{"title":"摩洛哥icu的临终关怀:伦理挑战,实践和强化医生的观点。","authors":"Younes Aissaoui, Fadwa Charif, Bassam Bencharfa, Ayoub Bouchama, Ismail Myatt, Ayoub Belhadj","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01271-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>End-of-life (EOL) care practices, particularly the withholding and withdrawing (W/W) of life-sustaining treatments (LSTs), remain underexplored in North Africa. This study examined factors that influence EOL practices in Morocco.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide online survey was conducted over one month (from July to August 2023) among Moroccan intensivists, assessing their perspectives on W/W LSTs, decision-making processes, and influencing factors, including ethical, cultural, and religious considerations. Univariable analyses were performed to screen for potential associations, followed by multivariable logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with W/W decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 351 invited intensivists, 151 completed the survey, yielding a 41% response rate. The mean age of respondents was 47 ± 9 years, and 84% were male. Most interpreted EOL care as providing palliative care (74%) or ensuring a dignified death (59%), while only 23% explicitly associated it with the cessation of life-sustaining treatment. Nearly 40% reported never having made withholding or withdrawing (W/W) decisions, and 88% made fewer than one such decision per week. While 59% considered withholding LSTs ethically acceptable, only 5% supported both withholding and withdrawing. The most frequently cited barriers were the absence of a legal framework (75%), sociocultural constraints (44%), and discomfort discussing EOL issues with families (58%). Patient wishes were considered in fewer than half of cases, whereas family preferences predominated in 66%. Documentation of W/W decisions was uncommon (27%), and formal institutional protocols were largely absent (94.5%). In multivariable analysis, practicing in a public hospital (odds ratio [OR] = 3.16, p = 0.005) and believing that Islam permits W/W decisions (OR = 3.49, p = 0.006) were independently associated with a higher likelihood of making such decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moroccan intensivists face major ethical and practical challenges in EOL care, including legal ambiguity, lack of protocols, limited patient involvement, and difficulty communicating with families. The findings highlight the urgent need for legislative reforms, standardized protocols, and improved education to support ethical, culturally sensitive, and patient-centred EOL practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"135"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"End-of-life care in Moroccan ICUs: ethical challenges, practices, and perspectives of intensivists.\",\"authors\":\"Younes Aissaoui, Fadwa Charif, Bassam Bencharfa, Ayoub Bouchama, Ismail Myatt, Ayoub Belhadj\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12910-025-01271-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>End-of-life (EOL) care practices, particularly the withholding and withdrawing (W/W) of life-sustaining treatments (LSTs), remain underexplored in North Africa. This study examined factors that influence EOL practices in Morocco.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide online survey was conducted over one month (from July to August 2023) among Moroccan intensivists, assessing their perspectives on W/W LSTs, decision-making processes, and influencing factors, including ethical, cultural, and religious considerations. Univariable analyses were performed to screen for potential associations, followed by multivariable logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with W/W decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 351 invited intensivists, 151 completed the survey, yielding a 41% response rate. The mean age of respondents was 47 ± 9 years, and 84% were male. Most interpreted EOL care as providing palliative care (74%) or ensuring a dignified death (59%), while only 23% explicitly associated it with the cessation of life-sustaining treatment. Nearly 40% reported never having made withholding or withdrawing (W/W) decisions, and 88% made fewer than one such decision per week. While 59% considered withholding LSTs ethically acceptable, only 5% supported both withholding and withdrawing. The most frequently cited barriers