{"title":"基于医院的大规模伤亡事件分类工具综述。","authors":"Sarah S Abdul-Nabi, Eveline Hitti","doi":"10.4103/tjem.tjem_77_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) pose significant challenges to the healthcare systems, particularly in low-and lower-middle-income countries where prehospital triage is often limited, and hospitals face sudden surges of casualties. While triage tools have been widely studied for field use, their effectiveness in hospital-based MCI response remains unclear. This review examines peer-reviewed studies on hospital-based triage tools used during mass casualties, focusing on their accuracy and applicability. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE identified six relevant studies, conducted across various income settings and utilizing different methodologies, including simulation-based research, retrospective analyses, and real-world debriefings. Several tools were assessed, including Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment, the Modified CareFlight system, and homegrown triage models developed in Berlin and Iran. While some tools showed potential in prioritizing critically ill patients and managing resource allocation, their application in the real-world hospital settings remains insufficiently studied. Existing research is limited by small sample sizes, reliance on simulations, and a lack of validation in live MCI scenarios. Given these gaps, further research is essential to evaluate triage models in real-time, high-volume, and resource-limited environments to ensure effective hospital-based mass-casualty response.</p>","PeriodicalId":46536,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 4","pages":"251-255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of mass casualty incident triage tools for hospital-based triage.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah S Abdul-Nabi, Eveline Hitti\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tjem.tjem_77_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) pose significant challenges to the healthcare systems, particularly in low-and lower-middle-income countries where prehospital triage is often limited, and hospitals face sudden surges of casualties. While triage tools have been widely studied for field use, their effectiveness in hospital-based MCI response remains unclear. This review examines peer-reviewed studies on hospital-based triage tools used during mass casualties, focusing on their accuracy and applicability. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE identified six relevant studies, conducted across various income settings and utilizing different methodologies, including simulation-based research, retrospective analyses, and real-world debriefings. Several tools were assessed, including Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment, the Modified CareFlight system, and homegrown triage models developed in Berlin and Iran. While some tools showed potential in prioritizing critically ill patients and managing resource allocation, their application in the real-world hospital settings remains insufficiently studied. Existing research is limited by small sample sizes, reliance on simulations, and a lack of validation in live MCI scenarios. Given these gaps, further research is essential to evaluate triage models in real-time, high-volume, and resource-limited environments to ensure effective hospital-based mass-casualty response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"251-255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjem.tjem_77_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjem.tjem_77_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A review of mass casualty incident triage tools for hospital-based triage.
Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) pose significant challenges to the healthcare systems, particularly in low-and lower-middle-income countries where prehospital triage is often limited, and hospitals face sudden surges of casualties. While triage tools have been widely studied for field use, their effectiveness in hospital-based MCI response remains unclear. This review examines peer-reviewed studies on hospital-based triage tools used during mass casualties, focusing on their accuracy and applicability. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE identified six relevant studies, conducted across various income settings and utilizing different methodologies, including simulation-based research, retrospective analyses, and real-world debriefings. Several tools were assessed, including Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment, the Modified CareFlight system, and homegrown triage models developed in Berlin and Iran. While some tools showed potential in prioritizing critically ill patients and managing resource allocation, their application in the real-world hospital settings remains insufficiently studied. Existing research is limited by small sample sizes, reliance on simulations, and a lack of validation in live MCI scenarios. Given these gaps, further research is essential to evaluate triage models in real-time, high-volume, and resource-limited environments to ensure effective hospital-based mass-casualty response.
期刊介绍:
The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine (Turk J Emerg Med) is an International, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes clinical and experimental trials, case reports, invited reviews, case images, letters to the Editor, and interesting research conducted in all fields of Emergency Medicine. The Journal is the official scientific publication of the Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey (EMAT) and is printed four times a year, in January, April, July and October. The language of the journal is English. The Journal is based on independent and unbiased double-blinded peer-reviewed principles. Only unpublished papers that are not under review for publication elsewhere can be submitted. The authors are responsible for the scientific content of the material to be published. The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine reserves the right to request any research materials on which the paper is based. The Editorial Board of the Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine and the Publisher adheres to the principles of the International Council of Medical Journal Editors, the World Association of Medical Editors, the Council of Science Editors, the Committee on Publication Ethics, the US National Library of Medicine, the US Office of Research Integrity, the European Association of Science Editors, and the International Society of Managing and Technical Editors.