Asmaa F Sharif, Zeinab A Kasemy, Samar H A Aloshari
{"title":"评估即学习:临床前医学学生主导的基于场景的选择题生成的混合方法研究","authors":"Asmaa F Sharif, Zeinab A Kasemy, Samar H A Aloshari","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S549385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Learning basic sciences divorced from clinical practices is suboptimal. Several student-centered learning strategies were introduced to enhance self-regulated learning while adopting learning techniques centered on assessment receives much less attention. This study aimed to explore the perception and efficacy of engaging early-phase preclinical medical students in generating scenario-based Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) targeting high cognitive levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a quasi-experimental mixed-method study conducted among preclinical second-year medical students. An intervention group involved students who participated in item creation, and a control group included those who did not. The two groups were exposed to mock exams and were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire and participate in focused group discussions on their perceptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 135 students, 48.9% created from 1 to 10 items. Item creators had significantly higher formative scores (34.3 ±10.5) than non-creators (29.6 ±10.6) (p = 0.010), and their GPA was also significantly better (B+ grade: 42.4% vs 21.7%; p = 0.015). Despite these academic variations, above 75% of the two groups were satisfied or very satisfied with non-significant variations. Formative assessment positively correlated with GPAs (<i>rs</i> = 0.74) and the number of developed items (<i>rs</i> = 0.39). The adopted strategy imposed a positive effect on the learning process and fostered procedural soft skills and student values. It allowed students to experience positive emotions and feelings of entertainment during learning and changed their perception of scenario-based MCQs. Students prefer generating such items in other subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The student-led approach to generating clinical scenario-based MCQs demonstrates significant promise as an innovative pedagogical approach in medical education. Involving preclinical students in developing high cognitive levels of MCQs is not merely a tool for evaluation but a versatile pedagogical strategy that can be adapted to various disciplines to enhance learning and engagement and help students transition to the clinical years.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"1847-1859"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment as Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study on Pre-Clinical Medical Student-Led Generation of Scenario-Based Multiple Choice Questions.\",\"authors\":\"Asmaa F Sharif, Zeinab A Kasemy, Samar H A Aloshari\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S549385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Learning basic sciences divorced from clinical practices is suboptimal. Several student-centered learning strategies were introduced to enhance self-regulated learning while adopting learning techniques centered on assessment receives much less attention. This study aimed to explore the perception and efficacy of engaging early-phase preclinical medical students in generating scenario-based Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) targeting high cognitive levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a quasi-experimental mixed-method study conducted among preclinical second-year medical students. An intervention group involved students who participated in item creation, and a control group included those who did not. The two groups were exposed to mock exams and were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire and participate in focused group discussions on their perceptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 135 students, 48.9% created from 1 to 10 items. Item creators had significantly higher formative scores (34.3 ±10.5) than non-creators (29.6 ±10.6) (p = 0.010), and their GPA was also significantly better (B+ grade: 42.4% vs 21.7%; p = 0.015). Despite these academic variations, above 75% of the two groups were satisfied or very satisfied with non-significant variations. Formative assessment positively correlated with GPAs (<i>rs</i> = 0.74) and the number of developed items (<i>rs</i> = 0.39). The adopted strategy imposed a positive effect on the learning process and fostered procedural soft skills and student values. It allowed students to experience positive emotions and feelings of entertainment during learning and changed their perception of scenario-based MCQs. Students prefer generating such items in other subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The student-led approach to generating clinical scenario-based MCQs demonstrates significant promise as an innovative pedagogical approach in medical education. Involving preclinical students in developing high cognitive levels of MCQs is not merely a tool for evaluation but a versatile pedagogical strategy that can be adapted to various disciplines to enhance learning and engagement and help students transition to the clinical years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1847-1859\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519963/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S549385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S549385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:学习脱离临床实践的基础科学是次优的。几种以学生为中心的学习策略被引入以提高自主学习能力,而采用以评价为中心的学习技巧受到的关注较少。本研究旨在探讨早期临床前医学院学生参与高认知水平情境选择题(mcq)的感知和效果。方法:本研究采用准实验混合方法,在临床前二年级医学生中进行。干预组包括参与项目创作的学生,对照组包括不参与项目创作的学生。这两组人都参加了模拟考试,并被要求完成一份自我管理的问卷,并参与关于他们看法的焦点小组讨论。结果:135名学生中,48.9%的学生创作了1 - 10个题目。项目创造者的形成性得分(34.3±10.5)显著高于非项目创造者(29.6±10.6)(p = 0.010),其GPA也显著优于非项目创造者(B+: 42.4% vs 21.7%, p = 0.015)。尽管存在这些学术差异,但两组中75%以上的人对非显著差异感到满意或非常满意。形成性评价与gpa (rs = 0.74)和开发项目数(rs = 0.39)正相关。所采用的策略对学习过程产生了积极的影响,培养了程序性软技能和学生价值观。它让学生在学习过程中体验到积极的情绪和娱乐的感觉,并改变了他们对基于场景的mcq的看法。学生们更喜欢在其他科目中生成这样的题目。结论:以学生为主导的基于临床场景的mcq生成方法在医学教育中作为一种创新的教学方法具有重要的前景。让临床前学生参与发展高认知水平的mcq不仅仅是一种评估工具,而且是一种通用的教学策略,可以适应各种学科,以增强学习和参与,帮助学生过渡到临床阶段。
Assessment as Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study on Pre-Clinical Medical Student-Led Generation of Scenario-Based Multiple Choice Questions.
Purpose: Learning basic sciences divorced from clinical practices is suboptimal. Several student-centered learning strategies were introduced to enhance self-regulated learning while adopting learning techniques centered on assessment receives much less attention. This study aimed to explore the perception and efficacy of engaging early-phase preclinical medical students in generating scenario-based Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) targeting high cognitive levels.
Methods: This study is a quasi-experimental mixed-method study conducted among preclinical second-year medical students. An intervention group involved students who participated in item creation, and a control group included those who did not. The two groups were exposed to mock exams and were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire and participate in focused group discussions on their perceptions.
Results: Out of 135 students, 48.9% created from 1 to 10 items. Item creators had significantly higher formative scores (34.3 ±10.5) than non-creators (29.6 ±10.6) (p = 0.010), and their GPA was also significantly better (B+ grade: 42.4% vs 21.7%; p = 0.015). Despite these academic variations, above 75% of the two groups were satisfied or very satisfied with non-significant variations. Formative assessment positively correlated with GPAs (rs = 0.74) and the number of developed items (rs = 0.39). The adopted strategy imposed a positive effect on the learning process and fostered procedural soft skills and student values. It allowed students to experience positive emotions and feelings of entertainment during learning and changed their perception of scenario-based MCQs. Students prefer generating such items in other subjects.
Conclusion: The student-led approach to generating clinical scenario-based MCQs demonstrates significant promise as an innovative pedagogical approach in medical education. Involving preclinical students in developing high cognitive levels of MCQs is not merely a tool for evaluation but a versatile pedagogical strategy that can be adapted to various disciplines to enhance learning and engagement and help students transition to the clinical years.