{"title":"面向医疗保健专业人员的全球健康能力调查的中文版及其应用。","authors":"Xiaoxi Li, Junjie Jia, Jingjing Hu, Xuqi He, Meiqiong Zheng","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1624826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to introduce and validate the global health competencies survey (GHCS) in the Chinese healthcare context, addressing the need for a comprehensive tool to assess global health competencies among diverse healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The GHCS underwent meticulous translation and cultural adaptation, engaging 150 healthcare professionals from various disciplines between 1<sup>st</sup> June and 10<sup>th</sup> December, 2023. The study employed a rigorous methodology involving instrument development, translation, data collection, and statistical analysis. Face and content validity, factor analysis, and internal consistency were assessed to validate the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translated GHCS demonstrated robust reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.841) and validity. The survey identified competencies, showcased temporal trends, and informed targeted interventions. No floor or ceiling effects were observed, except for one variable (racial/ethnic disparities).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adapted and validated GHCS emerges as a valuable tool for assessing global health competencies among Chinese healthcare professionals. Implications for research use include identifying knowledge gaps, facilitating program improvements, and contributing to reduced health inequities. Despite limitations, such as the absence of criterion validation and Mandarin administration, the GHCS offers a foundation for further research and program enhancements in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1624826"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12521418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chinese version and application of the global health competencies survey for healthcare professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxi Li, Junjie Jia, Jingjing Hu, Xuqi He, Meiqiong Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1624826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to introduce and validate the global health competencies survey (GHCS) in the Chinese healthcare context, addressing the need for a comprehensive tool to assess global health competencies among diverse healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The GHCS underwent meticulous translation and cultural adaptation, engaging 150 healthcare professionals from various disciplines between 1<sup>st</sup> June and 10<sup>th</sup> December, 2023. The study employed a rigorous methodology involving instrument development, translation, data collection, and statistical analysis. Face and content validity, factor analysis, and internal consistency were assessed to validate the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translated GHCS demonstrated robust reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.841) and validity. The survey identified competencies, showcased temporal trends, and informed targeted interventions. No floor or ceiling effects were observed, except for one variable (racial/ethnic disparities).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adapted and validated GHCS emerges as a valuable tool for assessing global health competencies among Chinese healthcare professionals. Implications for research use include identifying knowledge gaps, facilitating program improvements, and contributing to reduced health inequities. Despite limitations, such as the absence of criterion validation and Mandarin administration, the GHCS offers a foundation for further research and program enhancements in China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1624826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12521418/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1624826\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1624826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chinese version and application of the global health competencies survey for healthcare professionals.
Objective: This study aimed to introduce and validate the global health competencies survey (GHCS) in the Chinese healthcare context, addressing the need for a comprehensive tool to assess global health competencies among diverse healthcare professionals.
Methods: The GHCS underwent meticulous translation and cultural adaptation, engaging 150 healthcare professionals from various disciplines between 1st June and 10th December, 2023. The study employed a rigorous methodology involving instrument development, translation, data collection, and statistical analysis. Face and content validity, factor analysis, and internal consistency were assessed to validate the survey.
Results: The translated GHCS demonstrated robust reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.841) and validity. The survey identified competencies, showcased temporal trends, and informed targeted interventions. No floor or ceiling effects were observed, except for one variable (racial/ethnic disparities).
Conclusion: The adapted and validated GHCS emerges as a valuable tool for assessing global health competencies among Chinese healthcare professionals. Implications for research use include identifying knowledge gaps, facilitating program improvements, and contributing to reduced health inequities. Despite limitations, such as the absence of criterion validation and Mandarin administration, the GHCS offers a foundation for further research and program enhancements in China.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice.
Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.