加强产妇ACLS培训:改进Peyton四步教学法的有效性评估。

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-10-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S542286
Xiaoqing Zhang, Zhuonan Sun, Qiong Lan, Mao Xu, Xiangyang Guo, Bin Wei
{"title":"加强产妇ACLS培训:改进Peyton四步教学法的有效性评估。","authors":"Xiaoqing Zhang, Zhuonan Sun, Qiong Lan, Mao Xu, Xiangyang Guo, Bin Wei","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S542286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Maternal Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) training is crucial for effective maternal cardiopulmonary resuscitation education. Traditional lecture-based approach for maternal cardiopulmonary resuscitation falls short in providing opportunities for adequate practice and active participating. Peyton's four-step teaching method shows advantages in the acquisition of procedural skills. Its effectiveness is constrained in group settings due to the 1:1 teacher-student ratio requirement. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified Peyton's four-step teaching method in maternal ACLS training, with the objective of optimizing clinical training strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty physicians participating in ACLS training at our hospital from October 2023 to December 2024 were enrolled and randomly divided into an experimental group (n = 30) and a control group (n = 30). The experimental group received the modified Peyton's four-step teaching method, while the control group underwent traditional lecture-based training. Teaching effectiveness was compared through knowledge assessments, skill evaluations, and feedback questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed in knowledge scores between the two groups (experimental group: 94.6 ± 4.1 vs control group: 94.3 ± 3.9, P > 0.05). However, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher accuracy in skill operations, including uterine displacement maneuvers, peripartum cesarean section decision-making, defibrillation, and resuscitation drug administration (P < 0.05). Teamwork performance and adherence to maternal cardiac arrest (CA) protocols were also superior in the experimental group (P < 0.05). Questionnaire results indicated higher satisfaction (4.5 ± 0.7 vs 4.1 ± 0.5, P < 0.05) and greater learning engagement (4.5±0.6 vs 4.0±0.6, P < 0.05) in the experimental group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified Peyton's four-step teaching method significantly enhances physicians' mastery of maternal ACLS skills, improves teamwork capabilities, and elevates both teaching quality and learner satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"1837-1845"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Maternal ACLS Training: Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Modified Peyton's Four-Step Teaching Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoqing Zhang, Zhuonan Sun, Qiong Lan, Mao Xu, Xiangyang Guo, Bin Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S542286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Maternal Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) training is crucial for effective maternal cardiopulmonary resuscitation education. Traditional lecture-based approach for maternal cardiopulmonary resuscitation falls short in providing opportunities for adequate practice and active participating. Peyton's four-step teaching method shows advantages in the acquisition of procedural skills. Its effectiveness is constrained in group settings due to the 1:1 teacher-student ratio requirement. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified Peyton's four-step teaching method in maternal ACLS training, with the objective of optimizing clinical training strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty physicians participating in ACLS training at our hospital from October 2023 to December 2024 were enrolled and randomly divided into an experimental group (n = 30) and a control group (n = 30). The experimental group received the modified Peyton's four-step teaching method, while the control group underwent traditional lecture-based training. Teaching effectiveness was compared through knowledge assessments, skill evaluations, and feedback questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed in knowledge scores between the two groups (experimental group: 94.6 ± 4.1 vs control group: 94.3 ± 3.9, P > 0.05). However, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher accuracy in skill operations, including uterine displacement maneuvers, peripartum cesarean section decision-making, defibrillation, and resuscitation drug administration (P < 0.05). Teamwork performance and adherence to maternal cardiac arrest (CA) protocols were also superior in the experimental group (P < 0.05). Questionnaire results indicated higher satisfaction (4.5 ± 0.7 vs 4.1 ± 0.5, P < 0.05) and greater learning engagement (4.5±0.6 vs 4.0±0.6, P < 0.05) in the experimental group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified Peyton's four-step teaching method significantly enhances physicians' mastery of maternal ACLS skills, improves teamwork capabilities, and elevates both teaching quality and learner satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1837-1845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519962/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S542286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S542286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:产妇高级心血管生命支持(ACLS)培训是有效的产妇心肺复苏教育的关键。传统的以讲座为基础的产妇心肺复苏方法在提供充分的实践和积极参与的机会方面存在不足。佩顿的四步教学法在程序性技能的习得上显示出优势。由于1:1的师生比例要求,其有效性在小组设置中受到限制。本研究旨在评估改进的Peyton四步教学法在产妇ACLS培训中的有效性,以优化临床培训策略。方法:选取2023年10月至2024年12月在我院参加ACLS培训的医师60名,随机分为实验组(n = 30)和对照组(n = 30)。实验组采用改良的佩顿四步教学法,对照组采用传统的授课式训练。通过知识评估、技能评估和反馈问卷对教学效果进行比较。结果:两组患者知识得分差异无统计学意义(实验组:94.6±4.1 vs对照组:94.3±3.9,P < 0.05)。而实验组在子宫移位、围生期剖宫产决策、除颤、复苏药物给药等技能操作上的准确率显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。实验组的团队合作表现和对产妇心脏骤停(CA)方案的依从性也优于对照组(P < 0.05)。问卷调查结果显示,实验组学生满意度(4.5±0.7比4.1±0.5,P < 0.05)较高,学习投入(4.5±0.6比4.0±0.6,P < 0.05)较高。结论:改进的Peyton四步教学法能显著提高医师对产妇ACLS技能的掌握,提高团队合作能力,提高教学质量和学习者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Enhancing Maternal ACLS Training: Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Modified Peyton's Four-Step Teaching Approach.

Enhancing Maternal ACLS Training: Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Modified Peyton's Four-Step Teaching Approach.

Purpose: Maternal Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) training is crucial for effective maternal cardiopulmonary resuscitation education. Traditional lecture-based approach for maternal cardiopulmonary resuscitation falls short in providing opportunities for adequate practice and active participating. Peyton's four-step teaching method shows advantages in the acquisition of procedural skills. Its effectiveness is constrained in group settings due to the 1:1 teacher-student ratio requirement. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified Peyton's four-step teaching method in maternal ACLS training, with the objective of optimizing clinical training strategies.

Methods: Sixty physicians participating in ACLS training at our hospital from October 2023 to December 2024 were enrolled and randomly divided into an experimental group (n = 30) and a control group (n = 30). The experimental group received the modified Peyton's four-step teaching method, while the control group underwent traditional lecture-based training. Teaching effectiveness was compared through knowledge assessments, skill evaluations, and feedback questionnaires.

Results: No significant difference was observed in knowledge scores between the two groups (experimental group: 94.6 ± 4.1 vs control group: 94.3 ± 3.9, P > 0.05). However, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher accuracy in skill operations, including uterine displacement maneuvers, peripartum cesarean section decision-making, defibrillation, and resuscitation drug administration (P < 0.05). Teamwork performance and adherence to maternal cardiac arrest (CA) protocols were also superior in the experimental group (P < 0.05). Questionnaire results indicated higher satisfaction (4.5 ± 0.7 vs 4.1 ± 0.5, P < 0.05) and greater learning engagement (4.5±0.6 vs 4.0±0.6, P < 0.05) in the experimental group.

Conclusion: The modified Peyton's four-step teaching method significantly enhances physicians' mastery of maternal ACLS skills, improves teamwork capabilities, and elevates both teaching quality and learner satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信