were the absence of a legal framework (75%), sociocultural constraints (44%), and discomfort discussing EOL issues with families (58%). Patient wishes were considered in fewer than half of cases, whereas family preferences predominated in 66%. Documentation of W/W decisions was uncommon (27%), and formal institutional protocols were largely absent (94.5%). In multivariable analysis, practicing in a public hospital (odds ratio [OR] = 3.16, p = 0.005) and believing that Islam permits W/W decisions (OR = 3.49, p = 0.006) were independently associated with a higher likelihood of making such decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moroccan intensivists face major ethical and practical challenges in EOL care, including legal ambiguity, lack of protocols, limited patient involvement, and difficulty communicating with families. The findings highlight the urgent need for legislative reforms, standardized protocols, and improved education to support ethical, culturally sensitive, and patient-centred EOL practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522822/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01271-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01271-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:生命末期(EOL)护理实践,特别是生命维持治疗(lst)的保留和退出(W/W),在北非仍未得到充分探索。本研究考察了影响摩洛哥EOL实践的因素。方法:在一个多月(2023年7月至8月)的时间里,在摩洛哥密集主义者中进行了一项全国性的在线调查,评估他们对W/W LSTs、决策过程和影响因素(包括伦理、文化和宗教考虑)的看法。进行单变量分析以筛选潜在的关联,然后进行多变量逻辑回归以确定与W/W决策独立相关的因素。结果:351名特邀住院医师中,151人完成问卷调查,回复率41%。受访者平均年龄为47±9岁,男性占84%。大多数人将临终关怀解释为提供姑息治疗(74%)或确保有尊严的死亡(59%),而只有23%的人明确将其与停止维持生命的治疗联系起来。近40%的人从未做过扣款或提款(W/W)的决定,88%的人每周做的这样的决定少于一次。虽然59%的人认为扣留lst在道德上是可以接受的,但只有5%的人支持扣留和撤回lst。最常见的障碍是缺乏法律框架(75%),社会文化限制(44%),以及与家人讨论离职问题时感到不舒服(58%)。只有不到一半的病例会考虑病人的意愿,而66%的病例会考虑家属的意愿。W/W决定的文件很少(27%),正式的机构协议基本缺失(94.5%)。在多变量分析中,在公立医院执业(比值比[OR] = 3.16, p = 0.005)和相信伊斯兰教允许W/W决策(OR = 3.49, p = 0.006)与做出此类决策的可能性较高独立相关。结论:摩洛哥重症医师在EOL护理中面临着重大的伦理和实践挑战,包括法律模糊、缺乏协议、患者参与有限以及与家属沟通困难。研究结果强调,迫切需要进行立法改革、标准化方案和改进教育,以支持道德、文化敏感和以患者为中心的EOL实践。
End-of-life care in Moroccan ICUs: ethical challenges, practices, and perspectives of intensivists.
Background: End-of-life (EOL) care practices, particularly the withholding and withdrawing (W/W) of life-sustaining treatments (LSTs), remain underexplored in North Africa. This study examined factors that influence EOL practices in Morocco.
Methods: A nationwide online survey was conducted over one month (from July to August 2023) among Moroccan intensivists, assessing their perspectives on W/W LSTs, decision-making processes, and influencing factors, including ethical, cultural, and religious considerations. Univariable analyses were performed to screen for potential associations, followed by multivariable logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with W/W decisions.
Results: Of 351 invited intensivists, 151 completed the survey, yielding a 41% response rate. The mean age of respondents was 47 ± 9 years, and 84% were male. Most interpreted EOL care as providing palliative care (74%) or ensuring a dignified death (59%), while only 23% explicitly associated it with the cessation of life-sustaining treatment. Nearly 40% reported never having made withholding or withdrawing (W/W) decisions, and 88% made fewer than one such decision per week. While 59% considered withholding LSTs ethically acceptable, only 5% supported both withholding and withdrawing. The most frequently cited barriers were the absence of a legal framework (75%), sociocultural constraints (44%), and discomfort discussing EOL issues with families (58%). Patient wishes were considered in fewer than half of cases, whereas family preferences predominated in 66%. Documentation of W/W decisions was uncommon (27%), and formal institutional protocols were largely absent (94.5%). In multivariable analysis, practicing in a public hospital (odds ratio [OR] = 3.16, p = 0.005) and believing that Islam permits W/W decisions (OR = 3.49, p = 0.006) were independently associated with a higher likelihood of making such decisions.
Conclusion: Moroccan intensivists face major ethical and practical challenges in EOL care, including legal ambiguity, lack of protocols, limited patient involvement, and difficulty communicating with families. The findings highlight the urgent need for legislative reforms, standardized protocols, and improved education to support ethical, culturally sensitive, and patient-centred EOL practices.
期刊介绍:
BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.