评估TikTok和Bilibili减肥外科教育内容的可靠性和质量:横断面内容分析。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Gang Peng, Chen Wang, Hong-Wei Zhang, Ting Xu, Jian-Zhong Di
{"title":"评估TikTok和Bilibili减肥外科教育内容的可靠性和质量:横断面内容分析。","authors":"Gang Peng, Chen Wang, Hong-Wei Zhang, Ting Xu, Jian-Zhong Di","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-08317-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is a chronic disease with a rising global prevalence, representing a significant public health burden. Patients increasingly utilize short-video platforms such as TikTok and Bilibili to obtain health information regarding bariatric surgery. The quality and reliability of this content have not been thoroughly evaluated, raising concerns about the potential for misinformation to influence patient decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional content analysis was conducted on the top 100 videos retrieved from both TikTok and Bilibili using the keyword \"bariatric surgery\" in Chinese. After excluding irrelevant and duplicate content, a total of 200 videos were included for analysis. Videos were systematically categorized by uploader type and content. Two senior bariatric surgeons independently assessed the videos for quality and reliability using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and a modified DISCERN instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TikTok videos demonstrated significantly higher user engagement, with greater median likes, collections, shares, and comments compared to Bilibili (p < 0.001). Conversely, Bilibili videos had a significantly longer median duration (p < 0.001). The overall quality of videos on both platforms was suboptimal. However, TikTok videos received modestly higher GQS and DISCERN scores from both reviewers (p < 0.05). Content uploaded by professional institutions achieved the highest quality scores across both platforms (p < 0.001). Professional individuals were the predominant uploaders, accounting for 79.0% of the videos. A strong positive correlation was observed among user engagement metrics (likes, saves, shares, comments; r > 0.9), but these metrics showed no significant correlation with GQS or DISCERN quality scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality and reliability of bariatric surgery-related educational content on both TikTok and Bilibili are largely inadequate. While TikTok videos demonstrated slightly superior quality scores, professional institutions represent the most reliable source of information. User engagement metrics are poor indicators of video quality. These findings underscore the need for healthcare professionals to guide patients in navigating online health information and for platforms to implement more stringent quality control measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of Bariatric Surgery Educational Content on TikTok and Bilibili: a Cross-Sectional Content Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gang Peng, Chen Wang, Hong-Wei Zhang, Ting Xu, Jian-Zhong Di\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-025-08317-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is a chronic disease with a rising global prevalence, representing a significant public health burden. Patients increasingly utilize short-video platforms such as TikTok and Bilibili to obtain health information regarding bariatric surgery. The quality and reliability of this content have not been thoroughly evaluated, raising concerns about the potential for misinformation to influence patient decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional content analysis was conducted on the top 100 videos retrieved from both TikTok and Bilibili using the keyword \\\"bariatric surgery\\\" in Chinese. After excluding irrelevant and duplicate content, a total of 200 videos were included for analysis. Videos were systematically categorized by uploader type and content. Two senior bariatric surgeons independently assessed the videos for quality and reliability using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and a modified DISCERN instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TikTok videos demonstrated significantly higher user engagement, with greater median likes, collections, shares, and comments compared to Bilibili (p < 0.001). Conversely, Bilibili videos had a significantly longer median duration (p < 0.001). The overall quality of videos on both platforms was suboptimal. However, TikTok videos received modestly higher GQS and DISCERN scores from both reviewers (p < 0.05). Content uploaded by professional institutions achieved the highest quality scores across both platforms (p < 0.001). Professional individuals were the predominant uploaders, accounting for 79.0% of the videos. A strong positive correlation was observed among user engagement metrics (likes, saves, shares, comments; r > 0.9), but these metrics showed no significant correlation with GQS or DISCERN quality scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality and reliability of bariatric surgery-related educational content on both TikTok and Bilibili are largely inadequate. While TikTok videos demonstrated slightly superior quality scores, professional institutions represent the most reliable source of information. User engagement metrics are poor indicators of video quality. These findings underscore the need for healthcare professionals to guide patients in navigating online health information and for platforms to implement more stringent quality control measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-08317-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-08317-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肥胖是一种全球患病率不断上升的慢性疾病,是一项重大的公共卫生负担。越来越多的患者利用抖音、哔哩哔哩等短视频平台获取有关减肥手术的健康信息。这些内容的质量和可靠性尚未得到彻底评估,这引起了人们对错误信息可能影响患者决策的担忧。方法:对TikTok和Bilibili以中文关键词“减肥手术”检索的前100个视频进行横断面内容分析。剔除不相关和重复内容后,共纳入200个视频进行分析。视频按上传者类型和内容进行系统分类。两位资深减肥外科医生使用全球质量评分(GQS)和改良的DISCERN仪器独立评估视频的质量和可靠性。结果:与Bilibili相比,TikTok视频显示出更高的用户参与度,喜欢、收藏、分享和评论的中位数更高(p为0.9),但这些指标与GQS或DISCERN质量分数没有显著相关性。结论:TikTok和Bilibili上减肥手术相关教育内容的质量和可靠性都存在很大不足。虽然TikTok视频的质量分数略高,但专业机构代表着最可靠的信息来源。用户粘性指标是视频质量的糟糕指标。这些发现强调,医疗保健专业人员需要指导患者浏览在线健康信息,平台需要实施更严格的质量控制措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of Bariatric Surgery Educational Content on TikTok and Bilibili: a Cross-Sectional Content Analysis.

Background: Obesity is a chronic disease with a rising global prevalence, representing a significant public health burden. Patients increasingly utilize short-video platforms such as TikTok and Bilibili to obtain health information regarding bariatric surgery. The quality and reliability of this content have not been thoroughly evaluated, raising concerns about the potential for misinformation to influence patient decision-making.

Methods: A cross-sectional content analysis was conducted on the top 100 videos retrieved from both TikTok and Bilibili using the keyword "bariatric surgery" in Chinese. After excluding irrelevant and duplicate content, a total of 200 videos were included for analysis. Videos were systematically categorized by uploader type and content. Two senior bariatric surgeons independently assessed the videos for quality and reliability using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and a modified DISCERN instrument.

Results: TikTok videos demonstrated significantly higher user engagement, with greater median likes, collections, shares, and comments compared to Bilibili (p < 0.001). Conversely, Bilibili videos had a significantly longer median duration (p < 0.001). The overall quality of videos on both platforms was suboptimal. However, TikTok videos received modestly higher GQS and DISCERN scores from both reviewers (p < 0.05). Content uploaded by professional institutions achieved the highest quality scores across both platforms (p < 0.001). Professional individuals were the predominant uploaders, accounting for 79.0% of the videos. A strong positive correlation was observed among user engagement metrics (likes, saves, shares, comments; r > 0.9), but these metrics showed no significant correlation with GQS or DISCERN quality scores.

Conclusion: The quality and reliability of bariatric surgery-related educational content on both TikTok and Bilibili are largely inadequate. While TikTok videos demonstrated slightly superior quality scores, professional institutions represent the most reliable source of information. User engagement metrics are poor indicators of video quality. These findings underscore the need for healthcare professionals to guide patients in navigating online health information and for platforms to implement more stringent quality control measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信