蓝光滤光及优质人工晶体在术后跌倒中的作用:台湾一项全国性的目标试验模拟。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Jiahn-Shing Lee, Pei-Ru Li, Yi-Ling Hu, Ken-Kuo Lin, Lai-Chu See
{"title":"蓝光滤光及优质人工晶体在术后跌倒中的作用:台湾一项全国性的目标试验模拟。","authors":"Jiahn-Shing Lee, Pei-Ru Li, Yi-Ling Hu, Ken-Kuo Lin, Lai-Chu See","doi":"10.1016/j.bj.2025.100917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Falls are a leading cause of injury and premature death in older adults, and cataract surgery reduces fall risk. Concerns existed that blue-light filtering (BF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) might impair light transmittance and increase fall risk. We aimed to compare fall incidence and injury diagnoses among patients who received bilateral cataract surgery with premium BF, premium non-BF, and standard non-BF IOLs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We emulated a target trial by enrolling 26,730 well-matched patients per IOL cohort who underwent bilateral cataract surgeries between 2011 and 2017 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. They were followed until a fall, death, withdrawal, or December 31, 2022. Propensity score matching minimized baseline differences across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fall incidence increased over time, from 9.07 to 21.13 per 1,000 person-years. The premium BF-IOL (12.94) and premium non-BF-IOL (13.12) groups had lower fall rates than the standard non-BF-IOL group (14.85). Both Cox and Fine-Gray models showed significantly lower fall risks for premium BF-IOL (HR 0.86, SHR 0.92) and premium non-BF-IOL (HR 0.88, SHR 0.91) compared to standard IOLs. There was no significant difference in fall risk between premium BF-IOL and premium non-BF-IOL (HR/SHR 0.99). While hospitalization rates post-fall (68.6%) and 30-day fatal fall rate (1.29%) were comparable, standard IOLs were associated with significantly higher fracture rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no evidence that BF-IOLs increase fall incidence. Both premium IOL groups consistently had lower fall rates than standard non-BF-IOLs, suggesting that socioeconomic factors, in addition to IOL type, may contribute to this reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8934,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"100917"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Blue Light-Filtering and Premium Intraocular Lenses on Postoperative Falls: A Nationwide Target Trial Emulation in Taiwan.\",\"authors\":\"Jiahn-Shing Lee, Pei-Ru Li, Yi-Ling Hu, Ken-Kuo Lin, Lai-Chu See\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bj.2025.100917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Falls are a leading cause of injury and premature death in older adults, and cataract surgery reduces fall risk. Concerns existed that blue-light filtering (BF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) might impair light transmittance and increase fall risk. We aimed to compare fall incidence and injury diagnoses among patients who received bilateral cataract surgery with premium BF, premium non-BF, and standard non-BF IOLs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We emulated a target trial by enrolling 26,730 well-matched patients per IOL cohort who underwent bilateral cataract surgeries between 2011 and 2017 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. They were followed until a fall, death, withdrawal, or December 31, 2022. Propensity score matching minimized baseline differences across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fall incidence increased over time, from 9.07 to 21.13 per 1,000 person-years. The premium BF-IOL (12.94) and premium non-BF-IOL (13.12) groups had lower fall rates than the standard non-BF-IOL group (14.85). Both Cox and Fine-Gray models showed significantly lower fall risks for premium BF-IOL (HR 0.86, SHR 0.92) and premium non-BF-IOL (HR 0.88, SHR 0.91) compared to standard IOLs. There was no significant difference in fall risk between premium BF-IOL and premium non-BF-IOL (HR/SHR 0.99). While hospitalization rates post-fall (68.6%) and 30-day fatal fall rate (1.29%) were comparable, standard IOLs were associated with significantly higher fracture rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no evidence that BF-IOLs increase fall incidence. Both premium IOL groups consistently had lower fall rates than standard non-BF-IOLs, suggesting that socioeconomic factors, in addition to IOL type, may contribute to this reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100917\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2025.100917\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2025.100917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:跌倒是老年人受伤和过早死亡的主要原因,白内障手术可降低跌倒风险。人们担心蓝光过滤人工晶状体(iol)可能会降低透光率,增加跌倒的风险。我们的目的是比较双侧白内障手术中采用优质BF、优质非BF和标准非BF人工晶状体的患者的跌倒发生率和损伤诊断。​他们一直被跟踪,直到跌倒、死亡、退出,或2022年12月31日。倾向评分匹配最小化了各组之间的基线差异。结果:跌倒发生率随着时间的推移而增加,从每1000人年9.07人增加到21.13人。优质BF-IOL组(12.94)和优质非BF-IOL组(13.12)的下降率低于标准非BF-IOL组(14.85)。Cox和Fine-Gray模型均显示,与标准iol相比,优质BF-IOL (HR 0.86, SHR 0.92)和优质非BF-IOL (HR 0.88, SHR 0.91)的跌倒风险显著降低。优质BF-IOL与优质非BF-IOL之间的跌倒风险无显著差异(HR/SHR 0.99)。虽然跌倒后住院率(68.6%)和30天致命跌倒率(1.29%)具有可比性,但标准iol的骨折率明显较高。结论:我们没有发现bf - iol增加跌倒发生率的证据。两个高级人工晶状体组的下降率都低于标准的非bf型人工晶状体,这表明除了人工晶状体类型外,社会经济因素也可能导致这种下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Blue Light-Filtering and Premium Intraocular Lenses on Postoperative Falls: A Nationwide Target Trial Emulation in Taiwan.

