假定的“分散适应”并不能解释维管植物在火山岛的殖民,但鸟类可以。

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2025-10-16 DOI:10.1111/ele.70234
Pawel Wasowicz, Ádám Lovas-Kiss, Nándor Szabó, Andy J. Green
{"title":"假定的“分散适应”并不能解释维管植物在火山岛的殖民,但鸟类可以。","authors":"Pawel Wasowicz,&nbsp;Ádám Lovas-Kiss,&nbsp;Nándor Szabó,&nbsp;Andy J. Green","doi":"10.1111/ele.70234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dispersal syndromes based on traits assumed to be adaptations for specific dispersal mechanisms are routinely assigned to flowering plants. Using the colonisation record from a volcanic island formed in 1963, we assess whether dispersal syndromes predict which species establish on newly formed land. We evaluated the long-distance dispersal (LDD) syndromes of the 78 plant species using three European classification systems. Syndrome assignments were inconsistent between classifications (coinciding for ≤ 13% of species). Two systems showed no evidence that LDD syndromes conferred a colonisation advantage. The third classification suggested wind syndromes were favoured, but only assigned a minority of colonisers to LDD syndromes. ‘Unassisted’ species assumed to lack dispersal adaptations were dominant. However, empirical evidence supports endozoochory via aquatic birds for 62 colonisers. This suggests bird-dispersal is a major driver of colonisation for dry-fruited plants, and underscores the need for new approaches to plant dispersal that account for overlooked plant–animal interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"28 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70234","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Putative ‘Dispersal Adaptations’ Do Not Explain the Colonisation of a Volcanic Island by Vascular Plants, but Birds Can\",\"authors\":\"Pawel Wasowicz,&nbsp;Ádám Lovas-Kiss,&nbsp;Nándor Szabó,&nbsp;Andy J. Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ele.70234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Dispersal syndromes based on traits assumed to be adaptations for specific dispersal mechanisms are routinely assigned to flowering plants. Using the colonisation record from a volcanic island formed in 1963, we assess whether dispersal syndromes predict which species establish on newly formed land. We evaluated the long-distance dispersal (LDD) syndromes of the 78 plant species using three European classification systems. Syndrome assignments were inconsistent between classifications (coinciding for ≤ 13% of species). Two systems showed no evidence that LDD syndromes conferred a colonisation advantage. The third classification suggested wind syndromes were favoured, but only assigned a minority of colonisers to LDD syndromes. ‘Unassisted’ species assumed to lack dispersal adaptations were dominant. However, empirical evidence supports endozoochory via aquatic birds for 62 colonisers. This suggests bird-dispersal is a major driver of colonisation for dry-fruited plants, and underscores the need for new approaches to plant dispersal that account for overlooked plant–animal interactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"volume\":\"28 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70234\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70234\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70234","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于被认为是适应特定扩散机制的特征的扩散综合征通常被分配给开花植物。利用1963年形成的火山岛的殖民记录,我们评估了扩散综合征是否预测了哪些物种在新形成的陆地上建立。我们利用3种欧洲分类系统对78种植物的长距离传播(LDD)综合征进行了评价。分类之间的综合征分配不一致(≤13%的物种一致)。两个系统没有证据表明LDD综合征具有殖民优势。第三种分类表明风综合征更受青睐,但只将少数殖民者归为LDD综合征。被认为缺乏分散适应能力的“无辅助”物种占主导地位。然而,经验证据支持62个殖民者通过水鸟进行内毒素。这表明鸟类传播是干果植物定植的主要驱动力,并强调需要新的植物传播方法来解释被忽视的植物-动物相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Putative ‘Dispersal Adaptations’ Do Not Explain the Colonisation of a Volcanic Island by Vascular Plants, but Birds Can

Putative ‘Dispersal Adaptations’ Do Not Explain the Colonisation of a Volcanic Island by Vascular Plants, but Birds Can

Dispersal syndromes based on traits assumed to be adaptations for specific dispersal mechanisms are routinely assigned to flowering plants. Using the colonisation record from a volcanic island formed in 1963, we assess whether dispersal syndromes predict which species establish on newly formed land. We evaluated the long-distance dispersal (LDD) syndromes of the 78 plant species using three European classification systems. Syndrome assignments were inconsistent between classifications (coinciding for ≤ 13% of species). Two systems showed no evidence that LDD syndromes conferred a colonisation advantage. The third classification suggested wind syndromes were favoured, but only assigned a minority of colonisers to LDD syndromes. ‘Unassisted’ species assumed to lack dispersal adaptations were dominant. However, empirical evidence supports endozoochory via aquatic birds for 62 colonisers. This suggests bird-dispersal is a major driver of colonisation for dry-fruited plants, and underscores the need for new approaches to plant dispersal that account for overlooked plant–animal interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信