Neil Sheth, John M Bryan, Reem Alahmadi, Michael J Heiferman
{"title":"2013-2021年视网膜成像使用与抗血管内皮生长因子和全视网膜光凝使用的相关性","authors":"Neil Sheth, John M Bryan, Reem Alahmadi, Michael J Heiferman","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze trends in retinal imaging utilization and assess whether there is a correlation with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) usage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional study utilizing the publicly available Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners - by Provider and Service database. Data were identified using procedural codes for ocular coherence tomography (OCT), fundus photography (FP), fluorescein angiography (FA), ICGA (indocyanine green angiography), ophthalmic ultrasound (US), intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, and PRP from 2013-2021. Time-based analyses were also conducted for the individual periods 2013-2016 and 2017-2021 in order to account for changes in the billing of FA from unilateral to unilateral or bilateral after 2016.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While OCT increased in relative utilization (p < 0.001 across 2013-2021, 2013-2016, and 2017-2021), there was a decline in relative utilization for FA, FA+ICGA, US, and FP (p < 0.001 for all modalities across 2013-2021, 2013-2016, and 2017-2021). For PRP, positive associations in annual volume were observed with FA (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.81) and FA+ICGA (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.87), while a negative association in annual volume was observed with OCT (p = 0.028, R2 = 0.52). For anti-VEGF injections, a positive association in annual volume was observed with OCT (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.84), while negative associations were observed with FA (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.89) and FA+ICGA (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.90). Although anti-VEGF use returned to 2019 levels by 2021, PRP use declined by 30% during the same time period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OCT continues to rise as a percentage of all retinal imaging ordered, while FA has declined. This trend corresponds to an increase in anti-VEGF injections and a decline in PRP in the treatment of retinal diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation of Retinal Imaging Utilization with Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Panretinal Photocoagulation Usage from 2013-2021.\",\"authors\":\"Neil Sheth, John M Bryan, Reem Alahmadi, Michael J Heiferman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze trends in retinal imaging utilization and assess whether there is a correlation with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) usage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional study utilizing the publicly available Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners - by Provider and Service database. Data were identified using procedural codes for ocular coherence tomography (OCT), fundus photography (FP), fluorescein angiography (FA), ICGA (indocyanine green angiography), ophthalmic ultrasound (US), intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, and PRP from 2013-2021. Time-based analyses were also conducted for the individual periods 2013-2016 and 2017-2021 in order to account for changes in the billing of FA from unilateral to unilateral or bilateral after 2016.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While OCT increased in relative utilization (p < 0.001 across 2013-2021, 2013-2016, and 2017-2021), there was a decline in relative utilization for FA, FA+ICGA, US, and FP (p < 0.001 for all modalities across 2013-2021, 2013-2016, and 2017-2021). For PRP, positive associations in annual volume were observed with FA (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.81) and FA+ICGA (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.87), while a negative association in annual volume was observed with OCT (p = 0.028, R2 = 0.52). For anti-VEGF injections, a positive association in annual volume was observed with OCT (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.84), while negative associations were observed with FA (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.89) and FA+ICGA (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.90). Although anti-VEGF use returned to 2019 levels by 2021, PRP use declined by 30% during the same time period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OCT continues to rise as a percentage of all retinal imaging ordered, while FA has declined. This trend corresponds to an increase in anti-VEGF injections and a decline in PRP in the treatment of retinal diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004703\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004703","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correlation of Retinal Imaging Utilization with Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Panretinal Photocoagulation Usage from 2013-2021.
Purpose: To analyze trends in retinal imaging utilization and assess whether there is a correlation with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) usage.
Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study utilizing the publicly available Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners - by Provider and Service database. Data were identified using procedural codes for ocular coherence tomography (OCT), fundus photography (FP), fluorescein angiography (FA), ICGA (indocyanine green angiography), ophthalmic ultrasound (US), intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, and PRP from 2013-2021. Time-based analyses were also conducted for the individual periods 2013-2016 and 2017-2021 in order to account for changes in the billing of FA from unilateral to unilateral or bilateral after 2016.
Results: While OCT increased in relative utilization (p < 0.001 across 2013-2021, 2013-2016, and 2017-2021), there was a decline in relative utilization for FA, FA+ICGA, US, and FP (p < 0.001 for all modalities across 2013-2021, 2013-2016, and 2017-2021). For PRP, positive associations in annual volume were observed with FA (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.81) and FA+ICGA (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.87), while a negative association in annual volume was observed with OCT (p = 0.028, R2 = 0.52). For anti-VEGF injections, a positive association in annual volume was observed with OCT (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.84), while negative associations were observed with FA (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.89) and FA+ICGA (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.90). Although anti-VEGF use returned to 2019 levels by 2021, PRP use declined by 30% during the same time period.
Conclusion: OCT continues to rise as a percentage of all retinal imaging ordered, while FA has declined. This trend corresponds to an increase in anti-VEGF injections and a decline in PRP in the treatment of retinal diseases.
期刊介绍:
RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice.
In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color.
Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.