微创胃切除术治疗Borrmann IV型胃癌:一种肿瘤良性替代开放手术。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Jawon Hwang, Ki-Yoon Kim, Sung Hyun Park, Minah Cho, Yoo Min Kim, Hyoung-Il Kim, Woo Jin Hyung
{"title":"微创胃切除术治疗Borrmann IV型胃癌:一种肿瘤良性替代开放手术。","authors":"Jawon Hwang, Ki-Yoon Kim, Sung Hyun Park, Minah Cho, Yoo Min Kim, Hyoung-Il Kim, Woo Jin Hyung","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18573-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have validated the oncologic safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for advanced gastric cancer, but the feasibility of applying MIS to treat Borrmann type IV gastric cancer remains unclear. Given its distinct clinicopathological features, poor prognosis, and technical complexities in surgery, further investigation is needed. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes between open surgery and MIS in patients with Borrmann type IV gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from 1025 patients who underwent open (n = 888) or minimally invasive (n = 137) gastrectomy for Borrmann type IV gastric cancer between 2003 and 2021. Propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics, and short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the matched groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, each group included 112 matched patients. The MIS group had longer operative times (p < 0.001) but shorter hospital stays (p < 0.001) than the open surgery group. Other perioperative outcomes showed no significant differences. Overall and recurrence-free survival were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.741 and p = 0.707, respectively). Adjusted hazard ratios for death and recurrence following MIS compared with open surgery were 1.20 (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.85, p = 0.396) and 1.22 (95% confidence interval 0.83-1.79, p = 0.308), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that MIS for Borrmann type IV gastric cancer may offer long-term oncologic outcomes comparable to those with open surgery while preserving the inherent benefits of MIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy for Borrmann Type IV Gastric Cancer: An Oncologically Sound Alternative to Open Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Jawon Hwang, Ki-Yoon Kim, Sung Hyun Park, Minah Cho, Yoo Min Kim, Hyoung-Il Kim, Woo Jin Hyung\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-18573-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have validated the oncologic safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for advanced gastric cancer, but the feasibility of applying MIS to treat Borrmann type IV gastric cancer remains unclear. Given its distinct clinicopathological features, poor prognosis, and technical complexities in surgery, further investigation is needed. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes between open surgery and MIS in patients with Borrmann type IV gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from 1025 patients who underwent open (n = 888) or minimally invasive (n = 137) gastrectomy for Borrmann type IV gastric cancer between 2003 and 2021. Propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics, and short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the matched groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, each group included 112 matched patients. The MIS group had longer operative times (p < 0.001) but shorter hospital stays (p < 0.001) than the open surgery group. Other perioperative outcomes showed no significant differences. Overall and recurrence-free survival were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.741 and p = 0.707, respectively). Adjusted hazard ratios for death and recurrence following MIS compared with open surgery were 1.20 (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.85, p = 0.396) and 1.22 (95% confidence interval 0.83-1.79, p = 0.308), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that MIS for Borrmann type IV gastric cancer may offer long-term oncologic outcomes comparable to those with open surgery while preserving the inherent benefits of MIS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18573-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18573-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:已有研究证实微创手术(MIS)治疗晚期胃癌的肿瘤学安全性,但应用MIS治疗Borrmann IV型胃癌的可行性尚不清楚。鉴于其独特的临床病理特征,预后差,手术技术复杂,需要进一步研究。本研究旨在比较开放手术和MIS治疗Borrmann IV型胃癌的手术和肿瘤预后。方法:我们回顾性分析2003年至2021年间1025例Borrmann IV型胃癌患者的资料,这些患者接受了开放(n = 888)或微创(n = 137)胃切除术。进行倾向评分匹配以平衡基线特征,并比较匹配组之间的短期和长期结果。结果:经倾向评分匹配后,每组纳入112例匹配患者。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在保留MIS固有益处的同时,MIS治疗Borrmann IV型胃癌可能提供与开放手术相当的长期肿瘤预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy for Borrmann Type IV Gastric Cancer: An Oncologically Sound Alternative to Open Surgery.

Background: Previous studies have validated the oncologic safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for advanced gastric cancer, but the feasibility of applying MIS to treat Borrmann type IV gastric cancer remains unclear. Given its distinct clinicopathological features, poor prognosis, and technical complexities in surgery, further investigation is needed. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes between open surgery and MIS in patients with Borrmann type IV gastric cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 1025 patients who underwent open (n = 888) or minimally invasive (n = 137) gastrectomy for Borrmann type IV gastric cancer between 2003 and 2021. Propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics, and short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the matched groups.

Results: After propensity score matching, each group included 112 matched patients. The MIS group had longer operative times (p < 0.001) but shorter hospital stays (p < 0.001) than the open surgery group. Other perioperative outcomes showed no significant differences. Overall and recurrence-free survival were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.741 and p = 0.707, respectively). Adjusted hazard ratios for death and recurrence following MIS compared with open surgery were 1.20 (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.85, p = 0.396) and 1.22 (95% confidence interval 0.83-1.79, p = 0.308), respectively.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that MIS for Borrmann type IV gastric cancer may offer long-term oncologic outcomes comparable to those with open surgery while preserving the inherent benefits of MIS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信