Anna Beckert, Christopher Kloth, Angela Kretschmer, Bernd Schmitz, Johannes Rosskopf
{"title":"介入神经放射学中放射技师的职业辐射暴露。","authors":"Anna Beckert, Christopher Kloth, Angela Kretschmer, Bernd Schmitz, Johannes Rosskopf","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03807-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the rising number of angiographic interventional procedures, occupational radiation exposure is becoming increasingly relevant. As even low doses may contribute to stochastic health effects, enhanced radiological protection measures are warranted. This study aimed to systematically quantify the radiation exposure of radiologic technologists under routine clinical conditions and in an experimental setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Radiation dose exposure was monitored over one month using three official dosimeters placed at defined locations within the angiography suite, using the floor-mounted C-arm as a reference point. Dose values were extrapolated to estimate annual exposure. Additionally, experimental dose rate measurements were performed at eight locations and three height levels (foot, torso, eye) under standardized conditions using both standard and low-dose DSA protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Official dosimeter readings averaged less than 2% of the reference value at the C-arm. The extrapolated annual occupational radiation exposure was low (0.44 mSv), with the highest value of 1.03 mSv near the door to the supply room. Experimental measurements revealed average radiation dose rates of 885 µSv/h; with a wide range from: 12 to 6109 µSv/h. Dose rates were more strongly influenced by the shielding effect of stationary protective equipment (reduction factor of 31) than by spatial distance. The highest radiation exposure occurred at foot level. Low-dose protocols reduced ambient radiation by an average of 23%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Occupational exposure remained well below legal thresholds but varied spatially. Stationary shielding and low-dose protocols proved most effective for dose reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational radiation exposure of radiologic technologists in Interventional neuroradiology.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Beckert, Christopher Kloth, Angela Kretschmer, Bernd Schmitz, Johannes Rosskopf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00234-025-03807-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the rising number of angiographic interventional procedures, occupational radiation exposure is becoming increasingly relevant. As even low doses may contribute to stochastic health effects, enhanced radiological protection measures are warranted. This study aimed to systematically quantify the radiation exposure of radiologic technologists under routine clinical conditions and in an experimental setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Radiation dose exposure was monitored over one month using three official dosimeters placed at defined locations within the angiography suite, using the floor-mounted C-arm as a reference point. Dose values were extrapolated to estimate annual exposure. Additionally, experimental dose rate measurements were performed at eight locations and three height levels (foot, torso, eye) under standardized conditions using both standard and low-dose DSA protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Official dosimeter readings averaged less than 2% of the reference value at the C-arm. The extrapolated annual occupational radiation exposure was low (0.44 mSv), with the highest value of 1.03 mSv near the door to the supply room. Experimental measurements revealed average radiation dose rates of 885 µSv/h; with a wide range from: 12 to 6109 µSv/h. Dose rates were more strongly influenced by the shielding effect of stationary protective equipment (reduction factor of 31) than by spatial distance. The highest radiation exposure occurred at foot level. Low-dose protocols reduced ambient radiation by an average of 23%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Occupational exposure remained well below legal thresholds but varied spatially. Stationary shielding and low-dose protocols proved most effective for dose reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03807-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03807-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Occupational radiation exposure of radiologic technologists in Interventional neuroradiology.
Purpose: With the rising number of angiographic interventional procedures, occupational radiation exposure is becoming increasingly relevant. As even low doses may contribute to stochastic health effects, enhanced radiological protection measures are warranted. This study aimed to systematically quantify the radiation exposure of radiologic technologists under routine clinical conditions and in an experimental setting.
Methods: Radiation dose exposure was monitored over one month using three official dosimeters placed at defined locations within the angiography suite, using the floor-mounted C-arm as a reference point. Dose values were extrapolated to estimate annual exposure. Additionally, experimental dose rate measurements were performed at eight locations and three height levels (foot, torso, eye) under standardized conditions using both standard and low-dose DSA protocols.
Results: Official dosimeter readings averaged less than 2% of the reference value at the C-arm. The extrapolated annual occupational radiation exposure was low (0.44 mSv), with the highest value of 1.03 mSv near the door to the supply room. Experimental measurements revealed average radiation dose rates of 885 µSv/h; with a wide range from: 12 to 6109 µSv/h. Dose rates were more strongly influenced by the shielding effect of stationary protective equipment (reduction factor of 31) than by spatial distance. The highest radiation exposure occurred at foot level. Low-dose protocols reduced ambient radiation by an average of 23%.
Conclusion: Occupational exposure remained well below legal thresholds but varied spatially. Stationary shielding and low-dose protocols proved most effective for dose reduction.
期刊介绍:
Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.