粪肠球菌双β-内酰胺协同作用及其与青霉素-头孢曲松感染性心内膜炎治疗效果的关系

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
April Gregson, Shakeel Mowlaboccus, Sruthi Mamoottil Sudeep, Sophia Rizzo, Jignasa Purani, Elena Martinez, Geoffrey Coombs, Indy Sandaradura, Genevieve McKew
{"title":"粪肠球菌双β-内酰胺协同作用及其与青霉素-头孢曲松感染性心内膜炎治疗效果的关系","authors":"April Gregson, Shakeel Mowlaboccus, Sruthi Mamoottil Sudeep, Sophia Rizzo, Jignasa Purani, Elena Martinez, Geoffrey Coombs, Indy Sandaradura, Genevieve McKew","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Benzylpenicillin with ceftriaxone is used for outpatient antimicrobial therapy of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) due to poor stability of aminopenicillins. The aim was to correlate the impact of benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy on EFIE treated with benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone, and investigate whether simpler phenotypic methods can predict synergy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical outcomes of a retrospective cohort of EFIE patients were correlated with treatment and synergy. Isolates were assessed for synergy using the checkerboard method, compared with double disc diffusion (DDD) and layered and crossed gradient diffusion strip (GDS) tests, with sensitivity and specificity of these methods calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight episodes of EFIE in 34 patients were included; the majority received benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone alone (n = 16) or in sequence (n = 12; any benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone n = 28), and 10 received other regimens. There was no statistical difference between any benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone versus other therapies on outcomes, nor between benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy and outcome. GDS was an unreliable predictor of checkerboard synergy; DDD was reasonable. Five isolates lacked benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy (one also lacking ampicillin-ceftriaxone synergy); these all had high-level ceftriaxone resistance [zone diameter 6 mm, or broth microdilution (BMD) MIC >512 mg/L]. Most isolates from relapse cases developed reduced zone diameters to ceftriaxone. Two isolates lacking synergy had the same mutation near the ceftriaxone response regulator (CroR) binding site in the pbp4 promoter region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ceftriaxone susceptibility, either MIC <512 mg/L by BMD or disc zone diameter >6 mm, is the best predictor of ampicillin-ceftriaxone and particularly benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy in E. faecalis. There was no clear relationship between the absence of benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy and outcome in this highly comorbid cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual β-lactam synergy in Enterococcus faecalis and its relationship with penicillin-ceftriaxone infective endocarditis treatment outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"April Gregson, Shakeel Mowlaboccus, Sruthi Mamoottil Sudeep, Sophia Rizzo, Jignasa Purani, Elena Martinez, Geoffrey Coombs, Indy Sandaradura, Genevieve McKew\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jac/dkaf377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Benzylpenicillin with ceftriaxone is used for outpatient antimicrobial therapy of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) due to poor stability of aminopenicillins. The aim was to correlate the impact of benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy on EFIE treated with benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone, and investigate whether simpler phenotypic methods can predict synergy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical outcomes of a retrospective cohort of EFIE patients were correlated with treatment and synergy. Isolates were assessed for synergy using the checkerboard method, compared with double disc diffusion (DDD) and layered and crossed gradient diffusion strip (GDS) tests, with sensitivity and specificity of these methods calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight episodes of EFIE in 34 patients were included; the majority received benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone alone (n = 16) or in sequence (n = 12; any benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone n = 28), and 10 received other regimens. There was no statistical difference between any benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone versus other therapies on outcomes, nor between benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy and outcome. GDS was an unreliable predictor of checkerboard synergy; DDD was reasonable. Five isolates lacked benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy (one also lacking ampicillin-ceftriaxone synergy); these all had high-level ceftriaxone resistance [zone diameter 6 mm, or broth microdilution (BMD) MIC >512 mg/L]. Most isolates from relapse cases developed reduced zone diameters to ceftriaxone. Two isolates lacking synergy had the same mutation near the ceftriaxone response regulator (CroR) binding site in the pbp4 promoter region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ceftriaxone susceptibility, either MIC <512 mg/L by BMD or disc zone diameter >6 mm, is the best predictor of ampicillin-ceftriaxone and particularly benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy in E. faecalis. There was no clear relationship between the absence of benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy and outcome in this highly comorbid cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf377\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf377","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于氨霉素稳定性差,门诊采用青霉素联合头孢曲松治疗粪肠球菌感染性心内膜炎(EFIE)。目的是探讨青霉素-头孢曲松协同作用对头孢曲松治疗的EFIE的影响,并探讨更简单的表型方法是否可以预测协同作用。方法:回顾性队列EFIE患者的临床结果与治疗和协同作用相关。采用棋盘法评估分离株的协同作用,并与双盘扩散(DDD)和分层交叉梯度扩散条(GDS)试验进行比较,计算这些方法的敏感性和特异性。结果:纳入34例患者38次EFIE发作;大多数患者单独使用苄青霉素-头孢曲松治疗(n = 16)或连续使用(n = 12;任意使用苄青霉素-头孢曲松治疗n = 28), 10例患者同时使用其他治疗方案。在结果上,任何苄青霉素-头孢曲松治疗与其他治疗之间没有统计学差异,苄青霉素-头孢曲松协同作用与结果之间也没有统计学差异。GDS是一个不可靠的棋盘协同预测指标;DDD合理。5株分离株缺乏苄青霉素-头孢曲松协同作用(1株也缺乏氨苄青霉素-头孢曲松协同作用);这些都有高水平的头孢曲松耐药性[区直径6 mm,或肉汤微量稀释(BMD) MIC >512 mg/L]。大多数复发病例的分离株对头孢曲松的区径减小。两个缺乏协同作用的分离株在pbp4启动子区域的头孢曲松反应调节因子(crr)结合位点附近有相同的突变。结论:头孢曲松敏感性(MIC为6 mm)是粪肠杆菌中氨苄青霉素-头孢曲松,尤其是苄青霉素-头孢曲松协同作用的最佳预测指标。在这个高度合并症的队列中,缺乏苄青霉素-头孢曲松协同作用与结果之间没有明确的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual β-lactam synergy in Enterococcus faecalis and its relationship with penicillin-ceftriaxone infective endocarditis treatment outcomes.

