两车碰撞事故损伤严重程度的原因分析:来自相关随机参数方法的洞察。

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hua Liu, Yongfeng Ma, Tiezhu Li
{"title":"两车碰撞事故损伤严重程度的原因分析:来自相关随机参数方法的洞察。","authors":"Hua Liu, Yongfeng Ma, Tiezhu Li","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2561765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Two-vehicle collision crashes are always tough challenges for traffic management departments due to its severe consequences. This study aims to investigate risk mechanism of three types of two-vehicle collisions (i.e., head on, sideswipe, and rear end) in the same city from a comprehensive perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random parameters binary logit framework was employed to capture the unobserved heterogeneity across individual observations and reveal potential correlations between risk indicators of injury severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that the correlated random parameters model performs best, and the impacts of risk indicators involving unsafe driving behavior and driver, vehicle, roadway, environment, and temporal characteristics on two-vehicle collisions are quite different. Based on the determinants of each two-vehicle collision, some recommendations have been proposed to improve the level of road traffic safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fatal collisions are more likely to happen when driving on the roads with higher road function classification and involving the presence of heavy trucks. Road type, weather condition, and unsafe driving behavior are primary contributors to two-vehicle collisions. Besides, fatal head-on collisions are prone to occurring when exceeding speed limits and driving on rainy days. Illegal overtaking or lane changing significantly increases the risk of fatal injuries in both sideswipe and rear-end collisions. Moreover, significant correlations between the on-ramp of highways and violating traffic lights or signs, and between cloudy days and visibility range within 50-100 m, are identified in the injury severity models of sideswipe and rear-end collisions, respectively. Current findings suggest that more attention should be devoted to intervening unsafe driving behaviors for sideswipe collisions, as well as enhancing the provision of visibility range information to mitigate rear-end collisions in adverse weather conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal analysis of injury severity of two-vehicle collision crashes: Insight from a correlated random parameters approach.\",\"authors\":\"Hua Liu, Yongfeng Ma, Tiezhu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2025.2561765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Two-vehicle collision crashes are always tough challenges for traffic management departments due to its severe consequences. This study aims to investigate risk mechanism of three types of two-vehicle collisions (i.e., head on, sideswipe, and rear end) in the same city from a comprehensive perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random parameters binary logit framework was employed to capture the unobserved heterogeneity across individual observations and reveal potential correlations between risk indicators of injury severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that the correlated random parameters model performs best, and the impacts of risk indicators involving unsafe driving behavior and driver, vehicle, roadway, environment, and temporal characteristics on two-vehicle collisions are quite different. Based on the determinants of each two-vehicle collision, some recommendations have been proposed to improve the level of road traffic safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fatal collisions are more likely to happen when driving on the roads with higher road function classification and involving the presence of heavy trucks. Road type, weather condition, and unsafe driving behavior are primary contributors to two-vehicle collisions. Besides, fatal head-on collisions are prone to occurring when exceeding speed limits and driving on rainy days. Illegal overtaking or lane changing significantly increases the risk of fatal injuries in both sideswipe and rear-end collisions. Moreover, significant correlations between the on-ramp of highways and violating traffic lights or signs, and between cloudy days and visibility range within 50-100 m, are identified in the injury severity models of sideswipe and rear-end collisions, respectively. Current findings suggest that more attention should be devoted to intervening unsafe driving behaviors for sideswipe collisions, as well as enhancing the provision of visibility range information to mitigate rear-end collisions in adverse weather conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2561765\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2561765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:双车碰撞事故后果严重,一直是交通管理部门面临的严峻挑战。本研究旨在从综合角度研究同一城市三种类型的双车碰撞(即迎头、侧击和追尾)的风险机制。方法:采用随机参数二元logit框架来捕捉个体观察中未观察到的异质性,并揭示损伤严重程度风险指标之间的潜在相关性。结果:相关随机参数模型表现最好,不安全驾驶行为和驾驶员、车辆、道路、环境、时间特征等风险指标对两车碰撞的影响差异较大。根据每次两车碰撞的决定因素,提出了一些建议,以提高道路交通安全水平。结论:在道路功能等级较高、重型卡车存在的道路上行驶更容易发生致命碰撞。道路类型、天气状况和不安全驾驶行为是造成两车碰撞的主要原因。此外,在雨天超速行驶和驾驶时,容易发生致命的正面碰撞。非法超车或变道大大增加了侧击和追尾事故中致命伤害的风险。此外,在侧擦和追尾碰撞伤害严重程度模型中,分别发现高速公路入口匝道与违反红绿灯或标志、阴天与50-100 m范围内能见度之间存在显著相关性。目前的研究结果表明,应该更多地关注干预侧擦碰撞的不安全驾驶行为,以及加强视野范围信息的提供,以减轻恶劣天气条件下的追尾碰撞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal analysis of injury severity of two-vehicle collision crashes: Insight from a correlated random parameters approach.

Objective: Two-vehicle collision crashes are always tough challenges for traffic management departments due to its severe consequences. This study aims to investigate risk mechanism of three types of two-vehicle collisions (i.e., head on, sideswipe, and rear end) in the same city from a comprehensive perspective.

Methods: A random parameters binary logit framework was employed to capture the unobserved heterogeneity across individual observations and reveal potential correlations between risk indicators of injury severity.

Results: The results indicate that the correlated random parameters model performs best, and the impacts of risk indicators involving unsafe driving behavior and driver, vehicle, roadway, environment, and temporal characteristics on two-vehicle collisions are quite different. Based on the determinants of each two-vehicle collision, some recommendations have been proposed to improve the level of road traffic safety.

Conclusions: Fatal collisions are more likely to happen when driving on the roads with higher road function classification and involving the presence of heavy trucks. Road type, weather condition, and unsafe driving behavior are primary contributors to two-vehicle collisions. Besides, fatal head-on collisions are prone to occurring when exceeding speed limits and driving on rainy days. Illegal overtaking or lane changing significantly increases the risk of fatal injuries in both sideswipe and rear-end collisions. Moreover, significant correlations between the on-ramp of highways and violating traffic lights or signs, and between cloudy days and visibility range within 50-100 m, are identified in the injury severity models of sideswipe and rear-end collisions, respectively. Current findings suggest that more attention should be devoted to intervening unsafe driving behaviors for sideswipe collisions, as well as enhancing the provision of visibility range information to mitigate rear-end collisions in adverse weather conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信