介入神经放射学中放射技师的职业辐射暴露。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anna Beckert, Christopher Kloth, Angela Kretschmer, Bernd Schmitz, Johannes Rosskopf
{"title":"介入神经放射学中放射技师的职业辐射暴露。","authors":"Anna Beckert, Christopher Kloth, Angela Kretschmer, Bernd Schmitz, Johannes Rosskopf","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03807-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the rising number of angiographic interventional procedures, occupational radiation exposure is becoming increasingly relevant. As even low doses may contribute to stochastic health effects, enhanced radiological protection measures are warranted. This study aimed to systematically quantify the radiation exposure of radiologic technologists under routine clinical conditions and in an experimental setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Radiation dose exposure was monitored over one month using three official dosimeters placed at defined locations within the angiography suite, using the floor-mounted C-arm as a reference point. Dose values were extrapolated to estimate annual exposure. Additionally, experimental dose rate measurements were performed at eight locations and three height levels (foot, torso, eye) under standardized conditions using both standard and low-dose DSA protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Official dosimeter readings averaged less than 2% of the reference value at the C-arm. The extrapolated annual occupational radiation exposure was low (0.44 mSv), with the highest value of 1.03 mSv near the door to the supply room. Experimental measurements revealed average radiation dose rates of 885 µSv/h; with a wide range from: 12 to 6109 µSv/h. Dose rates were more strongly influenced by the shielding effect of stationary protective equipment (reduction factor of 31) than by spatial distance. The highest radiation exposure occurred at foot level. Low-dose protocols reduced ambient radiation by an average of 23%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Occupational exposure remained well below legal thresholds but varied spatially. Stationary shielding and low-dose protocols proved most effective for dose reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational radiation exposure of radiologic technologists in Interventional neuroradiology.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Beckert, Christopher Kloth, Angela Kretschmer, Bernd Schmitz, Johannes Rosskopf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00234-025-03807-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the rising number of angiographic interventional procedures, occupational radiation exposure is becoming increasingly relevant. As even low doses may contribute to stochastic health effects, enhanced radiological protection measures are warranted. This study aimed to systematically quantify the radiation exposure of radiologic technologists under routine clinical conditions and in an experimental setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Radiation dose exposure was monitored over one month using three official dosimeters placed at defined locations within the angiography suite, using the floor-mounted C-arm as a reference point. Dose values were extrapolated to estimate annual exposure. Additionally, experimental dose rate measurements were performed at eight locations and three height levels (foot, torso, eye) under standardized conditions using both standard and low-dose DSA protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Official dosimeter readings averaged less than 2% of the reference value at the C-arm. The extrapolated annual occupational radiation exposure was low (0.44 mSv), with the highest value of 1.03 mSv near the door to the supply room. Experimental measurements revealed average radiation dose rates of 885 µSv/h; with a wide range from: 12 to 6109 µSv/h. Dose rates were more strongly influenced by the shielding effect of stationary protective equipment (reduction factor of 31) than by spatial distance. The highest radiation exposure occurred at foot level. Low-dose protocols reduced ambient radiation by an average of 23%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Occupational exposure remained well below legal thresholds but varied spatially. Stationary shielding and low-dose protocols proved most effective for dose reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03807-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03807-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着血管造影介入手术数量的增加,职业性辐射暴露变得越来越重要。由于即使是低剂量也可能造成随机的健康影响,因此有必要加强辐射防护措施。本研究旨在系统地量化放射技师在常规临床条件和实验环境下的辐射暴露。方法:使用放置在血管造影套件内指定位置的三个官方剂量计监测辐射剂量暴露超过一个月,使用地板安装的c臂作为参考点。外推剂量值来估计年暴露量。此外,在标准化条件下,使用标准和低剂量DSA方案,在8个位置和3个高度水平(脚、躯干、眼睛)进行实验剂量率测量。结果:官方剂量计读数平均小于c臂参考值的2%。外推的年职业辐射暴露量较低(0.44毫西弗),最高值为1.03毫西弗。实验测量显示,平均辐射剂量率为885µSv/h;范围从:12至6109µSv/h。固定防护设备的屏蔽效应对剂量率的影响比空间距离的影响更大(缩小系数为31)。最高的辐射暴露发生在足部。低剂量方案使环境辐射平均减少23%。结论:职业暴露量均低于法定阈值,但存在空间差异。静止屏蔽和低剂量方案证明对减少剂量最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occupational radiation exposure of radiologic technologists in Interventional neuroradiology.

Purpose: With the rising number of angiographic interventional procedures, occupational radiation exposure is becoming increasingly relevant. As even low doses may contribute to stochastic health effects, enhanced radiological protection measures are warranted. This study aimed to systematically quantify the radiation exposure of radiologic technologists under routine clinical conditions and in an experimental setting.

Methods: Radiation dose exposure was monitored over one month using three official dosimeters placed at defined locations within the angiography suite, using the floor-mounted C-arm as a reference point. Dose values were extrapolated to estimate annual exposure. Additionally, experimental dose rate measurements were performed at eight locations and three height levels (foot, torso, eye) under standardized conditions using both standard and low-dose DSA protocols.

Results: Official dosimeter readings averaged less than 2% of the reference value at the C-arm. The extrapolated annual occupational radiation exposure was low (0.44 mSv), with the highest value of 1.03 mSv near the door to the supply room. Experimental measurements revealed average radiation dose rates of 885 µSv/h; with a wide range from: 12 to 6109 µSv/h. Dose rates were more strongly influenced by the shielding effect of stationary protective equipment (reduction factor of 31) than by spatial distance. The highest radiation exposure occurred at foot level. Low-dose protocols reduced ambient radiation by an average of 23%.

Conclusion: Occupational exposure remained well below legal thresholds but varied spatially. Stationary shielding and low-dose protocols proved most effective for dose reduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信