Matthew A Timmins, So Yu Cicy Ng, Micheal S McCloskey, Mitchell E Berman, Emil F Coccaro
{"title":"自我攻击范式中的极端(“20”)自我电击与终生自杀企图史:在自杀研究中的潜在应用。","authors":"Matthew A Timmins, So Yu Cicy Ng, Micheal S McCloskey, Mitchell E Berman, Emil F Coccaro","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.10.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) share many risk factors, correlates, and ethical and pragmatic barriers to research; thus, methods exploring one may provide indirect insights into the other. The Self-Aggression Paradigm (SAP) is a behavioral analog task for NSSI in the laboratory via self-administered shocks and has demonstrated associations with suicide risk factors. We compared behavior during the SAP between participants with a suicide attempt history (SA+; n = 88, women = 56, men = 32)-between 1 to 13 attempts (M = 1.3, SD = 0.705)-to those without (SA-; n = 654, women = 373, men = 281) using the number of highest available (\"extreme\") shocks selected and average shock selection. We predicted SA+ would select more extreme shocks and higher average shocks and this would remain true for extreme shocks but not average shock selection after controlling for NSSI history. General linear model analyses revealed that SA+ selected more extreme shocks overall and higher average shocks compared to SA- with small effect sizes. This remained true after controlling for NSSI history; however, effect sizes were negligible after including NSSI Our results provide some evidence supporting using the SAP in studies on suicidal behavior, albeit with small effect sizes. Future research may benefit from comparing SAP behavior between participants with a recent suicide attempt versus those with more remote histories of suicidal behavior, as well as recruiting for more NSSI behavior for further comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"191 ","pages":"722-728"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extreme (\\\"20\\\") self-shocks during the Self-Aggression Paradigm and lifetime suicide attempt history: Potential use in suicide research.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew A Timmins, So Yu Cicy Ng, Micheal S McCloskey, Mitchell E Berman, Emil F Coccaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.10.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) share many risk factors, correlates, and ethical and pragmatic barriers to research; thus, methods exploring one may provide indirect insights into the other. The Self-Aggression Paradigm (SAP) is a behavioral analog task for NSSI in the laboratory via self-administered shocks and has demonstrated associations with suicide risk factors. We compared behavior during the SAP between participants with a suicide attempt history (SA+; n = 88, women = 56, men = 32)-between 1 to 13 attempts (M = 1.3, SD = 0.705)-to those without (SA-; n = 654, women = 373, men = 281) using the number of highest available (\\\"extreme\\\") shocks selected and average shock selection. We predicted SA+ would select more extreme shocks and higher average shocks and this would remain true for extreme shocks but not average shock selection after controlling for NSSI history. General linear model analyses revealed that SA+ selected more extreme shocks overall and higher average shocks compared to SA- with small effect sizes. This remained true after controlling for NSSI history; however, effect sizes were negligible after including NSSI Our results provide some evidence supporting using the SAP in studies on suicidal behavior, albeit with small effect sizes. Future research may benefit from comparing SAP behavior between participants with a recent suicide attempt versus those with more remote histories of suicidal behavior, as well as recruiting for more NSSI behavior for further comparisons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"722-728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.10.019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.10.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
自杀行为和非自杀性自伤(NSSI)有许多共同的风险因素、相关因素以及研究的伦理和实用障碍;因此,探索其中一种的方法可能提供对另一种的间接见解。自我攻击范式(SAP)是在实验室中通过自我电击进行的自伤行为模拟任务,并已被证明与自杀风险因素有关。我们比较了有自杀企图史的参与者(SA+, n = 88,女性= 56,男性= 32)- 1至13次(M = 1.3, SD = 0.705)-与没有自杀企图史的参与者(SA-, n = 654,女性= 373,男性= 281)在SAP期间的行为,使用选择的最高可用(“极端”)电击次数和平均电击次数。我们预测SA+会选择更多的极端冲击和更高的平均冲击,在控制自伤历史后,极端冲击的选择仍然成立,而平均冲击的选择则不成立。一般线性模型分析显示,与SA-相比,SA+总体上选择了更极端的冲击,平均冲击更高,效应较小。在控制了自伤史后,这一结果仍然成立;我们的研究结果提供了一些支持在自杀行为研究中使用SAP的证据,尽管效应量很小。未来的研究可能会受益于比较最近有自杀企图的参与者和那些有较远自杀历史的参与者之间的SAP行为,以及招募更多的自伤行为进行进一步的比较。
Extreme ("20") self-shocks during the Self-Aggression Paradigm and lifetime suicide attempt history: Potential use in suicide research.
Suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) share many risk factors, correlates, and ethical and pragmatic barriers to research; thus, methods exploring one may provide indirect insights into the other. The Self-Aggression Paradigm (SAP) is a behavioral analog task for NSSI in the laboratory via self-administered shocks and has demonstrated associations with suicide risk factors. We compared behavior during the SAP between participants with a suicide attempt history (SA+; n = 88, women = 56, men = 32)-between 1 to 13 attempts (M = 1.3, SD = 0.705)-to those without (SA-; n = 654, women = 373, men = 281) using the number of highest available ("extreme") shocks selected and average shock selection. We predicted SA+ would select more extreme shocks and higher average shocks and this would remain true for extreme shocks but not average shock selection after controlling for NSSI history. General linear model analyses revealed that SA+ selected more extreme shocks overall and higher average shocks compared to SA- with small effect sizes. This remained true after controlling for NSSI history; however, effect sizes were negligible after including NSSI Our results provide some evidence supporting using the SAP in studies on suicidal behavior, albeit with small effect sizes. Future research may benefit from comparing SAP behavior between participants with a recent suicide attempt versus those with more remote histories of suicidal behavior, as well as recruiting for more NSSI behavior for further comparisons.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research:
(1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors;
(2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology;
(3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;