中国公共卫生人力资源公平分配的决定因素:使用RIF-I-OLS分解的多维分析

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Hao Wang, Guoliang Ma, Hui Lu
{"title":"中国公共卫生人力资源公平分配的决定因素:使用RIF-I-OLS分解的多维分析","authors":"Hao Wang, Guoliang Ma, Hui Lu","doi":"10.1186/s12960-025-01019-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid economic development and urbanization in China have improved population health outcomes, but exacerbated inequalities in the allocation of public health human resources (PHHR). Existing studies largely rely on static measures and offer limited insights into the mechanisms driving these disparities. This study systematically identifies and quantifies the determinants influencing public health workforce allocation in China, aiming to provide empirical evidence to guide policy interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed the allocation of PHHR across 31 Chinese provinces from 2018 to 2022, employing four inequality indices: Gini coefficients (Gini), concentration index (CI), absolute Gini (AGini), and absolute concentration index (ACI). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and bivariate correlation analyses were used to assess temporal and regional variations. The recentered influence function-index-ordinary least squares (RIF-I-OLS) method was applied to decompose these inequality indices. This approach quantified the contributions of key factors, including the illiteracy rate among the population aged 15 years and above, government health expenditure, number of professional public health institutions (PPHI), mortality rate from Class A and B infectious diseases (IDs), and life expectancy (LE), while distinguishing between characteristic effects and coefficient effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2018 and 2019, inequity in PHHR allocation increased (Gini: 0.3792-0.3844; CI 0.0215-0.0495). In contrast, from 2019 to 2022, allocation equity improved (Gini: 0.3715; CI 0.0279). A greater number of PPHIs, a lower mortality rate of class A and B IDs, and longer LE helped mitigate inequalities, whereas a lower illiteracy rate among the population aged ≥ 15 years and increased governmental health expenditure exacerbated disparities. Inequality in PHHR allocation during 2018-2019 was primarily driven by characteristic effects, whereas in 2021-2022, coefficient effects became dominant, underscoring the role of institutional and systemic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the equity of PHHR allocation in China has shown modest improvement, structural and institutional factors remain key determinants of lingering inequities. This highlights the need for targeted policies to optimize the distribution of the public health workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":39823,"journal":{"name":"Human Resources for Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of equitable public health human resource allocation in China: a multidimensional analysis using RIF-I-OLS decomposition.\",\"authors\":\"Hao Wang, Guoliang Ma, Hui Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12960-025-01019-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid economic development and urbanization in China have improved population health outcomes, but exacerbated inequalities in the allocation of public health human resources (PHHR). Existing studies largely rely on static measures and offer limited insights into the mechanisms driving these disparities. This study systematically identifies and quantifies the determinants influencing public health workforce allocation in China, aiming to provide empirical evidence to guide policy interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed the allocation of PHHR across 31 Chinese provinces from 2018 to 2022, employing four inequality indices: Gini coefficients (Gini), concentration index (CI), absolute Gini (AGini), and absolute concentration index (ACI). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and bivariate correlation analyses were used to assess temporal and regional variations. The recentered influence function-index-ordinary least squares (RIF-I-OLS) method was applied to decompose these inequality indices. This approach quantified the contributions of key factors, including the illiteracy rate among the population aged 15 years and above, government health expenditure, number of professional public health institutions (PPHI), mortality rate from Class A and B infectious diseases (IDs), and life expectancy (LE), while distinguishing between characteristic effects and coefficient effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2018 and 2019, inequity in PHHR allocation increased (Gini: 0.3792-0.3844; CI 0.0215-0.0495). In contrast, from 2019 to 2022, allocation equity improved (Gini: 0.3715; CI 0.0279). A greater number of PPHIs, a lower mortality rate of class A and B IDs, and longer LE helped mitigate inequalities, whereas a lower illiteracy rate among the population aged ≥ 15 years and increased governmental health expenditure exacerbated disparities. Inequality in PHHR allocation during 2018-2019 was primarily driven by characteristic effects, whereas in 2021-2022, coefficient effects became dominant, underscoring the role of institutional and systemic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the equity of PHHR allocation in China has shown modest improvement, structural and institutional factors remain key determinants of lingering inequities. This highlights the need for targeted policies to optimize the distribution of the public health workforce.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Resources for Health\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Resources for Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-025-01019-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resources for Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-025-01019-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中国经济的快速发展和城市化改善了人口健康状况,但也加剧了公共卫生人力资源分配的不平等。现有的研究主要依赖于静态测量,对导致这些差异的机制提供的见解有限。本研究系统地识别和量化了影响中国公共卫生人力资源配置的决定因素,旨在为指导政策干预提供经验证据。方法:采用基尼系数(Gini)、集中度指数(CI)、绝对基尼系数(AGini)和绝对集中度指数(ACI) 4个不平等指数,分析2018 - 2022年中国31个省份的PHHR分配情况。采用双向方差分析(ANOVA)和双变量相关分析来评估时间和区域差异。采用重中心影响函数-指数-普通最小二乘(RIF-I-OLS)方法对这些不等式指标进行分解。该方法量化了关键因素的贡献,包括15岁及以上人口的文盲率、政府卫生支出、专业公共卫生机构的数量、甲类和乙类传染病的死亡率和预期寿命,同时区分了特征效应和系数效应。结果:2018 - 2019年,PHHR分配不公平现象增加(基尼系数:0.3792 ~ 0.3844;CI: 0.0215 ~ 0.0495)。相比之下,从2019年到2022年,分配公平有所改善(基尼系数:0.3715;CI: 0.0279)。更多的pphi、较低的A类和B类id死亡率以及较长的寿命有助于缓解不平等,而年龄≥15岁人口中较低的文盲率和政府卫生支出的增加则加剧了不平等。2018-2019年,PHHR分配不均主要由特征效应驱动,2021-2022年,系数效应主导,制度性和系统性因素的作用凸显。结论:虽然中国PHHR分配的公平性略有改善,但结构性和体制性因素仍然是不公平现象持续存在的关键决定因素。这突出表明需要制定有针对性的政策,以优化公共卫生人力的分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determinants of equitable public health human resource allocation in China: a multidimensional analysis using RIF-I-OLS decomposition.

