K Chikh, J Burel, A Nikiema, H Bulteau, D Maltete, D Wallon, E Gerardin, R Aboukais, T Gaberel, S Derrey, L Grangeon
{"title":"脑淀粉样血管病相关脑出血的手术疗效:多中心比较研究。","authors":"K Chikh, J Burel, A Nikiema, H Bulteau, D Maltete, D Wallon, E Gerardin, R Aboukais, T Gaberel, S Derrey, L Grangeon","doi":"10.1016/j.neurol.2025.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery for lobar intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH) associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is believed to carry a high risk of postoperative rebleeding. The diagnosis of CAA is increasing with an aging population and external validation of the Edinburgh criteria on computed tomography (CT) scans. The aim of this study was to assess the postoperative risk of CAA-related ICH compared to non-CAA-related ICH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients admitted between 2008 and 2022 for spontaneous lobar ICH who underwent surgery at three university hospitals. A single-blinded neuroradiologist analyzed the Edinburgh criteria on the initial CT scan before surgery and assessed rebleeding on a repeat CT scan performed within 48hours after surgery. Patients were classified into the \"CAA group\" according to the Edinburgh or Boston criteria, and into the \"non-CAA group\" if they had another cause of ICH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 patients were included, with 23 in the CAA group, 93 in the non-CAA group, and 24 in the undetermined group. The postoperative rebleeding rate at 24-48hours did not differ significantly between groups (13% in the CAA group vs. 15% in the non-CAA group, P>0.99). The overall rate of rebleeding associated with clinical deterioration did not differ between groups (9% in the CAA group vs. 6% in the non-CAA group, P=0.66). The overall mortality rate during the acute phase did not significantly differ between groups (4% in the CAA group vs. 12% in the non-CAA group, P=0.46). The modified Rankin scale score three months after discharge ranged from 0 to 3 for 63% of CAA patients compared to 53% of non-CAA patients, with no significant difference (P=0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not find a significant difference in the postoperative rebleeding rate after ICH associated with CAA compared to other causes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21321,"journal":{"name":"Revue neurologique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical outcome of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related cerebral hemorrhage-A multicenter comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"K Chikh, J Burel, A Nikiema, H Bulteau, D Maltete, D Wallon, E Gerardin, R Aboukais, T Gaberel, S Derrey, L Grangeon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurol.2025.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery for lobar intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH) associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is believed to carry a high risk of postoperative rebleeding. The diagnosis of CAA is increasing with an aging population and external validation of the Edinburgh criteria on computed tomography (CT) scans. The aim of this study was to assess the postoperative risk of CAA-related ICH compared to non-CAA-related ICH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients admitted between 2008 and 2022 for spontaneous lobar ICH who underwent surgery at three university hospitals. A single-blinded neuroradiologist analyzed the Edinburgh criteria on the initial CT scan before surgery and assessed rebleeding on a repeat CT scan performed within 48hours after surgery. Patients were classified into the \\\"CAA group\\\" according to the Edinburgh or Boston criteria, and into the \\\"non-CAA group\\\" if they had another cause of ICH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 patients were included, with 23 in the CAA group, 93 in the non-CAA group, and 24 in the undetermined group. The postoperative rebleeding rate at 24-48hours did not differ significantly between groups (13% in the CAA group vs. 15% in the non-CAA group, P>0.99). The overall rate of rebleeding associated with clinical deterioration did not differ between groups (9% in the CAA group vs. 6% in the non-CAA group, P=0.66). The overall mortality rate during the acute phase did not significantly differ between groups (4% in the CAA group vs. 12% in the non-CAA group, P=0.46). The modified Rankin scale score three months after discharge ranged from 0 to 3 for 63% of CAA patients compared to 53% of non-CAA patients, with no significant difference (P=0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not find a significant difference in the postoperative rebleeding rate after ICH associated with CAA compared to other causes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue neurologique\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue neurologique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2025.09.006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue neurologique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2025.09.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Surgery for lobar intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH) associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is believed to carry a high risk of postoperative rebleeding. The diagnosis of CAA is increasing with an aging population and external validation of the Edinburgh criteria on computed tomography (CT) scans. The aim of this study was to assess the postoperative risk of CAA-related ICH compared to non-CAA-related ICH.
Methods: We included patients admitted between 2008 and 2022 for spontaneous lobar ICH who underwent surgery at three university hospitals. A single-blinded neuroradiologist analyzed the Edinburgh criteria on the initial CT scan before surgery and assessed rebleeding on a repeat CT scan performed within 48hours after surgery. Patients were classified into the "CAA group" according to the Edinburgh or Boston criteria, and into the "non-CAA group" if they had another cause of ICH.
Results: A total of 140 patients were included, with 23 in the CAA group, 93 in the non-CAA group, and 24 in the undetermined group. The postoperative rebleeding rate at 24-48hours did not differ significantly between groups (13% in the CAA group vs. 15% in the non-CAA group, P>0.99). The overall rate of rebleeding associated with clinical deterioration did not differ between groups (9% in the CAA group vs. 6% in the non-CAA group, P=0.66). The overall mortality rate during the acute phase did not significantly differ between groups (4% in the CAA group vs. 12% in the non-CAA group, P=0.46). The modified Rankin scale score three months after discharge ranged from 0 to 3 for 63% of CAA patients compared to 53% of non-CAA patients, with no significant difference (P=0.59).
Conclusion: We did not find a significant difference in the postoperative rebleeding rate after ICH associated with CAA compared to other causes.
期刊介绍:
The first issue of the Revue Neurologique, featuring an original article by Jean-Martin Charcot, was published on February 28th, 1893. Six years later, the French Society of Neurology (SFN) adopted this journal as its official publication in the year of its foundation, 1899.
The Revue Neurologique was published throughout the 20th century without interruption and is indexed in all international databases (including Current Contents, Pubmed, Scopus). Ten annual issues provide original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, and review articles giving up-to-date insights in all areas of neurology. The Revue Neurologique also publishes guidelines and recommendations.
The Revue Neurologique publishes original articles, brief reports, general reviews, editorials, and letters to the editor as well as correspondence concerning articles previously published in the journal in the correspondence column.