AN and their families, specifically regarding decisions to take or decline it?

Methods: Twelve young people who agreed to take olanzapine, two who declined, and four parents took part in semi-structured qualitative interviews, which were conducted and analysed by lived-experience researchers using reflexive thematic analysis. Four young people who agreed to take olanzapine also took part in follow-up interviews, totalling 23 interviews with 16 participants. Of the interviewed parents, three had a child who consented to olanzapine and one had a child who declined. Lived-experience-led analysis, influenced by the survivor research tradition, is novel as applied to this topic.

Results: We constructed four themes: (1) Moving away from illness in contexts of desperation, moving towards recovery as broader life goals; (2) Parents and young people critically evaluate multiple information sources on olanzapine; (3) Consent versus coercion in olanzapine decision-making are determined by treatment history and clinical power dynamics; (4) Ambivalence around recovery can be heightened regarding medication. Across themes, young people and parents showed their decision-making to be careful and context-bound, factoring in: concerns around treatment delays; trusting or mistrustful relationships to clinicians or the broader system; peer experiences; and fears around recovery alongside goals for improved quality-of-life. Reported clinical conversations about weight gain did not always reflect olanzapine's evidence base. Important risks included unsupervised olanzapine cessation where wishes to stop were not accommodated clinically, and increased food restriction on starting olanzapine.

Conclusions: Views and experiences of olanzapine are inseparable from young people's clinical and social contexts. Clinicians should consider discussing these contexts alongside medication, bearing in mind clinical encounters' complex power dynamics, and should be clear about olanzapine's association with weight gain.

Trial registration: ISRCTN80075010.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Eating Disorders
Journal of Eating Disorders Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
17.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Eating Disorders is the first open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders. It disseminates research that provides answers to the important issues and key challenges in the field of eating disorders and to facilitate translation of evidence into practice. The journal publishes research on all aspects of eating disorders namely their epidemiology, nature, determinants, neurobiology, prevention, treatment and outcomes. The scope includes, but is not limited to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other eating disorders. Related areas such as important co-morbidities, obesity, body image, appetite, food and eating are also included. Articles about research methodology and assessment are welcomed where they advance the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信