超低厚度生物可降解聚合物与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架-一项24个月的临床随访研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Upendra Kaul, Pushpendra Kumar Garg, Rohit Chopra, Rahul Gupta, Vivek Mathur
{"title":"超低厚度生物可降解聚合物与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架-一项24个月的临床随访研究。","authors":"Upendra Kaul, Pushpendra Kumar Garg, Rohit Chopra, Rahul Gupta, Vivek Mathur","doi":"10.1016/j.ihj.2025.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A multicenter observational study of 2059 PCI patients compared the ultrathin-strut BDP-EES (Eternia) with the DP-EES (Xience) over 24 months. Patients in the Eternia group were older with more chronic total occlusions. MACE rates were 3.7 % (Xience) vs 3.8 % (Eternia; p = 0.939), with no significant differences in mortality, TVR, or stent thrombosis. No definite or probable stent thrombosis was reported in either group, and possible thrombosis rates were low (0.3 % vs 0.4 %). These findings suggest that biodegradable and durable polymer platforms offer similar long-term performance. The Eternia stents demonstrated equivalent safety and efficacy to Xience stents at 24 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":13384,"journal":{"name":"Indian heart journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultra-low thickness bio-degradable polymer vs durable polymer everolimus eluting stents - A 24 months clinical follow-up study.\",\"authors\":\"Upendra Kaul, Pushpendra Kumar Garg, Rohit Chopra, Rahul Gupta, Vivek Mathur\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ihj.2025.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A multicenter observational study of 2059 PCI patients compared the ultrathin-strut BDP-EES (Eternia) with the DP-EES (Xience) over 24 months. Patients in the Eternia group were older with more chronic total occlusions. MACE rates were 3.7 % (Xience) vs 3.8 % (Eternia; p = 0.939), with no significant differences in mortality, TVR, or stent thrombosis. No definite or probable stent thrombosis was reported in either group, and possible thrombosis rates were low (0.3 % vs 0.4 %). These findings suggest that biodegradable and durable polymer platforms offer similar long-term performance. The Eternia stents demonstrated equivalent safety and efficacy to Xience stents at 24 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian heart journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2025.10.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2025.10.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一项针对2059例PCI患者的多中心观察性研究比较了超薄支架BDP-EES (Eternia)和DP-EES (Xience) 24个月。Eternia组患者年龄较大,慢性全闭塞较多。MACE率分别为3.7% (Xience)和3.8% (Eternia; p=0.939),两者在死亡率、TVR或支架血栓形成方面无显著差异。两组均未报告明确或可能的支架血栓形成,可能的血栓发生率较低(0.3% vs 0.4%)。这些发现表明,可生物降解和耐用的聚合物平台具有类似的长期性能。在24个月时,Eternia支架显示出与Xience支架相同的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultra-low thickness bio-degradable polymer vs durable polymer everolimus eluting stents - A 24 months clinical follow-up study.

A multicenter observational study of 2059 PCI patients compared the ultrathin-strut BDP-EES (Eternia) with the DP-EES (Xience) over 24 months. Patients in the Eternia group were older with more chronic total occlusions. MACE rates were 3.7 % (Xience) vs 3.8 % (Eternia; p = 0.939), with no significant differences in mortality, TVR, or stent thrombosis. No definite or probable stent thrombosis was reported in either group, and possible thrombosis rates were low (0.3 % vs 0.4 %). These findings suggest that biodegradable and durable polymer platforms offer similar long-term performance. The Eternia stents demonstrated equivalent safety and efficacy to Xience stents at 24 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian heart journal
Indian heart journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Indian Heart Journal (IHJ) is the official peer-reviewed open access journal of Cardiological Society of India and accepts articles for publication from across the globe. The journal aims to promote high quality research and serve as a platform for dissemination of scientific information in cardiology with particular focus on South Asia. The journal aims to publish cutting edge research in the field of clinical as well as non-clinical cardiology - including cardiovascular medicine and surgery. Some of the topics covered are Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, Interventional Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery, Valvular Heart Disease, Pulmonary Hypertension and Infective Endocarditis. IHJ open access invites original research articles, research briefs, perspective, case reports, case vignette, cardiovascular images, cardiovascular graphics, research letters, correspondence, reader forum, and interesting photographs, for publication. IHJ open access also publishes theme-based special issues and abstracts of papers presented at the annual conference of the Cardiological Society of India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信