脑淀粉样血管病相关脑出血的手术疗效:多中心比较研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
K Chikh, J Burel, A Nikiema, H Bulteau, D Maltete, D Wallon, E Gerardin, R Aboukais, T Gaberel, S Derrey, L Grangeon
{"title":"脑淀粉样血管病相关脑出血的手术疗效:多中心比较研究。","authors":"K Chikh, J Burel, A Nikiema, H Bulteau, D Maltete, D Wallon, E Gerardin, R Aboukais, T Gaberel, S Derrey, L Grangeon","doi":"10.1016/j.neurol.2025.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery for lobar intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH) associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is believed to carry a high risk of postoperative rebleeding. The diagnosis of CAA is increasing with an aging population and external validation of the Edinburgh criteria on computed tomography (CT) scans. The aim of this study was to assess the postoperative risk of CAA-related ICH compared to non-CAA-related ICH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients admitted between 2008 and 2022 for spontaneous lobar ICH who underwent surgery at three university hospitals. A single-blinded neuroradiologist analyzed the Edinburgh criteria on the initial CT scan before surgery and assessed rebleeding on a repeat CT scan performed within 48hours after surgery. Patients were classified into the \"CAA group\" according to the Edinburgh or Boston criteria, and into the \"non-CAA group\" if they had another cause of ICH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 patients were included, with 23 in the CAA group, 93 in the non-CAA group, and 24 in the undetermined group. The postoperative rebleeding rate at 24-48hours did not differ significantly between groups (13% in the CAA group vs. 15% in the non-CAA group, P>0.99). The overall rate of rebleeding associated with clinical deterioration did not differ between groups (9% in the CAA group vs. 6% in the non-CAA group, P=0.66). The overall mortality rate during the acute phase did not significantly differ between groups (4% in the CAA group vs. 12% in the non-CAA group, P=0.46). The modified Rankin scale score three months after discharge ranged from 0 to 3 for 63% of CAA patients compared to 53% of non-CAA patients, with no significant difference (P=0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not find a significant difference in the postoperative rebleeding rate after ICH associated with CAA compared to other causes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21321,"journal":{"name":"Revue neurologique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical outcome of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related cerebral hemorrhage-A multicenter comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"K Chikh, J Burel, A Nikiema, H Bulteau, D Maltete, D Wallon, E Gerardin, R Aboukais, T Gaberel, S Derrey, L Grangeon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurol.2025.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery for lobar intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH) associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is believed to carry a high risk of postoperative rebleeding. The diagnosis of CAA is increasing with an aging population and external validation of the Edinburgh criteria on computed tomography (CT) scans. The aim of this study was to assess the postoperative risk of CAA-related ICH compared to non-CAA-related ICH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients admitted between 2008 and 2022 for spontaneous lobar ICH who underwent surgery at three university hospitals. A single-blinded neuroradiologist analyzed the Edinburgh criteria on the initial CT scan before surgery and assessed rebleeding on a repeat CT scan performed within 48hours after surgery. Patients were classified into the \\\"CAA group\\\" according to the Edinburgh or Boston criteria, and into the \\\"non-CAA group\\\" if they had another cause of ICH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 patients were included, with 23 in the CAA group, 93 in the non-CAA group, and 24 in the undetermined group. The postoperative rebleeding rate at 24-48hours did not differ significantly between groups (13% in the CAA group vs. 15% in the non-CAA group, P>0.99). The overall rate of rebleeding associated with clinical deterioration did not differ between groups (9% in the CAA group vs. 6% in the non-CAA group, P=0.66). The overall mortality rate during the acute phase did not significantly differ between groups (4% in the CAA group vs. 12% in the non-CAA group, P=0.46). The modified Rankin scale score three months after discharge ranged from 0 to 3 for 63% of CAA patients compared to 53% of non-CAA patients, with no significant difference (P=0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not find a significant difference in the postoperative rebleeding rate after ICH associated with CAA compared to other causes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue neurologique\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue neurologique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2025.09.006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue neurologique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2025.09.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大叶性脑出血(ICH)合并脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)的手术被认为具有术后再出血的高风险。随着人口老龄化和计算机断层扫描(CT)的爱丁堡标准的外部验证,CAA的诊断正在增加。本研究的目的是评估caa相关性脑出血与非caa相关性脑出血的术后风险。方法:我们纳入了2008年至2022年间在三所大学医院接受手术的自发性大叶性脑出血患者。一名单盲神经放射学家分析了术前初次CT扫描的爱丁堡标准,并评估了术后48小时内重复CT扫描的再出血情况。根据爱丁堡或波士顿标准将患者分为“CAA组”,如果患者有其他原因导致脑出血,则分为“非CAA组”。结果:共纳入140例患者,其中CAA组23例,非CAA组93例,待定组24例。术后24-48h再出血率组间无显著差异(CAA组13% vs.非CAA组15%,P < 0.99)。与临床恶化相关的总再出血率在两组之间没有差异(CAA组为9%,非CAA组为6%,P=0.66)。急性期的总死亡率在两组间无显著差异(CAA组为4%,非CAA组为12%,P=0.46)。63%的CAA患者与53%的非CAA患者在出院后3个月的改良Rankin量表评分范围为0 ~ 3分,差异无统计学意义(P=0.59)。结论:与其他原因相比,我们没有发现与CAA相关的脑出血术后再出血率有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical outcome of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related cerebral hemorrhage-A multicenter comparative study.