Background: Rapid economic development and urbanization in China have improved population health outcomes, but exacerbated inequalities in the allocation of public health human resources (PHHR). Existing studies largely rely on static measures and offer limited insights into the mechanisms driving these disparities. This study systematically identifies and quantifies the determinants influencing public health workforce allocation in China, aiming to provide empirical evidence to guide policy interventions.

Methods: This study analyzed the allocation of PHHR across 31 Chinese provinces from 2018 to 2022, employing four inequality indices: Gini coefficients (Gini), concentration index (CI), absolute Gini (AGini), and absolute concentration index (ACI). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and bivariate correlation analyses were used to assess temporal and regional variations. The recentered influence function-index-ordinary least squares (RIF-I-OLS) method was applied to decompose these inequality indices. This approach quantified the contributions of key factors, including the illiteracy rate among the population aged 15 years and above, government health expenditure, number of professional public health institutions (PPHI), mortality rate from Class A and B infectious diseases (IDs), and life expectancy (LE), while distinguishing between characteristic effects and coefficient effects.

Results: Between 2018 and 2019, inequity in PHHR allocation increased (Gini: 0.3792-0.3844; CI 0.0215-0.0495). In contrast, from 2019 to 2022, allocation equity improved (Gini: 0.3715; CI 0.0279). A greater number of PPHIs, a lower mortality rate of class A and B IDs, and longer LE helped mitigate inequalities, whereas a lower illiteracy rate among the population aged ≥ 15 years and increased governmental health expenditure exacerbated disparities. Inequality in PHHR allocation during 2018-2019 was primarily driven by characteristic effects, whereas in 2021-2022, coefficient effects became dominant, underscoring the role of institutional and systemic factors.

Conclusions: While the equity of PHHR allocation in China has shown modest improvement, structural and institutional factors remain key determinants of lingering inequities. This highlights the need for targeted policies to optimize the distribution of the public health workforce.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Resources for Health
Human Resources for Health Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
102
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Resources for Health is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal covering all aspects of planning, producing and managing the health workforce - all those who provide health services worldwide. Human Resources for Health aims to disseminate research on health workforce policy, the health labour market, health workforce practice, development of knowledge tools and implementation mechanisms nationally and internationally; as well as specific features of the health workforce, such as the impact of management of health workers" performance and its link with health outcomes. The journal encourages debate on health sector reforms and their link with human resources issues, a hitherto-neglected area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信