帕金森氏病患者与健康对照者身体各部分内隐运动学习的评估。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Matteo Rizzo, Paola Ortelli, Alberto Bottari, Alessandra Scarton, Federica Bombieri, Mirta Fiorio, Luca Sebastianelli, Davide Ferrazzoli, Silvia Pogliaghi
{"title":"帕金森氏病患者与健康对照者身体各部分内隐运动学习的评估。","authors":"Matteo Rizzo, Paola Ortelli, Alberto Bottari, Alessandra Scarton, Federica Bombieri, Mirta Fiorio, Luca Sebastianelli, Davide Ferrazzoli, Silvia Pogliaghi","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-21321-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alterations in motor learning are associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Possible body segment-specificity remains unexplored and could have practical implications for testing and rehabilitation. Our aim was to investigate sequence-specific implicit motor learning differences in alternative task movements in people with early stages PD vs. age-matched healthy controls (HCs). Thirty participants with PD (67.6 ± 8.0 yrs, 1.9 ± 0.7 H&Y) and 30 HC (69.6 ± 5.2 yrs) performed three Serial Reaction Time Tasks (SRTTs), which differed for the body segment used to perform it: Hands, Arms, and Feet testing. Visual-motor reaction time was recorded in response to visual stimuli. For each task, eight blocks, each consisting of 4 repetitions of a 12-stimuli sequence, were presented: random sequence order was practiced in block one and eight (R1, R8); a fixed 12-stimuli sequence order was performed in blocks from 2 to 7 (S2-S7). Reaction Times were corrected for errors (RT) and reprocessed as percentage values, where the mean RT of R1 represented 100% (RT<sub>R1</sub>%). RT at R1 (RT<sub>R1</sub>), overall RT (RT<sub>global</sub>) and the magnitude of implicit motor learning (<sub>i</sub>ML, calculated as % difference between R8 and S7) were compared among body segments and PD vs. HCs groups by mixed two-way RM-ANOVA. The learning responses (RT<sub>R1-R8</sub>Curve) and the errors curves were compared among body segments, groups and blocks (R1, R8 and S2-S7) by mixed three-way RM-ANOVA. While PD patients showed the characteristic bradykinesia, our data indicate that they are able to gain an identical sequence-specific implicit motor learning magnitude, with a similar timing, compared to HCs. Moreover, the magnitude and timing of the learning response is consistent across different body segments. This suggests that SRTT, conducted with different body segments, could be considered a valuable tool for studying motor learning in PD and HCs in neurorehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"36287"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12532993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of implicit motor learning across body segments in Parkinson's disease vs. healthy controls.\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Rizzo, Paola Ortelli, Alberto Bottari, Alessandra Scarton, Federica Bombieri, Mirta Fiorio, Luca Sebastianelli, Davide Ferrazzoli, Silvia Pogliaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-21321-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Alterations in motor learning are associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Possible body segment-specificity remains unexplored and could have practical implications for testing and rehabilitation. Our aim was to investigate sequence-specific implicit motor learning differences in alternative task movements in people with early stages PD vs. age-matched healthy controls (HCs). Thirty participants with PD (67.6 ± 8.0 yrs, 1.9 ± 0.7 H&Y) and 30 HC (69.6 ± 5.2 yrs) performed three Serial Reaction Time Tasks (SRTTs), which differed for the body segment used to perform it: Hands, Arms, and Feet testing. Visual-motor reaction time was recorded in response to visual stimuli. For each task, eight blocks, each consisting of 4 repetitions of a 12-stimuli sequence, were presented: random sequence order was practiced in block one and eight (R1, R8); a fixed 12-stimuli sequence order was performed in blocks from 2 to 7 (S2-S7). Reaction Times were corrected for errors (RT) and reprocessed as percentage values, where the mean RT of R1 represented 100% (RT<sub>R1</sub>%). RT at R1 (RT<sub>R1</sub>), overall RT (RT<sub>global</sub>) and the magnitude of implicit motor learning (<sub>i</sub>ML, calculated as % difference between R8 and S7) were compared among body segments and PD vs. HCs groups by mixed two-way RM-ANOVA. The learning responses (RT<sub>R1-R8</sub>Curve) and the errors curves were compared among body segments, groups and blocks (R1, R8 and S2-S7) by mixed three-way RM-ANOVA. While PD patients showed the characteristic bradykinesia, our data indicate that they are able to gain an identical sequence-specific implicit motor learning magnitude, with a similar timing, compared to HCs. Moreover, the magnitude and timing of the learning response is consistent across different body segments. This suggests that SRTT, conducted with different body segments, could be considered a valuable tool for studying motor learning in PD and HCs in neurorehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"36287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12532993/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21321-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21321-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动学习的改变与帕金森病(PD)有关。可能的身体节段特异性仍未探索,可能对测试和康复有实际意义。我们的目的是研究早期PD患者与年龄匹配的健康对照(hc)在替代任务运动中序列特异性内隐运动学习的差异。30名PD患者(67.6±8.0岁,1.9±0.7 H&Y)和30名HC患者(69.6±5.2岁)执行了三个系列反应时间任务(srtt),用于执行该任务的身体部位不同:手,手臂和脚测试。记录视觉运动对视觉刺激的反应时间。对于每个任务,提供8个模块,每个模块由12个刺激序列的4次重复组成:在模块1和8 (R1, R8)中练习随机序列顺序;固定的12个刺激序列顺序在第2至第7组(S2-S7)中进行。对反应时间进行误差校正(RT)并重新处理为百分比值,其中R1的平均RT代表100% (RTR1%)。通过混合双向RM-ANOVA比较身体部分组和PD组与hcc组的R1 RT (RTR1),总RT (RTglobal)和内隐运动学习的大小(iML,以R8和S7之间的差异百分比计算)。采用混合三向RM-ANOVA方法比较不同身体段、组和块(R1、R8和S2-S7)的学习反应(RTR1-R8Curve)和误差曲线。虽然PD患者表现出特征性的运动迟缓,但我们的数据表明,与hc相比,他们能够获得相同的序列特异性内隐运动学习量,时间相似。此外,学习反应的大小和时间在不同的身体部位是一致的。这表明,SRTT可以被认为是研究PD和hc在神经康复中的运动学习的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of implicit motor learning across body segments in Parkinson's disease vs. healthy controls.

