面向医疗保健专业人员的全球健康能力调查的中文版及其应用。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-10-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1624826
Xiaoxi Li, Junjie Jia, Jingjing Hu, Xuqi He, Meiqiong Zheng
{"title":"面向医疗保健专业人员的全球健康能力调查的中文版及其应用。","authors":"Xiaoxi Li, Junjie Jia, Jingjing Hu, Xuqi He, Meiqiong Zheng","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1624826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to introduce and validate the global health competencies survey (GHCS) in the Chinese healthcare context, addressing the need for a comprehensive tool to assess global health competencies among diverse healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The GHCS underwent meticulous translation and cultural adaptation, engaging 150 healthcare professionals from various disciplines between 1<sup>st</sup> June and 10<sup>th</sup> December, 2023. The study employed a rigorous methodology involving instrument development, translation, data collection, and statistical analysis. Face and content validity, factor analysis, and internal consistency were assessed to validate the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translated GHCS demonstrated robust reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.841) and validity. The survey identified competencies, showcased temporal trends, and informed targeted interventions. No floor or ceiling effects were observed, except for one variable (racial/ethnic disparities).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adapted and validated GHCS emerges as a valuable tool for assessing global health competencies among Chinese healthcare professionals. Implications for research use include identifying knowledge gaps, facilitating program improvements, and contributing to reduced health inequities. Despite limitations, such as the absence of criterion validation and Mandarin administration, the GHCS offers a foundation for further research and program enhancements in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1624826"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12521418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chinese version and application of the global health competencies survey for healthcare professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxi Li, Junjie Jia, Jingjing Hu, Xuqi He, Meiqiong Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1624826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to introduce and validate the global health competencies survey (GHCS) in the Chinese healthcare context, addressing the need for a comprehensive tool to assess global health competencies among diverse healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The GHCS underwent meticulous translation and cultural adaptation, engaging 150 healthcare professionals from various disciplines between 1<sup>st</sup> June and 10<sup>th</sup> December, 2023. The study employed a rigorous methodology involving instrument development, translation, data collection, and statistical analysis. Face and content validity, factor analysis, and internal consistency were assessed to validate the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translated GHCS demonstrated robust reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.841) and validity. The survey identified competencies, showcased temporal trends, and informed targeted interventions. No floor or ceiling effects were observed, except for one variable (racial/ethnic disparities).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adapted and validated GHCS emerges as a valuable tool for assessing global health competencies among Chinese healthcare professionals. Implications for research use include identifying knowledge gaps, facilitating program improvements, and contributing to reduced health inequities. Despite limitations, such as the absence of criterion validation and Mandarin administration, the GHCS offers a foundation for further research and program enhancements in China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1624826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12521418/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1624826\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1624826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在介绍和验证全球健康能力调查(GHCS)在中国的医疗保健背景下,解决需要一个全面的工具来评估不同的医疗保健专业人员的全球健康能力。方法:在2023年6月1日至12月10日期间,150名来自不同学科的医疗保健专业人员对GHCS进行了细致的翻译和文化适应。该研究采用了包括仪器开发、翻译、数据收集和统计分析在内的严格方法。评估问卷的面效度、内容效度、因子分析及内部一致性。结果:翻译后的GHCS具有良好的信度(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.841)和效度。调查确定了能力,展示了时间趋势,并为有针对性的干预提供了信息。除了一个变量(种族/民族差异)外,没有观察到下限或上限效应。结论:经过调整和验证的GHCS是评估中国医疗保健专业人员全球卫生能力的宝贵工具。对研究使用的影响包括确定知识差距,促进规划改进,并有助于减少卫生不公平现象。尽管存在一些限制,如缺乏标准验证和普通话管理,但GHCS为中国的进一步研究和项目改进提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chinese version and application of the global health competencies survey for healthcare professionals.

Objective: This study aimed to introduce and validate the global health competencies survey (GHCS) in the Chinese healthcare context, addressing the need for a comprehensive tool to assess global health competencies among diverse healthcare professionals.

Methods: The GHCS underwent meticulous translation and cultural adaptation, engaging 150 healthcare professionals from various disciplines between 1st June and 10th December, 2023. The study employed a rigorous methodology involving instrument development, translation, data collection, and statistical analysis. Face and content validity, factor analysis, and internal consistency were assessed to validate the survey.

Results: The translated GHCS demonstrated robust reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.841) and validity. The survey identified competencies, showcased temporal trends, and informed targeted interventions. No floor or ceiling effects were observed, except for one variable (racial/ethnic disparities).

Conclusion: The adapted and validated GHCS emerges as a valuable tool for assessing global health competencies among Chinese healthcare professionals. Implications for research use include identifying knowledge gaps, facilitating program improvements, and contributing to reduced health inequities. Despite limitations, such as the absence of criterion validation and Mandarin administration, the GHCS offers a foundation for further research and program enhancements in China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信