照亮鼻整形术:最佳前照灯角度和颈椎位置对手术视野的照明。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Joseph Byorth, John Auden, Rahul Varman, Joshua Demke
{"title":"照亮鼻整形术:最佳前照灯角度和颈椎位置对手术视野的照明。","authors":"Joseph Byorth, John Auden, Rahul Varman, Joshua Demke","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000012035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimal visualization during rhinoplasty is essential for surgical success, yet improper headlight angle and cervical neck positioning can reduce illumination and contribute to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in surgeons. This study aimed to determine the ideal combination of headlight angle and cervical flexion that maximizes lighting of the surgical field while minimizing physical strain. A 3D-printed nasal model was used to simulate surgical conditions, and illumination was measured using a PerfectPrime LM531 LED lux meter. Headlight angles of 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 degrees were tested in combination with cervical neck flexion angles of 0, 15, 30, and 45 degrees, using a Ronin X6 surgical headlight positioned at both brow and mid-forehead levels. Measurements were taken in a light-controlled testing chamber, and angles were precisely measured using anatomic landmarks and protractors. The highest illumination (3240 lux) was recorded with a 40-degree headlight angle and 30-degree cervical flexion at the mid-forehead position. A similar lux value (3020) was achieved with a 35-degree headlight angle and 26-degree cervical flexion. Illumination declined significantly at the extremes of flexion and extension, and higher flexion angles were associated with increased reports of musculoskeletal fatigue during testing. Based on these findings, a headlight angle of 35 degrees and cervical flexion of 25 degrees provided optimal lighting while minimizing physical strain and may serve as a recommended starting point for trainees and experienced surgeons. These results offer practical guidance for improving ergonomics and visualization during rhinoplasty and have potential applications in surgical education and setup standardization.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shedding Light on Rhinoplasty: Optimal Headlight Angle and Cervical Positioning for Illumination of the Surgical Field.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Byorth, John Auden, Rahul Varman, Joshua Demke\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000012035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Optimal visualization during rhinoplasty is essential for surgical success, yet improper headlight angle and cervical neck positioning can reduce illumination and contribute to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in surgeons. This study aimed to determine the ideal combination of headlight angle and cervical flexion that maximizes lighting of the surgical field while minimizing physical strain. A 3D-printed nasal model was used to simulate surgical conditions, and illumination was measured using a PerfectPrime LM531 LED lux meter. Headlight angles of 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 degrees were tested in combination with cervical neck flexion angles of 0, 15, 30, and 45 degrees, using a Ronin X6 surgical headlight positioned at both brow and mid-forehead levels. Measurements were taken in a light-controlled testing chamber, and angles were precisely measured using anatomic landmarks and protractors. The highest illumination (3240 lux) was recorded with a 40-degree headlight angle and 30-degree cervical flexion at the mid-forehead position. A similar lux value (3020) was achieved with a 35-degree headlight angle and 26-degree cervical flexion. Illumination declined significantly at the extremes of flexion and extension, and higher flexion angles were associated with increased reports of musculoskeletal fatigue during testing. Based on these findings, a headlight angle of 35 degrees and cervical flexion of 25 degrees provided optimal lighting while minimizing physical strain and may serve as a recommended starting point for trainees and experienced surgeons. These results offer practical guidance for improving ergonomics and visualization during rhinoplasty and have potential applications in surgical education and setup standardization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012035\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼻成形术中最佳的视觉效果对手术成功至关重要,然而不适当的前照灯角度和颈部定位会减少照明,并导致外科医生工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSDs)。本研究旨在确定前照灯角度和颈椎屈曲的理想组合,以最大限度地提高手术视野的照明,同时最大限度地减少身体疲劳。使用3d打印鼻腔模型模拟手术条件,并使用PerfectPrime LM531 LED勒克斯计测量照明。头灯的角度分别为20度、25度、30度、35度和40度,颈部屈曲角度分别为0度、15度、30度和45度,使用位于额头和前额中部的Ronin X6手术头灯。测量是在一个光控测试室进行的,角度是用解剖标志和量角器精确测量的。记录最高照度(3240勒克斯)时,头灯角度为40度,颈部在前额正中位置弯曲30度。在35度前照灯角度和26度颈椎屈曲的情况下,获得了相似的勒克斯值(3020)。在屈曲和伸展的极端情况下,光照明显下降,在测试期间,较高的屈曲角度与肌肉骨骼疲劳的报告增加有关。基于这些发现,车头灯角度为35度,颈椎屈曲为25度提供了最佳照明,同时最大限度地减少了身体的压力,可以作为培训生和经验丰富的外科医生的推荐起点。这些结果为改善鼻整形术的人机工程学和可视化提供了实用指导,并在外科教育和设备标准化方面具有潜在的应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shedding Light on Rhinoplasty: Optimal Headlight Angle and Cervical Positioning for Illumination of the Surgical Field.

Optimal visualization during rhinoplasty is essential for surgical success, yet improper headlight angle and cervical neck positioning can reduce illumination and contribute to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in surgeons. This study aimed to determine the ideal combination of headlight angle and cervical flexion that maximizes lighting of the surgical field while minimizing physical strain. A 3D-printed nasal model was used to simulate surgical conditions, and illumination was measured using a PerfectPrime LM531 LED lux meter. Headlight angles of 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 degrees were tested in combination with cervical neck flexion angles of 0, 15, 30, and 45 degrees, using a Ronin X6 surgical headlight positioned at both brow and mid-forehead levels. Measurements were taken in a light-controlled testing chamber, and angles were precisely measured using anatomic landmarks and protractors. The highest illumination (3240 lux) was recorded with a 40-degree headlight angle and 30-degree cervical flexion at the mid-forehead position. A similar lux value (3020) was achieved with a 35-degree headlight angle and 26-degree cervical flexion. Illumination declined significantly at the extremes of flexion and extension, and higher flexion angles were associated with increased reports of musculoskeletal fatigue during testing. Based on these findings, a headlight angle of 35 degrees and cervical flexion of 25 degrees provided optimal lighting while minimizing physical strain and may serve as a recommended starting point for trainees and experienced surgeons. These results offer practical guidance for improving ergonomics and visualization during rhinoplasty and have potential applications in surgical education and setup standardization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信