Evaluation of implicit motor learning across body segments in Parkinson's disease vs. healthy controls.

Evaluation of implicit motor learning across body segments in Parkinson's disease vs. healthy controls.

Evaluation of implicit motor learning across body segments in Parkinson's disease vs. healthy controls.

Alterations in motor learning are associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Possible body segment-specificity remains unexplored and could have practical implications for testing and rehabilitation. Our aim was to investigate sequence-specific implicit motor learning differences in alternative task movements in people with early stages PD vs. age-matched healthy controls (HCs). Thirty participants with PD (67.6 ± 8.0 yrs, 1.9 ± 0.7 H&Y) and 30 HC (69.6 ± 5.2 yrs) performed three Serial Reaction Time Tasks (SRTTs), which differed for the body segment used to perform it: Hands, Arms, and Feet testing. Visual-motor reaction time was recorded in response to visual stimuli. For each task, eight blocks, each consisting of 4 repetitions of a 12-stimuli sequence, were presented: random sequence order was practiced in block one and eight (R1, R8); a fixed 12-stimuli sequence order was performed in blocks from 2 to 7 (S2-S7). Reaction Times were corrected for errors (RT) and reprocessed as percentage values, where the mean RT of R1 represented 100% (RTR1%). RT at R1 (RTR1), overall RT (RTglobal) and the magnitude of implicit motor learning (iML, calculated as % difference between R8 and S7) were compared among body segments and PD vs. HCs groups by mixed two-way RM-ANOVA. The learning responses (RTR1-R8Curve) and the errors curves were compared among body segments, groups and blocks (R1, R8 and S2-S7) by mixed three-way RM-ANOVA. While PD patients showed the characteristic bradykinesia, our data indicate that they are able to gain an identical sequence-specific implicit motor learning magnitude, with a similar timing, compared to HCs. Moreover, the magnitude and timing of the learning response is consistent across different body segments. This suggests that SRTT, conducted with different body segments, could be considered a valuable tool for studying motor learning in PD and HCs in neurorehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信