Background: Surgery for lobar intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH) associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is believed to carry a high risk of postoperative rebleeding. The diagnosis of CAA is increasing with an aging population and external validation of the Edinburgh criteria on computed tomography (CT) scans. The aim of this study was to assess the postoperative risk of CAA-related ICH compared to non-CAA-related ICH.

Methods: We included patients admitted between 2008 and 2022 for spontaneous lobar ICH who underwent surgery at three university hospitals. A single-blinded neuroradiologist analyzed the Edinburgh criteria on the initial CT scan before surgery and assessed rebleeding on a repeat CT scan performed within 48hours after surgery. Patients were classified into the "CAA group" according to the Edinburgh or Boston criteria, and into the "non-CAA group" if they had another cause of ICH.

Results: A total of 140 patients were included, with 23 in the CAA group, 93 in the non-CAA group, and 24 in the undetermined group. The postoperative rebleeding rate at 24-48hours did not differ significantly between groups (13% in the CAA group vs. 15% in the non-CAA group, P>0.99). The overall rate of rebleeding associated with clinical deterioration did not differ between groups (9% in the CAA group vs. 6% in the non-CAA group, P=0.66). The overall mortality rate during the acute phase did not significantly differ between groups (4% in the CAA group vs. 12% in the non-CAA group, P=0.46). The modified Rankin scale score three months after discharge ranged from 0 to 3 for 63% of CAA patients compared to 53% of non-CAA patients, with no significant difference (P=0.59).

Conclusion: We did not find a significant difference in the postoperative rebleeding rate after ICH associated with CAA compared to other causes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revue neurologique
Revue neurologique 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
598
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: The first issue of the Revue Neurologique, featuring an original article by Jean-Martin Charcot, was published on February 28th, 1893. Six years later, the French Society of Neurology (SFN) adopted this journal as its official publication in the year of its foundation, 1899. The Revue Neurologique was published throughout the 20th century without interruption and is indexed in all international databases (including Current Contents, Pubmed, Scopus). Ten annual issues provide original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, and review articles giving up-to-date insights in all areas of neurology. The Revue Neurologique also publishes guidelines and recommendations. The Revue Neurologique publishes original articles, brief reports, general reviews, editorials, and letters to the editor as well as correspondence concerning articles previously published in the journal in the correspondence column.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信