肌肉松弛剂对LMA保护罩术后咽喉痛的影响:一项前瞻性随机双盲临床研究。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Siyi Xiong, Mingxiao Chai, Peiqi Xu, Xiaoqian Shi, Chenxi Gao, Jiayun Zhang, Shujie Liu, Jinghui Shi
{"title":"肌肉松弛剂对LMA保护罩术后咽喉痛的影响:一项前瞻性随机双盲临床研究。","authors":"Siyi Xiong, Mingxiao Chai, Peiqi Xu, Xiaoqian Shi, Chenxi Gao, Jiayun Zhang, Shujie Liu, Jinghui Shi","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000012043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To observe the performance of the LMA Protector mask during short anesthesia procedures in gynecology with or without muscle relaxants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients (aged 18-65 years old, BMI <35 kg/m2) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III, scheduled to undergo elective gynecologic surgery, with an expected operative time <1 hour, were randomly divided into 2 groups, that is, the muscle relaxant group and the control group. The patients were given 0.06 mg/kg cisatracurium or the same amount of normal saline. The primary outcome was postoperative sore throat, and the secondary outcomes were the postoperative adverse effects, recovery time, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), and the ease score of placements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in postoperative sore throat, the amount of blood stained on the laryngeal mask, and other postoperative adverse effects in both groups. The OLP of LMA Protector in the muscle relaxant group was 32 cm H2O, which was significantly higher than the 28 cm H2O in the control group (P=0.0017). The ease of mask placement score was significantly lower in the muscle relaxant group at 2 (0-4) than in the control group at 3 (0-6) (P=0.042). The eye-opening time, laryngeal mask removal time, and leaving time in the muscle relaxant group were significantly longer than in the control group (all P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of muscle relaxants does not affect postoperative sore throat associated with the LMA Protector mask, but facilitates the placement and also helped to improve OLP, thus improving mask tightness and enhancing the safety of the laryngeal mask.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Muscle Relaxants on the Postoperative Sore Throat Associated With LMA Protector Mask: A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Siyi Xiong, Mingxiao Chai, Peiqi Xu, Xiaoqian Shi, Chenxi Gao, Jiayun Zhang, Shujie Liu, Jinghui Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000012043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To observe the performance of the LMA Protector mask during short anesthesia procedures in gynecology with or without muscle relaxants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients (aged 18-65 years old, BMI <35 kg/m2) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III, scheduled to undergo elective gynecologic surgery, with an expected operative time <1 hour, were randomly divided into 2 groups, that is, the muscle relaxant group and the control group. The patients were given 0.06 mg/kg cisatracurium or the same amount of normal saline. The primary outcome was postoperative sore throat, and the secondary outcomes were the postoperative adverse effects, recovery time, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), and the ease score of placements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in postoperative sore throat, the amount of blood stained on the laryngeal mask, and other postoperative adverse effects in both groups. The OLP of LMA Protector in the muscle relaxant group was 32 cm H2O, which was significantly higher than the 28 cm H2O in the control group (P=0.0017). The ease of mask placement score was significantly lower in the muscle relaxant group at 2 (0-4) than in the control group at 3 (0-6) (P=0.042). The eye-opening time, laryngeal mask removal time, and leaving time in the muscle relaxant group were significantly longer than in the control group (all P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of muscle relaxants does not affect postoperative sore throat associated with the LMA Protector mask, but facilitates the placement and also helped to improve OLP, thus improving mask tightness and enhancing the safety of the laryngeal mask.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:观察LMA保护罩在妇科短麻醉过程中使用或不使用肌肉松弛剂的性能。方法:共100例患者(年龄18-65岁,BMI)。结果:两组患者在术后咽痛、喉罩血染量等术后不良反应方面无显著差异。肌松剂组LMA保护剂的OLP为32 cm H2O,显著高于对照组的28 cm H2O (P=0.0017)。肌松剂组2分(0 ~ 4分)时面罩放置难易度评分明显低于对照组3分(0 ~ 6分)时(P=0.042)。肌松剂组患者的睁眼时间、取喉罩时间、留喉时间均显著高于对照组(均p)。结论:肌松剂的使用不仅不影响术后LMA保护膜相关咽喉痛,而且有利于放置,有助于改善OLP,从而改善了面罩的紧度,增强了喉罩的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Muscle Relaxants on the Postoperative Sore Throat Associated With LMA Protector Mask: A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Study.

Objectives: To observe the performance of the LMA Protector mask during short anesthesia procedures in gynecology with or without muscle relaxants.

Methods: A total of 100 patients (aged 18-65 years old, BMI <35 kg/m2) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III, scheduled to undergo elective gynecologic surgery, with an expected operative time <1 hour, were randomly divided into 2 groups, that is, the muscle relaxant group and the control group. The patients were given 0.06 mg/kg cisatracurium or the same amount of normal saline. The primary outcome was postoperative sore throat, and the secondary outcomes were the postoperative adverse effects, recovery time, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), and the ease score of placements.

Results: There were no significant differences in postoperative sore throat, the amount of blood stained on the laryngeal mask, and other postoperative adverse effects in both groups. The OLP of LMA Protector in the muscle relaxant group was 32 cm H2O, which was significantly higher than the 28 cm H2O in the control group (P=0.0017). The ease of mask placement score was significantly lower in the muscle relaxant group at 2 (0-4) than in the control group at 3 (0-6) (P=0.042). The eye-opening time, laryngeal mask removal time, and leaving time in the muscle relaxant group were significantly longer than in the control group (all P<0.001).

Conclusions: The use of muscle relaxants does not affect postoperative sore throat associated with the LMA Protector mask, but facilitates the placement and also helped to improve OLP, thus improving mask tightness and enhancing the safety of the laryngeal mask.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信