评估跟后前螺钉固定在踝关节创伤后胫距跟骨钉中的作用:回顾性比较研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Karissa Badillo, Jeffrey Manway, Gele Moloney
{"title":"评估跟后前螺钉固定在踝关节创伤后胫距跟骨钉中的作用:回顾性比较研究。","authors":"Karissa Badillo, Jeffrey Manway, Gele Moloney","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing is commonly used to treat severe ankle trauma, especially in patients with poor bone quality or compromised soft tissue. Although biomechanical studies suggest that posterior-to-anterior (P-A) screws enhance stability, the clinical impact of these screws remains uncertain. This study aims to compare complication rates between patients who underwent TTC nailing with and without P-A screws after ankle trauma. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 33 patients who underwent TTC nailing for ankle trauma between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received P-A screws (n = 13) and those who did not (n = 20). Demographic and surgical variables, including age, comorbidities, and operative factors, were analyzed. Complication rates were compared using nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests. Significance was set at p < 0.05. The mean age of patients was 70.5 years, with 63.6% female and 36.4% diabetic. The overall major complication rate was 15.1%, with no statistically significant difference between the P-A screw group and the non-P-A screw group (p = 1.00). Other factors, including age (p = 0.24), time to weightbearing (p = 1.00), and the presence of comorbidities such as diabetes or peripheral arterial disease, did not significantly impact complication rate. Our study found no significant difference in complication rates between patients who received P-A screws during TTC nailing and those who did not. Despite biomechanical studies supporting P-A screws for increased stability, this did not translate to improved clinical outcomes. Further prospective research is warranted to evaluate the clinical relevance of P-A screws in TTC nailing for ankle trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Role of Posterior to Anterior Calcaneal Screw Fixation in Tibiotalocalcaneal Nailing After Ankle Trauma: A Retrospective Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Karissa Badillo, Jeffrey Manway, Gele Moloney\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing is commonly used to treat severe ankle trauma, especially in patients with poor bone quality or compromised soft tissue. Although biomechanical studies suggest that posterior-to-anterior (P-A) screws enhance stability, the clinical impact of these screws remains uncertain. This study aims to compare complication rates between patients who underwent TTC nailing with and without P-A screws after ankle trauma. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 33 patients who underwent TTC nailing for ankle trauma between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received P-A screws (n = 13) and those who did not (n = 20). Demographic and surgical variables, including age, comorbidities, and operative factors, were analyzed. Complication rates were compared using nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests. Significance was set at p < 0.05. The mean age of patients was 70.5 years, with 63.6% female and 36.4% diabetic. The overall major complication rate was 15.1%, with no statistically significant difference between the P-A screw group and the non-P-A screw group (p = 1.00). Other factors, including age (p = 0.24), time to weightbearing (p = 1.00), and the presence of comorbidities such as diabetes or peripheral arterial disease, did not significantly impact complication rate. Our study found no significant difference in complication rates between patients who received P-A screws during TTC nailing and those who did not. Despite biomechanical studies supporting P-A screws for increased stability, this did not translate to improved clinical outcomes. Further prospective research is warranted to evaluate the clinical relevance of P-A screws in TTC nailing for ankle trauma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.10.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.10.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胫距跟骨钉(TTC)通常用于治疗严重的踝关节创伤,特别是骨质量差或软组织受损的患者。尽管生物力学研究表明后路-前路(P-A)螺钉可增强稳定性,但这些螺钉的临床效果仍不确定。本研究旨在比较踝关节创伤后行TTC内钉与不行P-A螺钉的患者的并发症发生率。回顾性分析2016年至2022年间33例踝关节创伤行TTC内钉治疗的患者。患者分为两组:接受P-A螺钉治疗组(n = 13)和未接受P-A螺钉治疗组(n = 20)。分析人口统计学和外科变量,包括年龄、合并症和手术因素。采用非参数Wilcoxon秩和和Fisher精确检验比较并发症发生率。p < 0.05为显著性。患者平均年龄70.5岁,女性占63.6%,糖尿病患者占36.4%。总主要并发症发生率为15.1%,p - a螺钉组与非p - a螺钉组比较差异无统计学意义(p = 1.00)。其他因素,包括年龄(p = 0.24)、负重时间(p = 1.00)和合并症(如糖尿病或外周动脉疾病)的存在,对并发症发生率没有显著影响。我们的研究发现,在TTC内钉中使用P-A螺钉与未使用P-A螺钉的患者之间并发症发生率无显著差异。尽管生物力学研究支持P-A螺钉增加稳定性,但这并没有转化为改善临床结果。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来评估P-A螺钉在踝关节创伤TTC内钉治疗中的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Role of Posterior to Anterior Calcaneal Screw Fixation in Tibiotalocalcaneal Nailing After Ankle Trauma: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing is commonly used to treat severe ankle trauma, especially in patients with poor bone quality or compromised soft tissue. Although biomechanical studies suggest that posterior-to-anterior (P-A) screws enhance stability, the clinical impact of these screws remains uncertain. This study aims to compare complication rates between patients who underwent TTC nailing with and without P-A screws after ankle trauma. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 33 patients who underwent TTC nailing for ankle trauma between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received P-A screws (n = 13) and those who did not (n = 20). Demographic and surgical variables, including age, comorbidities, and operative factors, were analyzed. Complication rates were compared using nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests. Significance was set at p < 0.05. The mean age of patients was 70.5 years, with 63.6% female and 36.4% diabetic. The overall major complication rate was 15.1%, with no statistically significant difference between the P-A screw group and the non-P-A screw group (p = 1.00). Other factors, including age (p = 0.24), time to weightbearing (p = 1.00), and the presence of comorbidities such as diabetes or peripheral arterial disease, did not significantly impact complication rate. Our study found no significant difference in complication rates between patients who received P-A screws during TTC nailing and those who did not. Despite biomechanical studies supporting P-A screws for increased stability, this did not translate to improved clinical outcomes. Further prospective research is warranted to evaluate the clinical relevance of P-A screws in TTC nailing for ankle trauma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信