《作为无主之地的人类生活:Facebook基础技术中的社会盲工程》

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-14 DOI:10.1007/s13347-025-00971-9
João C Magalhães, Nick Couldry
{"title":"《作为无主之地的人类生活:Facebook基础技术中的社会盲工程》","authors":"João C Magalhães, Nick Couldry","doi":"10.1007/s13347-025-00971-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critical platform scholars have long suggested, if indirectly, that social media power is somehow akin to social engineering. This article argues that the parallel is analytically productive, but for reasons that are more complex than has previously been appreciated. By examining Facebook's foundational technologies, as described in patents that sought to protect the company's early innovations, we argue that, unlike previous technocratic attempts to reconstruct society, the platform's equally consequential rendering of social reality into a legible and controllable social graph involved no substantive vision of the social world at all. Rather, the company engaged in a form of <i>socially blind engineering</i>, misrecognizing the actual social world as a <i>terra nullius</i>, as if it had no inhabitants who needed to be taken into account, and so was a domain from which profit could be extracted with relative impunity. In so doing, we develop a conceptual vocabulary to understand the widely-criticised recklessness that, notwithstanding some more charitable recent readings, marked the early Facebook - and that might still influence the tech sector as a whole.</p>","PeriodicalId":39065,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Technology","volume":"38 4","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12521260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Life as <i>Terra Nullius</i>: Socially Blind Engineering in Facebook's Foundational Technologies.\",\"authors\":\"João C Magalhães, Nick Couldry\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13347-025-00971-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Critical platform scholars have long suggested, if indirectly, that social media power is somehow akin to social engineering. This article argues that the parallel is analytically productive, but for reasons that are more complex than has previously been appreciated. By examining Facebook's foundational technologies, as described in patents that sought to protect the company's early innovations, we argue that, unlike previous technocratic attempts to reconstruct society, the platform's equally consequential rendering of social reality into a legible and controllable social graph involved no substantive vision of the social world at all. Rather, the company engaged in a form of <i>socially blind engineering</i>, misrecognizing the actual social world as a <i>terra nullius</i>, as if it had no inhabitants who needed to be taken into account, and so was a domain from which profit could be extracted with relative impunity. In so doing, we develop a conceptual vocabulary to understand the widely-criticised recklessness that, notwithstanding some more charitable recent readings, marked the early Facebook - and that might still influence the tech sector as a whole.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12521260/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00971-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00971-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,批判平台的学者们一直间接地认为,社交媒体的力量在某种程度上类似于社会工程。这篇文章认为,并行分析是有效的,但原因比以前所理解的要复杂得多。通过研究Facebook的基础技术,正如专利中所描述的那样,旨在保护公司的早期创新,我们认为,与以前技术官僚试图重建社会不同,该平台同样重要的将社会现实呈现为可读和可控的社会图谱,根本没有涉及社会世界的实质性愿景。相反,该公司从事某种形式的社会盲目工程,错误地将实际的社会世界视为无主之地(terra nullius),就好像它没有需要考虑的居民,因此是一个可以相对不受惩罚地从中提取利润的领域。在这样做的过程中,我们开发了一个概念性的词汇来理解被广泛批评的鲁莽行为,尽管最近有一些更仁慈的解读,但这种鲁莽行为标志着早期的Facebook——这可能仍会影响整个科技行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Life as Terra Nullius: Socially Blind Engineering in Facebook's Foundational Technologies.

Critical platform scholars have long suggested, if indirectly, that social media power is somehow akin to social engineering. This article argues that the parallel is analytically productive, but for reasons that are more complex than has previously been appreciated. By examining Facebook's foundational technologies, as described in patents that sought to protect the company's early innovations, we argue that, unlike previous technocratic attempts to reconstruct society, the platform's equally consequential rendering of social reality into a legible and controllable social graph involved no substantive vision of the social world at all. Rather, the company engaged in a form of socially blind engineering, misrecognizing the actual social world as a terra nullius, as if it had no inhabitants who needed to be taken into account, and so was a domain from which profit could be extracted with relative impunity. In so doing, we develop a conceptual vocabulary to understand the widely-criticised recklessness that, notwithstanding some more charitable recent readings, marked the early Facebook - and that might still influence the tech sector as a whole.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophy and Technology
Philosophy and Technology Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信