Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi, Zohreh Karimi, Motahareh Shirani, Sona Elyasi, Hadiseh Monadi Ziarat
{"title":"基于罗杰斯保护动机理论的宫颈癌筛查行为模型检验研究。","authors":"Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi, Zohreh Karimi, Motahareh Shirani, Sona Elyasi, Hadiseh Monadi Ziarat","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-20214-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cervical cancer is a major global health issue, particularly in developing countries. Pap smear-based cervical cancer screening (CCS) is crucial for prevention. The Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) aids in understanding psychological factors influencing CCS behaviors. This study investigated CCS determinants among Iranian women using Rogers' PMT. This cross-sectional study involved 254 women visiting health centers in Kermanshah and Tehran in 2024. A modified PMT was used with a validated questionnaire measuring fear, perceived vulnerability, perceived intensity, response efficacy, self-efficacy, response cost, demographics, and CCS-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Path analysis was conducted using AMOS. Participants exhibited a mean CCS behavior score of 3.62 (SD = 2.07). Path analysis revealed significant negative total effects on CCS behavior for fear (Standardized Estimate = -0.238, p = 0.009), response cost (Standardized Estimate = -0.111, p = 0.006), and perceived vulnerability (Standardized Estimate = -0.064, p = 0.021). Conversely, positive total effects on CCS behavior were observed for response efficacy (Standardized Estimate = 0.049, p = 0.003), protection motivation (Standardized Estimate = 0.155, p = 0.01), self-efficacy (Standardized Estimate = 0.106, p = 0.007), knowledge (Standardized Estimate = 0.011, p = 0.002), and attitude (Standardized Estimate = 0.052, p = 0.007). Fear, response costs and perceived vulnerability negatively impact CCS behavior among Iranian women, while perceived intensity, response efficacy, protection motivation, knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy are positive factors. The PMT-based model can guide educational programs to promote CCS behavior, informing targeted counseling and program development to enhance CCS uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"36260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12533052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A model testing study of cervical cancer screening behavior using rogers's protection motivation theory.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi, Zohreh Karimi, Motahareh Shirani, Sona Elyasi, Hadiseh Monadi Ziarat\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-20214-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cervical cancer is a major global health issue, particularly in developing countries. Pap smear-based cervical cancer screening (CCS) is crucial for prevention. The Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) aids in understanding psychological factors influencing CCS behaviors. This study investigated CCS determinants among Iranian women using Rogers' PMT. This cross-sectional study involved 254 women visiting health centers in Kermanshah and Tehran in 2024. A modified PMT was used with a validated questionnaire measuring fear, perceived vulnerability, perceived intensity, response efficacy, self-efficacy, response cost, demographics, and CCS-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Path analysis was conducted using AMOS. Participants exhibited a mean CCS behavior score of 3.62 (SD = 2.07). Path analysis revealed significant negative total effects on CCS behavior for fear (Standardized Estimate = -0.238, p = 0.009), response cost (Standardized Estimate = -0.111, p = 0.006), and perceived vulnerability (Standardized Estimate = -0.064, p = 0.021). Conversely, positive total effects on CCS behavior were observed for response efficacy (Standardized Estimate = 0.049, p = 0.003), protection motivation (Standardized Estimate = 0.155, p = 0.01), self-efficacy (Standardized Estimate = 0.106, p = 0.007), knowledge (Standardized Estimate = 0.011, p = 0.002), and attitude (Standardized Estimate = 0.052, p = 0.007). Fear, response costs and perceived vulnerability negatively impact CCS behavior among Iranian women, while perceived intensity, response efficacy, protection motivation, knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy are positive factors. The PMT-based model can guide educational programs to promote CCS behavior, informing targeted counseling and program development to enhance CCS uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"36260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12533052/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20214-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20214-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A model testing study of cervical cancer screening behavior using rogers's protection motivation theory.
Cervical cancer is a major global health issue, particularly in developing countries. Pap smear-based cervical cancer screening (CCS) is crucial for prevention. The Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) aids in understanding psychological factors influencing CCS behaviors. This study investigated CCS determinants among Iranian women using Rogers' PMT. This cross-sectional study involved 254 women visiting health centers in Kermanshah and Tehran in 2024. A modified PMT was used with a validated questionnaire measuring fear, perceived vulnerability, perceived intensity, response efficacy, self-efficacy, response cost, demographics, and CCS-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Path analysis was conducted using AMOS. Participants exhibited a mean CCS behavior score of 3.62 (SD = 2.07). Path analysis revealed significant negative total effects on CCS behavior for fear (Standardized Estimate = -0.238, p = 0.009), response cost (Standardized Estimate = -0.111, p = 0.006), and perceived vulnerability (Standardized Estimate = -0.064, p = 0.021). Conversely, positive total effects on CCS behavior were observed for response efficacy (Standardized Estimate = 0.049, p = 0.003), protection motivation (Standardized Estimate = 0.155, p = 0.01), self-efficacy (Standardized Estimate = 0.106, p = 0.007), knowledge (Standardized Estimate = 0.011, p = 0.002), and attitude (Standardized Estimate = 0.052, p = 0.007). Fear, response costs and perceived vulnerability negatively impact CCS behavior among Iranian women, while perceived intensity, response efficacy, protection motivation, knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy are positive factors. The PMT-based model can guide educational programs to promote CCS behavior, informing targeted counseling and program development to enhance CCS uptake.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.