Filip Winzell, Ida Arvidsson, Kalle Åström, Niels Christian Overgaard, Felicia-Elena Marginean, Athanasios Simoulis, Anders Bjartell, Agnieszka Krzyzanowska, Anders Heyden
{"title":"多实例学习用于前列腺癌患者主动监测的纵向预后预测。","authors":"Filip Winzell, Ida Arvidsson, Kalle Åström, Niels Christian Overgaard, Felicia-Elena Marginean, Athanasios Simoulis, Anders Bjartell, Agnieszka Krzyzanowska, Anders Heyden","doi":"10.1117/1.JMI.12.6.061408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To avoid over-treatment of prostate cancer patients following screening for elevated prostate-specific antigen levels, keeping patients on active surveillance has been suggested as an alternative to radical treatment. This means recurring visits for patients with low-grade cancer to monitor progression. Our aim was to develop an artificial intelligence-based model that can identify high-risk patients in a cohort of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We have developed a multiple instance learning-based framework for predicting the longitudinal outcomes for prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. Our models were trained only on whole-slide images with patient-level labels without using explicit Gleason grades. We employed the UNI-2 foundation model and the well-established attention-based multiple instance learning approach. We further evaluated our models by fitting Cox proportional hazards models and testing them on an external dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With this approach, we achieved an average area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.958 (95% CI, 0.957 to 0.959). Fitting Cox models to the predicted probabilities achieved a <math><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow> </math> -index of 0.824 and a hazard ratio of 2.32. However, all models showed a large drop in performance when evaluated on an external dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We show that avoiding Gleason grades is beneficial for longitudinal outcome prediction of prostate cancer. Our results suggest that benign prostate tissue contains prognostic information. However, before our models could be used clinically, much more work remains to improve the generalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":47707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging","volume":"12 6","pages":"061408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal outcome prediction of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance using multiple instance learning.\",\"authors\":\"Filip Winzell, Ida Arvidsson, Kalle Åström, Niels Christian Overgaard, Felicia-Elena Marginean, Athanasios Simoulis, Anders Bjartell, Agnieszka Krzyzanowska, Anders Heyden\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.JMI.12.6.061408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To avoid over-treatment of prostate cancer patients following screening for elevated prostate-specific antigen levels, keeping patients on active surveillance has been suggested as an alternative to radical treatment. This means recurring visits for patients with low-grade cancer to monitor progression. Our aim was to develop an artificial intelligence-based model that can identify high-risk patients in a cohort of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We have developed a multiple instance learning-based framework for predicting the longitudinal outcomes for prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. Our models were trained only on whole-slide images with patient-level labels without using explicit Gleason grades. We employed the UNI-2 foundation model and the well-established attention-based multiple instance learning approach. We further evaluated our models by fitting Cox proportional hazards models and testing them on an external dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With this approach, we achieved an average area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.958 (95% CI, 0.957 to 0.959). Fitting Cox models to the predicted probabilities achieved a <math><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow> </math> -index of 0.824 and a hazard ratio of 2.32. However, all models showed a large drop in performance when evaluated on an external dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We show that avoiding Gleason grades is beneficial for longitudinal outcome prediction of prostate cancer. Our results suggest that benign prostate tissue contains prognostic information. However, before our models could be used clinically, much more work remains to improve the generalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"061408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518054/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.12.6.061408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.12.6.061408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Longitudinal outcome prediction of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance using multiple instance learning.
Purpose: To avoid over-treatment of prostate cancer patients following screening for elevated prostate-specific antigen levels, keeping patients on active surveillance has been suggested as an alternative to radical treatment. This means recurring visits for patients with low-grade cancer to monitor progression. Our aim was to develop an artificial intelligence-based model that can identify high-risk patients in a cohort of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.
Approach: We have developed a multiple instance learning-based framework for predicting the longitudinal outcomes for prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. Our models were trained only on whole-slide images with patient-level labels without using explicit Gleason grades. We employed the UNI-2 foundation model and the well-established attention-based multiple instance learning approach. We further evaluated our models by fitting Cox proportional hazards models and testing them on an external dataset.
Results: With this approach, we achieved an average area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.958 (95% CI, 0.957 to 0.959). Fitting Cox models to the predicted probabilities achieved a -index of 0.824 and a hazard ratio of 2.32. However, all models showed a large drop in performance when evaluated on an external dataset.
Conclusion: We show that avoiding Gleason grades is beneficial for longitudinal outcome prediction of prostate cancer. Our results suggest that benign prostate tissue contains prognostic information. However, before our models could be used clinically, much more work remains to improve the generalization.
期刊介绍:
JMI covers fundamental and translational research, as well as applications, focused on medical imaging, which continue to yield physical and biomedical advancements in the early detection, diagnostics, and therapy of disease as well as in the understanding of normal. The scope of JMI includes: Imaging physics, Tomographic reconstruction algorithms (such as those in CT and MRI), Image processing and deep learning, Computer-aided diagnosis and quantitative image analysis, Visualization and modeling, Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS), Image perception and observer performance, Technology assessment, Ultrasonic imaging, Image-guided procedures, Digital pathology, Biomedical applications of biomedical imaging. JMI allows for the peer-reviewed communication and archiving of scientific developments, translational and clinical applications, reviews, and recommendations for the field.