与骑自行车的人穿过道路时,驾驶员在城市十字路口的注意事项。

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Christer Ahlström , Katja Kircher , Fredrik Johansson , Anders Andersson , Johan Olstam
{"title":"与骑自行车的人穿过道路时,驾驶员在城市十字路口的注意事项。","authors":"Christer Ahlström ,&nbsp;Katja Kircher ,&nbsp;Fredrik Johansson ,&nbsp;Anders Andersson ,&nbsp;Johan Olstam","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conflicts arise when motor vehicles cross cycle paths during turns, often due to drivers neglecting over-the-shoulder glances. This paper examines the visual attention of car drivers at urban unsignalized intersections, considering turning direction, cross traffic, and cyclist approaching from behind.</div><div>A study with 44 participants was conducted using a fixed-base driving simulator equipped with an eXtended Reality (XR)-based visual system, which provided 360° immersion and enabled eye tracking for head movements and over-the-shoulder glances. Drivers were recruited based on urban cycling experience (inexperienced/experienced) and driving style (cautious/assertive).</div><div>Results showed that in 47.8 % of intersection approaches, participants failed to adequately check for cyclists from behind. Driver characteristics did not consistently reveal traits associated with this neglect. Although cautious drivers with urban cycling experience made fewer mistakes, all groups were generally poor at checking for cyclists from behind. Post-drive questionnaire results on rule knowledge showed that, across participants, only half of the requirements to check for cyclists approaching from behind were indicated correctly.</div><div>Drivers are more consistent in checking for cross-traffic, suggesting the neglect to check for cyclists is systemic rather than individual. The lack of awareness among drivers about their obligation to check for cyclists can be attributed to the less obvious nature of this traffic stream, as it comes from behind and lacks signs or warnings. Checking over the shoulder is physically more effortful, and cyclists may often pre-empt collisions, reinforcing drivers’ mental models to turn without checking. To improve safety, changes counteracting systemic biases against cyclists are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 108276"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driver attention in urban intersections when crossing paths with cyclists\",\"authors\":\"Christer Ahlström ,&nbsp;Katja Kircher ,&nbsp;Fredrik Johansson ,&nbsp;Anders Andersson ,&nbsp;Johan Olstam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Conflicts arise when motor vehicles cross cycle paths during turns, often due to drivers neglecting over-the-shoulder glances. This paper examines the visual attention of car drivers at urban unsignalized intersections, considering turning direction, cross traffic, and cyclist approaching from behind.</div><div>A study with 44 participants was conducted using a fixed-base driving simulator equipped with an eXtended Reality (XR)-based visual system, which provided 360° immersion and enabled eye tracking for head movements and over-the-shoulder glances. Drivers were recruited based on urban cycling experience (inexperienced/experienced) and driving style (cautious/assertive).</div><div>Results showed that in 47.8 % of intersection approaches, participants failed to adequately check for cyclists from behind. Driver characteristics did not consistently reveal traits associated with this neglect. Although cautious drivers with urban cycling experience made fewer mistakes, all groups were generally poor at checking for cyclists from behind. Post-drive questionnaire results on rule knowledge showed that, across participants, only half of the requirements to check for cyclists approaching from behind were indicated correctly.</div><div>Drivers are more consistent in checking for cross-traffic, suggesting the neglect to check for cyclists is systemic rather than individual. The lack of awareness among drivers about their obligation to check for cyclists can be attributed to the less obvious nature of this traffic stream, as it comes from behind and lacks signs or warnings. Checking over the shoulder is physically more effortful, and cyclists may often pre-empt collisions, reinforcing drivers’ mental models to turn without checking. To improve safety, changes counteracting systemic biases against cyclists are needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"volume\":\"223 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525003641\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525003641","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当机动车在转弯时穿过自行车道时,往往会发生冲突,这通常是由于司机忽视了看向肩膀。本文研究了在城市无信号交叉口,考虑转向方向,交叉交通和骑自行车者从后面接近的汽车司机的视觉注意力。一项有44名参与者参与的研究使用了一个固定底座的驾驶模拟器,该模拟器配备了基于扩展现实(XR)的视觉系统,可以提供360°沉浸感,并可以对头部运动和过肩的目光进行眼球追踪。司机是根据城市骑行经验(没有经验/有经验)和驾驶风格(谨慎/自信)招募的。结果显示,在47.8%的十字路口,参与者没有充分检查来自后面的骑车人。驾驶员的特征并不总是显示出与这种忽视相关的特征。尽管有城市骑行经验的谨慎司机犯错较少,但所有人群在检查后方骑行者方面都表现不佳。驾驶后关于规则知识的问卷调查结果显示,在所有参与者中,只有一半的要求检查从后面接近的骑自行车者被正确指示。司机在检查交叉交通时更加一致,这表明忽视检查骑自行车的人是系统的,而不是个人的。司机没有意识到他们有义务检查骑自行车的人,这可以归因于这种交通流的不太明显的性质,因为它来自后面,没有标志或警告。从身体上看,从肩膀上看更费力,骑自行车的人可能经常先发制人,从而加强了司机不检查就转弯的心理模式。为了提高安全性,需要改变对骑自行车者的系统性偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Driver attention in urban intersections when crossing paths with cyclists
Conflicts arise when motor vehicles cross cycle paths during turns, often due to drivers neglecting over-the-shoulder glances. This paper examines the visual attention of car drivers at urban unsignalized intersections, considering turning direction, cross traffic, and cyclist approaching from behind.
A study with 44 participants was conducted using a fixed-base driving simulator equipped with an eXtended Reality (XR)-based visual system, which provided 360° immersion and enabled eye tracking for head movements and over-the-shoulder glances. Drivers were recruited based on urban cycling experience (inexperienced/experienced) and driving style (cautious/assertive).
Results showed that in 47.8 % of intersection approaches, participants failed to adequately check for cyclists from behind. Driver characteristics did not consistently reveal traits associated with this neglect. Although cautious drivers with urban cycling experience made fewer mistakes, all groups were generally poor at checking for cyclists from behind. Post-drive questionnaire results on rule knowledge showed that, across participants, only half of the requirements to check for cyclists approaching from behind were indicated correctly.
Drivers are more consistent in checking for cross-traffic, suggesting the neglect to check for cyclists is systemic rather than individual. The lack of awareness among drivers about their obligation to check for cyclists can be attributed to the less obvious nature of this traffic stream, as it comes from behind and lacks signs or warnings. Checking over the shoulder is physically more effortful, and cyclists may often pre-empt collisions, reinforcing drivers’ mental models to turn without checking. To improve safety, changes counteracting systemic biases against cyclists are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信