围神经侵犯恶化胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤手术切除后的长期预后。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Hui Xu, Jing-Jing Hou, Jun-Xi Xiang, Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar, George Poultsides, Flavio Rocha, Sharon Weber, Ryan Fields, Kamran Idrees, Cliff Cho, Shishir K Maithel, Yi Lv, Xu-Feng Zhang, Timothy M Pawlik
{"title":"围神经侵犯恶化胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤手术切除后的长期预后。","authors":"Hui Xu, Jing-Jing Hou, Jun-Xi Xiang, Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar, George Poultsides, Flavio Rocha, Sharon Weber, Ryan Fields, Kamran Idrees, Cliff Cho, Shishir K Maithel, Yi Lv, Xu-Feng Zhang, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18561-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To define the impact of perineural invasion (PNI) on long-term survival of patients following curative-intent resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with pNETs who underwent curative-intent resection (R0/R1) between 2000 and 2020 were identified from a multi-institutional database. The impacts of PNI on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 700 patients, 171 (n = 24.4%) had a pNET with PNI. The presence of PNI was associated with higher tumor grade (G3, 8.2% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.001), more advanced AJCC T disease (T3-T4, 58.5% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001), and a higher incidence of nodal metastasis (52.6% vs. 21.2%, p < 0.001) versus patients with no PNI. Patients with PNI had a worse OS (median, with PNI 115.9 months vs. no PNI not reached, p < 0.001) and DFS (median, with PNI 51.9 vs. no PNI 115.4 months, p < 0.001) versus patients with no PNI. On multivariable analysis PNI was an independent risk factor associated with worse OS (HR = 2.624, 95%CI 1.475-4.668, p = 0.001), as well as DFS (HR = 1.972, 95%CI 1.396-2.786, p < 0.001). Among 256 patients with very early staged tumors (G1N0) who underwent an R0 resection, PNI remained a strong independent factor associated with worse long-term survivals (OS, HR = 3.892, 95%CI 1.196-12.662, p = 0.024; DFS, HR = 2.530, 95%CI 1.010-6.339, p = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PNI was an independent adverse prognostic factor among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pNETs, even among individuals with early-stage disease. The presence of PNI should be routinely assessed and considered in the prognostic stratification of patients following resection of pNETs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perineural Invasion Worsens Long-Term Outcomes of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Following Surgical Resection.\",\"authors\":\"Hui Xu, Jing-Jing Hou, Jun-Xi Xiang, Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar, George Poultsides, Flavio Rocha, Sharon Weber, Ryan Fields, Kamran Idrees, Cliff Cho, Shishir K Maithel, Yi Lv, Xu-Feng Zhang, Timothy M Pawlik\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-18561-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To define the impact of perineural invasion (PNI) on long-term survival of patients following curative-intent resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with pNETs who underwent curative-intent resection (R0/R1) between 2000 and 2020 were identified from a multi-institutional database. The impacts of PNI on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 700 patients, 171 (n = 24.4%) had a pNET with PNI. The presence of PNI was associated with higher tumor grade (G3, 8.2% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.001), more advanced AJCC T disease (T3-T4, 58.5% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001), and a higher incidence of nodal metastasis (52.6% vs. 21.2%, p < 0.001) versus patients with no PNI. Patients with PNI had a worse OS (median, with PNI 115.9 months vs. no PNI not reached, p < 0.001) and DFS (median, with PNI 51.9 vs. no PNI 115.4 months, p < 0.001) versus patients with no PNI. On multivariable analysis PNI was an independent risk factor associated with worse OS (HR = 2.624, 95%CI 1.475-4.668, p = 0.001), as well as DFS (HR = 1.972, 95%CI 1.396-2.786, p < 0.001). Among 256 patients with very early staged tumors (G1N0) who underwent an R0 resection, PNI remained a strong independent factor associated with worse long-term survivals (OS, HR = 3.892, 95%CI 1.196-12.662, p = 0.024; DFS, HR = 2.530, 95%CI 1.010-6.339, p = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PNI was an independent adverse prognostic factor among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pNETs, even among individuals with early-stage disease. The presence of PNI should be routinely assessed and considered in the prognostic stratification of patients following resection of pNETs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18561-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18561-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:探讨围神经侵犯(PNI)对胰神经内分泌肿瘤(pNETs)术后患者长期生存的影响。患者和方法:从多机构数据库中确定2000年至2020年间接受治愈性切除(R0/R1)的pNETs患者。分析PNI对总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的影响。结果:在700例患者中,171例(n = 24.4%)有pNET合并PNI。与没有PNI的患者相比,PNI的存在与更高的肿瘤分级(G3, 8.2%对2.5%,p < 0.001)、更晚期的AJCC T疾病(T3-T4, 58.5%对15.9%,p < 0.001)和更高的淋巴结转移发生率(52.6%对21.2%,p < 0.001)相关。PNI患者的OS(中位数,PNI为115.9个月vs.未达到PNI, p < 0.001)和DFS(中位数,PNI为51.9个月vs.无PNI为115.4个月,p < 0.001)较无PNI患者更差。在多变量分析中,PNI是与较差的OS (HR = 2.624, 95%CI 1.475 ~ 4.668, p = 0.001)和DFS (HR = 1.972, 95%CI 1.396 ~ 2.786, p < 0.001)相关的独立危险因素。在256例接受R0切除术的极早期肿瘤(G1N0)患者中,PNI仍然是与较差的长期生存相关的强大独立因素(OS, HR = 3.892, 95%CI 1.196-12.662, p = 0.024; DFS, HR = 2.530, 95%CI 1.010-6.339, p = 0.048)。结论:PNI在接受治疗目的pNETs切除术的患者中是一个独立的不良预后因素,即使在早期疾病患者中也是如此。PNI的存在应在pNETs切除术后患者的预后分层中进行常规评估和考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perineural Invasion Worsens Long-Term Outcomes of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Following Surgical Resection.

Background: To define the impact of perineural invasion (PNI) on long-term survival of patients following curative-intent resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs).

Patients and methods: Patients with pNETs who underwent curative-intent resection (R0/R1) between 2000 and 2020 were identified from a multi-institutional database. The impacts of PNI on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed.

Results: Among 700 patients, 171 (n = 24.4%) had a pNET with PNI. The presence of PNI was associated with higher tumor grade (G3, 8.2% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.001), more advanced AJCC T disease (T3-T4, 58.5% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001), and a higher incidence of nodal metastasis (52.6% vs. 21.2%, p < 0.001) versus patients with no PNI. Patients with PNI had a worse OS (median, with PNI 115.9 months vs. no PNI not reached, p < 0.001) and DFS (median, with PNI 51.9 vs. no PNI 115.4 months, p < 0.001) versus patients with no PNI. On multivariable analysis PNI was an independent risk factor associated with worse OS (HR = 2.624, 95%CI 1.475-4.668, p = 0.001), as well as DFS (HR = 1.972, 95%CI 1.396-2.786, p < 0.001). Among 256 patients with very early staged tumors (G1N0) who underwent an R0 resection, PNI remained a strong independent factor associated with worse long-term survivals (OS, HR = 3.892, 95%CI 1.196-12.662, p = 0.024; DFS, HR = 2.530, 95%CI 1.010-6.339, p = 0.048).

Conclusions: PNI was an independent adverse prognostic factor among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pNETs, even among individuals with early-stage disease. The presence of PNI should be routinely assessed and considered in the prognostic stratification of patients following resection of pNETs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信