巴西一家公立癌症医院结构化机器人手术培训项目的前瞻性研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Ricardo Zugaib Abdalla, William Carlos Nahas, Ivan Cecconello, Ulysses Ribeiro
{"title":"巴西一家公立癌症医院结构化机器人手术培训项目的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Ricardo Zugaib Abdalla, William Carlos Nahas, Ivan Cecconello, Ulysses Ribeiro","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02881-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implementation of robotic surgery represents a major advance for oncological surgical care, particularly in public health systems, but requires robust training and proctorship for established surgeons. To assess surgeon performance and clinical outcomes following a structured, proctored training program for robotic surgery in a Brazilian public cancer hospital. This prospective, randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02292914, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02292914 ) recruited 564 cancer patients (2014-2020) for either robotic (n = 326) or control (laparoscopic/open, n = 238) procedures. Sixteen surgeons (> 10 years oncology experience) underwent a standardized four-stage laboratory and perioperative proctored curriculum. Outcomes included operative duration, blood loss, lymph node yield, and intraoperative complications. Data were analyzed in IBM-SPSS v20.0 (chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, paired t-test, GEE; p < 0.05). All surgeons completed the laboratory curriculum; eight met full operative certification criteria. Robotic procedures took longer than controls (mean 304.9 vs 259.1 min; p < 0.001), with significantly less blood loss (mean 266.2 vs 598.2 mL; p < 0.001). Lymph node yields and complication rates did not differ. Operative durations decreased with experience. Structured, proctored training enabled safe transition to robotic surgery in this high-volume public cancer center. The model is scalable and adaptable to other institutions and innovations in public hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"695"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective study of a structured robotic surgery training program in a public cancer hospital in Brazil.\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Zugaib Abdalla, William Carlos Nahas, Ivan Cecconello, Ulysses Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11701-025-02881-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The implementation of robotic surgery represents a major advance for oncological surgical care, particularly in public health systems, but requires robust training and proctorship for established surgeons. To assess surgeon performance and clinical outcomes following a structured, proctored training program for robotic surgery in a Brazilian public cancer hospital. This prospective, randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02292914, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02292914 ) recruited 564 cancer patients (2014-2020) for either robotic (n = 326) or control (laparoscopic/open, n = 238) procedures. Sixteen surgeons (> 10 years oncology experience) underwent a standardized four-stage laboratory and perioperative proctored curriculum. Outcomes included operative duration, blood loss, lymph node yield, and intraoperative complications. Data were analyzed in IBM-SPSS v20.0 (chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, paired t-test, GEE; p < 0.05). All surgeons completed the laboratory curriculum; eight met full operative certification criteria. Robotic procedures took longer than controls (mean 304.9 vs 259.1 min; p < 0.001), with significantly less blood loss (mean 266.2 vs 598.2 mL; p < 0.001). Lymph node yields and complication rates did not differ. Operative durations decreased with experience. Structured, proctored training enabled safe transition to robotic surgery in this high-volume public cancer center. The model is scalable and adaptable to other institutions and innovations in public hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02881-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02881-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人手术的实施代表了肿瘤外科护理的重大进步,特别是在公共卫生系统中,但需要对成熟的外科医生进行强有力的培训和监督。在巴西一家公立癌症医院,对机器人手术进行结构化、有监督的培训项目后,评估外科医生的表现和临床结果。这项前瞻性随机试验(ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02292914, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02292914)招募了564名癌症患者(2014-2020年),进行机器人(n = 326)或对照组(n = 238)手术。16名外科医生(10年肿瘤学经验)接受了标准化的四阶段实验室和围手术期监护课程。结果包括手术时间、出血量、淋巴结产量和术中并发症。数据采用IBM-SPSS v20.0进行分析(χ 2, Fisher’s exact, Mann-Whitney,配对t检验,GEE
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective study of a structured robotic surgery training program in a public cancer hospital in Brazil.

The implementation of robotic surgery represents a major advance for oncological surgical care, particularly in public health systems, but requires robust training and proctorship for established surgeons. To assess surgeon performance and clinical outcomes following a structured, proctored training program for robotic surgery in a Brazilian public cancer hospital. This prospective, randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02292914, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02292914 ) recruited 564 cancer patients (2014-2020) for either robotic (n = 326) or control (laparoscopic/open, n = 238) procedures. Sixteen surgeons (> 10 years oncology experience) underwent a standardized four-stage laboratory and perioperative proctored curriculum. Outcomes included operative duration, blood loss, lymph node yield, and intraoperative complications. Data were analyzed in IBM-SPSS v20.0 (chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, paired t-test, GEE; p < 0.05). All surgeons completed the laboratory curriculum; eight met full operative certification criteria. Robotic procedures took longer than controls (mean 304.9 vs 259.1 min; p < 0.001), with significantly less blood loss (mean 266.2 vs 598.2 mL; p < 0.001). Lymph node yields and complication rates did not differ. Operative durations decreased with experience. Structured, proctored training enabled safe transition to robotic surgery in this high-volume public cancer center. The model is scalable and adaptable to other institutions and innovations in public hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信