脓毒性休克患者的靶向组织灌注与大循环引导的标准治疗:一项随机临床试验- tartars试验。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ville Pettilä, Carmen A Pfortmüller, Anders Perner, Tobias M Merz, Erika Wilkman, Johanna Hästbacka, Matthias F Lang, Paolo Lombardo, Tuomas Selander, Stephan M Jakob, Jukka Takala
{"title":"脓毒性休克患者的靶向组织灌注与大循环引导的标准治疗:一项随机临床试验- tartars试验。","authors":"Ville Pettilä, Carmen A Pfortmüller, Anders Perner, Tobias M Merz, Erika Wilkman, Johanna Hästbacka, Matthias F Lang, Paolo Lombardo, Tuomas Selander, Stephan M Jakob, Jukka Takala","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether treatment targeting improving tissue perfusion while allowing lower than recommended blood pressure (targeted tissue perfusion [TTP]) improves outcome compared with mean arterial pressure (MAP)-guided standard care (SC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial with 30-day follow-up. Allocation was stratified according to trial site and presence of chronic arterial hypertension.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three European university hospital ICUs with enrollment from 2016 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Two hundred nineteen patients with septic shock and blood lactate greater than 3 mmol/L allocated to TTP (n = 111) vs. SC (n = 108).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The TTP protocol comprised capillary refill time, peripheral skin temperature, arterial lactate concentrations, and MAP 50-65 mm Hg. The SC protocol comprised the hemodynamic targets of 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Ninety-seven (87.4%) in TTP and 97 (89.8%) in SC group (total n = 194) were analyzed for the primary outcome. The median (interquartile range) of days alive in 30 days with normal lactate and without vasopressor/inotropic drugs (primary outcome) was 23 (10-27) in TTP group and 22 (1-27) in SC group (difference in medians, 0.59; 95% CI, -3 to 4). Secondary outcomes (single components of the primary outcome, days alive without organ support and mortality, all at 30 d) and serious adverse reactions were not significantly different between intervention groups. At day 30, 24 patients (24.7%) in TTP group vs. 27 patients (27.8%) in SC group had died. MAP levels were lower in the TTP group vs. the SC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ICU patients with septic shock and lactate greater than 3 mmol/L, targeting tissue perfusion and allowing lower than recommended MAP did not increase the number of days alive with normal lactate and without vasopressor/inotropic drugs at 30 days. No additional safety concerns with the TTP strategy were detected compared with SC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeted Tissue Perfusion Versus Macrocirculatory-Guided Standard Care in Patients With Septic Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial-The TARTARE-2S Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ville Pettilä, Carmen A Pfortmüller, Anders Perner, Tobias M Merz, Erika Wilkman, Johanna Hästbacka, Matthias F Lang, Paolo Lombardo, Tuomas Selander, Stephan M Jakob, Jukka Takala\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether treatment targeting improving tissue perfusion while allowing lower than recommended blood pressure (targeted tissue perfusion [TTP]) improves outcome compared with mean arterial pressure (MAP)-guided standard care (SC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial with 30-day follow-up. Allocation was stratified according to trial site and presence of chronic arterial hypertension.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three European university hospital ICUs with enrollment from 2016 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Two hundred nineteen patients with septic shock and blood lactate greater than 3 mmol/L allocated to TTP (n = 111) vs. SC (n = 108).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The TTP protocol comprised capillary refill time, peripheral skin temperature, arterial lactate concentrations, and MAP 50-65 mm Hg. The SC protocol comprised the hemodynamic targets of 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Ninety-seven (87.4%) in TTP and 97 (89.8%) in SC group (total n = 194) were analyzed for the primary outcome. The median (interquartile range) of days alive in 30 days with normal lactate and without vasopressor/inotropic drugs (primary outcome) was 23 (10-27) in TTP group and 22 (1-27) in SC group (difference in medians, 0.59; 95% CI, -3 to 4). Secondary outcomes (single components of the primary outcome, days alive without organ support and mortality, all at 30 d) and serious adverse reactions were not significantly different between intervention groups. At day 30, 24 patients (24.7%) in TTP group vs. 27 patients (27.8%) in SC group had died. MAP levels were lower in the TTP group vs. the SC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ICU patients with septic shock and lactate greater than 3 mmol/L, targeting tissue perfusion and allowing lower than recommended MAP did not increase the number of days alive with normal lactate and without vasopressor/inotropic drugs at 30 days. No additional safety concerns with the TTP strategy were detected compared with SC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006899\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006899","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定与平均动脉压(MAP)引导的标准治疗(SC)相比,以改善组织灌注为目标,同时允许低于推荐血压的治疗(targeted tissue perfusion [TTP])是否能改善预后。设计:随机、平行组、开放标签临床试验,随访30天。根据试验地点和是否存在慢性动脉高血压进行分层分配。设置:2016 - 2022年欧洲大学医院三所icu。患者:219例感染性休克和血乳酸浓度大于3mmol /L的患者分配到TTP组(n = 111)和SC组(n = 108)。干预措施:TTP方案包括毛细血管再充血时间、外周皮肤温度、动脉乳酸浓度和MAP 50-65 mm Hg。SC方案包括2012年存活脓毒症运动的血流动力学目标。测量方法及主要结果:TTP组97例(87.4%),SC组97例(89.8%)(总n = 194)进行主要结局分析。在乳酸水平正常且不服用血管加压剂/肌力药物(主要结局)的情况下,30天内存活天数的中位数(四分位数范围)为TTP组23天(10-27天),SC组22天(1-27天)(中位数差异为0.59;95% CI, -3至4)。次要结局(主要结局的单一组成部分,无器官支持存活天数和死亡率,均为30 d)和严重不良反应在干预组之间无显著差异。第30天,TTP组24例(24.7%)死亡,SC组27例(27.8%)死亡。与SC组相比,TTP组的MAP水平较低。结论:在脓毒性休克且乳酸浓度大于3 mmol/L的ICU患者中,针对组织灌注并允许低于推荐的MAP,在30天内乳酸浓度正常且不使用血管加压/肌力药物的情况下,并没有增加存活天数。与SC相比,TTP策略没有发现额外的安全问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Targeted Tissue Perfusion Versus Macrocirculatory-Guided Standard Care in Patients With Septic Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial-The TARTARE-2S Trial.