Background: Falls are a leading cause of injury and premature death in older adults, and cataract surgery reduces fall risk. Concerns existed that blue-light filtering (BF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) might impair light transmittance and increase fall risk. We aimed to compare fall incidence and injury diagnoses among patients who received bilateral cataract surgery with premium BF, premium non-BF, and standard non-BF IOLs.

Material and methods: We emulated a target trial by enrolling 26,730 well-matched patients per IOL cohort who underwent bilateral cataract surgeries between 2011 and 2017 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. They were followed until a fall, death, withdrawal, or December 31, 2022. Propensity score matching minimized baseline differences across groups.

Results: Fall incidence increased over time, from 9.07 to 21.13 per 1,000 person-years. The premium BF-IOL (12.94) and premium non-BF-IOL (13.12) groups had lower fall rates than the standard non-BF-IOL group (14.85). Both Cox and Fine-Gray models showed significantly lower fall risks for premium BF-IOL (HR 0.86, SHR 0.92) and premium non-BF-IOL (HR 0.88, SHR 0.91) compared to standard IOLs. There was no significant difference in fall risk between premium BF-IOL and premium non-BF-IOL (HR/SHR 0.99). While hospitalization rates post-fall (68.6%) and 30-day fatal fall rate (1.29%) were comparable, standard IOLs were associated with significantly higher fracture rates.

Conclusions: We found no evidence that BF-IOLs increase fall incidence. Both premium IOL groups consistently had lower fall rates than standard non-BF-IOLs, suggesting that socioeconomic factors, in addition to IOL type, may contribute to this reduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Journal
Biomedical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Biomedical Journal publishes 6 peer-reviewed issues per year in all fields of clinical and biomedical sciences for an internationally diverse authorship. Unlike most open access journals, which are free to readers but not authors, Biomedical Journal does not charge for subscription, submission, processing or publication of manuscripts, nor for color reproduction of photographs. Clinical studies, accounts of clinical trials, biomarker studies, and characterization of human pathogens are within the scope of the journal, as well as basic studies in model species such as Escherichia coli, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Mus musculus revealing the function of molecules, cells, and tissues relevant for human health. However, articles on other species can be published if they contribute to our understanding of basic mechanisms of biology. A highly-cited international editorial board assures timely publication of manuscripts. Reviews on recent progress in biomedical sciences are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信