Objectives: Benzylpenicillin with ceftriaxone is used for outpatient antimicrobial therapy of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) due to poor stability of aminopenicillins. The aim was to correlate the impact of benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy on EFIE treated with benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone, and investigate whether simpler phenotypic methods can predict synergy.

Methods: Clinical outcomes of a retrospective cohort of EFIE patients were correlated with treatment and synergy. Isolates were assessed for synergy using the checkerboard method, compared with double disc diffusion (DDD) and layered and crossed gradient diffusion strip (GDS) tests, with sensitivity and specificity of these methods calculated.

Results: Thirty-eight episodes of EFIE in 34 patients were included; the majority received benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone alone (n = 16) or in sequence (n = 12; any benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone n = 28), and 10 received other regimens. There was no statistical difference between any benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone versus other therapies on outcomes, nor between benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy and outcome. GDS was an unreliable predictor of checkerboard synergy; DDD was reasonable. Five isolates lacked benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy (one also lacking ampicillin-ceftriaxone synergy); these all had high-level ceftriaxone resistance [zone diameter 6 mm, or broth microdilution (BMD) MIC >512 mg/L]. Most isolates from relapse cases developed reduced zone diameters to ceftriaxone. Two isolates lacking synergy had the same mutation near the ceftriaxone response regulator (CroR) binding site in the pbp4 promoter region.

Conclusions: Ceftriaxone susceptibility, either MIC <512 mg/L by BMD or disc zone diameter >6 mm, is the best predictor of ampicillin-ceftriaxone and particularly benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy in E. faecalis. There was no clear relationship between the absence of benzylpenicillin-ceftriaxone synergy and outcome in this highly comorbid cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信