Objectives: To determine whether treatment targeting improving tissue perfusion while allowing lower than recommended blood pressure (targeted tissue perfusion [TTP]) improves outcome compared with mean arterial pressure (MAP)-guided standard care (SC).

Design: A randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial with 30-day follow-up. Allocation was stratified according to trial site and presence of chronic arterial hypertension.

Setting: Three European university hospital ICUs with enrollment from 2016 to 2022.

Patients: Two hundred nineteen patients with septic shock and blood lactate greater than 3 mmol/L allocated to TTP (n = 111) vs. SC (n = 108).

Interventions: The TTP protocol comprised capillary refill time, peripheral skin temperature, arterial lactate concentrations, and MAP 50-65 mm Hg. The SC protocol comprised the hemodynamic targets of 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign.

Measurements and main results: Ninety-seven (87.4%) in TTP and 97 (89.8%) in SC group (total n = 194) were analyzed for the primary outcome. The median (interquartile range) of days alive in 30 days with normal lactate and without vasopressor/inotropic drugs (primary outcome) was 23 (10-27) in TTP group and 22 (1-27) in SC group (difference in medians, 0.59; 95% CI, -3 to 4). Secondary outcomes (single components of the primary outcome, days alive without organ support and mortality, all at 30 d) and serious adverse reactions were not significantly different between intervention groups. At day 30, 24 patients (24.7%) in TTP group vs. 27 patients (27.8%) in SC group had died. MAP levels were lower in the TTP group vs. the SC group.

Conclusions: In ICU patients with septic shock and lactate greater than 3 mmol/L, targeting tissue perfusion and allowing lower than recommended MAP did not increase the number of days alive with normal lactate and without vasopressor/inotropic drugs at 30 days. No additional safety concerns with the TTP strategy were detected compared with SC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信