在主观折射中探索自己动手的方法。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-10-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0334644
Raquel Salvador-Roger, José J Esteve-Taboada, Sara Ferrer-Altabás, Vicente Micó, Alberto Domínguez-Vicent, Abinaya Priya Venkataraman
{"title":"在主观折射中探索自己动手的方法。","authors":"Raquel Salvador-Roger, José J Esteve-Taboada, Sara Ferrer-Altabás, Vicente Micó, Alberto Domínguez-Vicent, Abinaya Priya Venkataraman","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0334644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the precision and accuracy of a novel do-it-yourself (DIY) subjective refraction technique utilizing a manual tunable spherical lens and an adjustable astigmatic lens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six participants performed three self-refraction measurements using a DIY approach, while an optometrist conducted one measurement using the traditional subjective refraction methodology. The DIY approach relied on power vector analysis, where a tunable spherical lens and an adjustable astigmatic lens (Stokes lens), aligned to the participant's eye, were rotated to obtain measurements. The study assessed refractive error, visual acuity, and required measurement time. Repeatability was evaluated using the coefficient of repeatability, and agreement between methods was analyzed using limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The coefficients of repeatability for refractive error components (M, J0, J45) were ±0.38 D, ± 0.21 D, and ±0.21 D, respectively. Visual acuity showed a repeatability of ±0.06 logMAR, and the required time had a repeatability of ±55 seconds. The limits of agreement between the DIY approach and the traditional method were ±0.64 D, ± 0.36 D, and ±0.26 D for refractive error components, ± 0.04 logMAR for visual acuity, and ±127 seconds for required time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DIY approach can be considered a repeatable alternative among self-subjective refraction methods, although it is a first attempt and not yet fully automatic. While it cannot supplant traditional subjective refraction and further research would be required to address, it has the potential to be a viable option in certain specific cases, such as circumstances characterized by a lack of eye care professionals or humanitarian works.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 10","pages":"e0334644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the do-it-yourself approach in subjective refraction.\",\"authors\":\"Raquel Salvador-Roger, José J Esteve-Taboada, Sara Ferrer-Altabás, Vicente Micó, Alberto Domínguez-Vicent, Abinaya Priya Venkataraman\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0334644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the precision and accuracy of a novel do-it-yourself (DIY) subjective refraction technique utilizing a manual tunable spherical lens and an adjustable astigmatic lens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six participants performed three self-refraction measurements using a DIY approach, while an optometrist conducted one measurement using the traditional subjective refraction methodology. The DIY approach relied on power vector analysis, where a tunable spherical lens and an adjustable astigmatic lens (Stokes lens), aligned to the participant's eye, were rotated to obtain measurements. The study assessed refractive error, visual acuity, and required measurement time. Repeatability was evaluated using the coefficient of repeatability, and agreement between methods was analyzed using limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The coefficients of repeatability for refractive error components (M, J0, J45) were ±0.38 D, ± 0.21 D, and ±0.21 D, respectively. Visual acuity showed a repeatability of ±0.06 logMAR, and the required time had a repeatability of ±55 seconds. The limits of agreement between the DIY approach and the traditional method were ±0.64 D, ± 0.36 D, and ±0.26 D for refractive error components, ± 0.04 logMAR for visual acuity, and ±127 seconds for required time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DIY approach can be considered a repeatable alternative among self-subjective refraction methods, although it is a first attempt and not yet fully automatic. While it cannot supplant traditional subjective refraction and further research would be required to address, it has the potential to be a viable option in certain specific cases, such as circumstances characterized by a lack of eye care professionals or humanitarian works.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"e0334644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530553/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334644\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价一种新颖的自制(DIY)主观折射技术的精度和准确性,该技术采用手动可调球面透镜和可调散光透镜。方法:66名参与者使用DIY方法进行了三次自我屈光测量,而验光师使用传统的主观屈光方法进行了一次测量。DIY方法依赖于功率矢量分析,其中可调球面透镜和可调散光透镜(Stokes透镜)对准参与者的眼睛,旋转以获得测量值。该研究评估了屈光不正、视力和所需的测量时间。用重复性系数评价重复性,用一致性限分析方法间的一致性。结果:屈光不正分量(M、J0、J45)的重复性系数分别为±0.38 D、±0.21 D、±0.21 D。视力重复性为±0.06 logMAR,所需时间重复性为±55秒。DIY方法与传统方法的误差范围分别为±0.64 D、±0.36 D和±0.26 D,视力误差范围为±0.04 logMAR,所需时间范围为±127秒。结论:虽然这是第一次尝试,尚未完全自动化,但DIY方法可以被认为是自我主观屈光方法中可重复的替代方法。虽然它不能取代传统的主观屈光,需要进一步的研究来解决,但在某些特定情况下,它有可能成为一种可行的选择,例如缺乏眼科护理专业人员或人道主义工作的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring the do-it-yourself approach in subjective refraction.

Exploring the do-it-yourself approach in subjective refraction.

Exploring the do-it-yourself approach in subjective refraction.

Exploring the do-it-yourself approach in subjective refraction.

Purpose: To evaluate the precision and accuracy of a novel do-it-yourself (DIY) subjective refraction technique utilizing a manual tunable spherical lens and an adjustable astigmatic lens.

Methods: Sixty-six participants performed three self-refraction measurements using a DIY approach, while an optometrist conducted one measurement using the traditional subjective refraction methodology. The DIY approach relied on power vector analysis, where a tunable spherical lens and an adjustable astigmatic lens (Stokes lens), aligned to the participant's eye, were rotated to obtain measurements. The study assessed refractive error, visual acuity, and required measurement time. Repeatability was evaluated using the coefficient of repeatability, and agreement between methods was analyzed using limits of agreement.

Results: The coefficients of repeatability for refractive error components (M, J0, J45) were ±0.38 D, ± 0.21 D, and ±0.21 D, respectively. Visual acuity showed a repeatability of ±0.06 logMAR, and the required time had a repeatability of ±55 seconds. The limits of agreement between the DIY approach and the traditional method were ±0.64 D, ± 0.36 D, and ±0.26 D for refractive error components, ± 0.04 logMAR for visual acuity, and ±127 seconds for required time.

Conclusions: The DIY approach can be considered a repeatable alternative among self-subjective refraction methods, although it is a first attempt and not yet fully automatic. While it cannot supplant traditional subjective refraction and further research would be required to address, it has the potential to be a viable option in certain specific cases, such as circumstances characterized by a lack of eye care professionals or humanitarian works.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信