Keke Liu, Ran Qin, Huijuan Luo, Huining Kuang, Ranbo E, Chenyu Zhang, Bingjie Sun, Xin Guo
{"title":"利用非独眼瘫痪数据和机器学习预测儿童和青少年独眼瘫痪的球面等效折射-中国,2020-2024。","authors":"Keke Liu, Ran Qin, Huijuan Luo, Huining Kuang, Ranbo E, Chenyu Zhang, Bingjie Sun, Xin Guo","doi":"10.46234/ccdcw2025.217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cycloplegic refraction is the gold standard for assessing refractive error in children. However, logistical constraints hinder its implementation in large-scale surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data obtained from a nationwide ocular health survey conducted in ten provincial-level administrative divisions in China were analyzed (2020-2024). Participants aged 5-18 years underwent standardized non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction, axial length (AL), corneal radius (CR), and AL/CR measurements. Random forest and XGBoost models were trained to predict the cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) using non-cycloplegic SE, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and biometric parameters. Performance was evaluated using R<sup>2</sup>, root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both models exhibited strong predictive performance. In the test set, random forest achieved R<sup>2</sup>=0.88 and RMSE=0.55 diopter (D), whereas XGBoost achieved R<sup>2</sup>=0.89 and RMSE=0.54 D. Non-cycloplegic SE, AL/CR ratio, AL, and UCVA were consistently the top predictors. The predicted SE exhibited strong agreement with the cycloplegic SE, with minimal residual bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning models incorporating noncycloplegic SE and ocular biometrics accurately estimate cycloplegic SE in children and adolescents, providing a practical alternative for large-scale refractive-error surveillance when cycloplegia is impractical.</p>","PeriodicalId":69039,"journal":{"name":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","volume":"7 40","pages":"1284-1289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Cycloplegic Spherical Equivalent Refraction Among Children and Adolescents Using Non-cycloplegic Data and Machine Learning - China, 2020-2024.\",\"authors\":\"Keke Liu, Ran Qin, Huijuan Luo, Huining Kuang, Ranbo E, Chenyu Zhang, Bingjie Sun, Xin Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.46234/ccdcw2025.217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cycloplegic refraction is the gold standard for assessing refractive error in children. However, logistical constraints hinder its implementation in large-scale surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data obtained from a nationwide ocular health survey conducted in ten provincial-level administrative divisions in China were analyzed (2020-2024). Participants aged 5-18 years underwent standardized non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction, axial length (AL), corneal radius (CR), and AL/CR measurements. Random forest and XGBoost models were trained to predict the cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) using non-cycloplegic SE, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and biometric parameters. Performance was evaluated using R<sup>2</sup>, root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both models exhibited strong predictive performance. In the test set, random forest achieved R<sup>2</sup>=0.88 and RMSE=0.55 diopter (D), whereas XGBoost achieved R<sup>2</sup>=0.89 and RMSE=0.54 D. Non-cycloplegic SE, AL/CR ratio, AL, and UCVA were consistently the top predictors. The predicted SE exhibited strong agreement with the cycloplegic SE, with minimal residual bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning models incorporating noncycloplegic SE and ocular biometrics accurately estimate cycloplegic SE in children and adolescents, providing a practical alternative for large-scale refractive-error surveillance when cycloplegia is impractical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":69039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国疾病预防控制中心周报\",\"volume\":\"7 40\",\"pages\":\"1284-1289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518965/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国疾病预防控制中心周报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2025.217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2025.217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting Cycloplegic Spherical Equivalent Refraction Among Children and Adolescents Using Non-cycloplegic Data and Machine Learning - China, 2020-2024.
Introduction: Cycloplegic refraction is the gold standard for assessing refractive error in children. However, logistical constraints hinder its implementation in large-scale surveys.
Methods: Data obtained from a nationwide ocular health survey conducted in ten provincial-level administrative divisions in China were analyzed (2020-2024). Participants aged 5-18 years underwent standardized non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction, axial length (AL), corneal radius (CR), and AL/CR measurements. Random forest and XGBoost models were trained to predict the cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) using non-cycloplegic SE, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and biometric parameters. Performance was evaluated using R2, root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results: Both models exhibited strong predictive performance. In the test set, random forest achieved R2=0.88 and RMSE=0.55 diopter (D), whereas XGBoost achieved R2=0.89 and RMSE=0.54 D. Non-cycloplegic SE, AL/CR ratio, AL, and UCVA were consistently the top predictors. The predicted SE exhibited strong agreement with the cycloplegic SE, with minimal residual bias.
Conclusion: Machine learning models incorporating noncycloplegic SE and ocular biometrics accurately estimate cycloplegic SE in children and adolescents, providing a practical alternative for large-scale refractive-error surveillance when cycloplegia is impractical.