超越原因:揭示青少年认知情绪调节策略与内化问题的双向关系

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Jianjun Huang, Yueqin Hui, Yuxin Xie, Yuan Feng, Wenxin Xu, Jin-Liang Wang
{"title":"超越原因:揭示青少年认知情绪调节策略与内化问题的双向关系","authors":"Jianjun Huang, Yueqin Hui, Yuxin Xie, Yuan Feng, Wenxin Xu, Jin-Liang Wang","doi":"10.1002/jad.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies (MCERSs) have been generally conceptualized as causes of adolescent internalizing problems. This conceptualization was dominant in both theoretical frameworks and practical applications. However, it may not fully capture the complex relationships between MCERSs and internalizing problems. In this study, we challenge this assumption and propose an alternative perspective: MCERSs are not just causes of internalizing problems but also emerge as outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a two-wave longitudinal survey (N = 892; 487 girls, 405 boys; M<sub>T1 age</sub> = 13.88 years, SD<sub>T1 age</sub> = 1.41 years) with a 1.5-year interval to examine the bidirectional relationships between four types of MCERSs (i.e., self-blame, rumination, catastrophizing, and blaming others) and two internalizing problems (i.e., anxiety and depression). Cross-lagged panel network analysis was used to test our hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The associations between T1 MCERSs and T2 internalizing problems were relatively weak, whereas T1 internalizing problems were strongly related to T2 MCERSs. Moreover, internalizing problems demonstrated a higher out-expected influence, suggesting that they act as catalysts in the network.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings reveal the complex interplays between MCERSs and internalizing problems, underscoring that MCERSs may not be universally harmful and may be reciprocally influenced by adolescents' emotional states.</p>","PeriodicalId":48397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Than Causes: Unveiling Bidirectional Relationships Between Maladaptive Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Internalizing Problems in Adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Jianjun Huang, Yueqin Hui, Yuxin Xie, Yuan Feng, Wenxin Xu, Jin-Liang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jad.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies (MCERSs) have been generally conceptualized as causes of adolescent internalizing problems. This conceptualization was dominant in both theoretical frameworks and practical applications. However, it may not fully capture the complex relationships between MCERSs and internalizing problems. In this study, we challenge this assumption and propose an alternative perspective: MCERSs are not just causes of internalizing problems but also emerge as outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a two-wave longitudinal survey (N = 892; 487 girls, 405 boys; M<sub>T1 age</sub> = 13.88 years, SD<sub>T1 age</sub> = 1.41 years) with a 1.5-year interval to examine the bidirectional relationships between four types of MCERSs (i.e., self-blame, rumination, catastrophizing, and blaming others) and two internalizing problems (i.e., anxiety and depression). Cross-lagged panel network analysis was used to test our hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The associations between T1 MCERSs and T2 internalizing problems were relatively weak, whereas T1 internalizing problems were strongly related to T2 MCERSs. Moreover, internalizing problems demonstrated a higher out-expected influence, suggesting that they act as catalysts in the network.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings reveal the complex interplays between MCERSs and internalizing problems, underscoring that MCERSs may not be universally harmful and may be reciprocally influenced by adolescents' emotional states.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adolescence\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.70065\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.70065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:认知情绪调节策略不良(MCERSs)被普遍认为是青少年内化问题的原因。这种概念化在理论框架和实际应用中都占主导地位。然而,它可能无法完全捕捉到mcers与内部化问题之间的复杂关系。在本研究中,我们挑战了这一假设,并提出了另一种观点:mcers不仅是内部化问题的原因,而且也是结果。方法:采用两波纵向调查(N = 892,女孩487,男孩405,MT1年龄= 13.88岁,SDT1年龄= 1.41岁),间隔1.5年,研究自我责备、反思、灾难化、责备他人四种mcers类型与焦虑、抑郁两种内化问题之间的双向关系。使用交叉滞后面板网络分析来检验我们的假设。结果:T1期mcers与T2期内化问题的相关性较弱,而T1期内化问题与T2期mcers的相关性较强。此外,内化问题表现出更高的超出预期的影响,表明它们在网络中起到催化剂的作用。结论:这些发现揭示了mcer与内化问题之间复杂的相互作用,强调mcer可能不是普遍有害的,并且可能受到青少年情绪状态的相互影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
More Than Causes: Unveiling Bidirectional Relationships Between Maladaptive Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Internalizing Problems in Adolescents.

Introduction: Maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies (MCERSs) have been generally conceptualized as causes of adolescent internalizing problems. This conceptualization was dominant in both theoretical frameworks and practical applications. However, it may not fully capture the complex relationships between MCERSs and internalizing problems. In this study, we challenge this assumption and propose an alternative perspective: MCERSs are not just causes of internalizing problems but also emerge as outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a two-wave longitudinal survey (N = 892; 487 girls, 405 boys; MT1 age = 13.88 years, SDT1 age = 1.41 years) with a 1.5-year interval to examine the bidirectional relationships between four types of MCERSs (i.e., self-blame, rumination, catastrophizing, and blaming others) and two internalizing problems (i.e., anxiety and depression). Cross-lagged panel network analysis was used to test our hypotheses.

Results: The associations between T1 MCERSs and T2 internalizing problems were relatively weak, whereas T1 internalizing problems were strongly related to T2 MCERSs. Moreover, internalizing problems demonstrated a higher out-expected influence, suggesting that they act as catalysts in the network.

Conclusions: These findings reveal the complex interplays between MCERSs and internalizing problems, underscoring that MCERSs may not be universally harmful and may be reciprocally influenced by adolescents' emotional states.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescence
Journal of Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: The Journal of Adolescence is an international, broad based, cross-disciplinary journal that addresses issues of professional and academic importance concerning development between puberty and the attainment of adult status within society. It provides a forum for all who are concerned with the nature of adolescence, whether involved in teaching, research, guidance, counseling, treatment, or other services. The aim of the journal is to encourage research and foster good practice through publishing both empirical and clinical studies as well as integrative reviews and theoretical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信