Hanping Li, Kuiling Shen, Jingwan Han, Yongjian Liu, Lixuan Zhang, Xiling Liu, Lei Jia, Bohan Zhang, Xiaolin Wang, Jingyun Li, Erhei Dai, Huimin Yan, Lin Li
{"title":"相同耐药突变对B亚型和CRF01_AE HIV-1株逆转录酶抑制剂的体外敏感性比较","authors":"Hanping Li, Kuiling Shen, Jingwan Han, Yongjian Liu, Lixuan Zhang, Xiling Liu, Lei Jia, Bohan Zhang, Xiaolin Wang, Jingyun Li, Erhei Dai, Huimin Yan, Lin Li","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-04144-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the recommended drugs for first-line regimens in HIV-1 infections, reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) are widely used around the world. To escape from the selective pressure imposed by RTIs, HIV-1 constantly mutates to adapt to its environment. However, it is unclear how resistance mutations emerging in response to RTIs affect drug susceptibility in strains of different subtypes. To explored this phenomenon, typical RTI-induced drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were selected to test their effects on the susceptibility of different subtype strains. The same RTI-induced DRMs were introduced into infectious clones of subtypes B and CRF01_AE, and phenotypic resistance tests were performed to compare the differences in susceptibilities to various RTIs. The experimental results revealed that mutations such as M41L and V106M were more likely to occur in the CRF01_AE subtype. However, phenotypic analysis of reconstructed clones containing these resistance mutations revealed that CRF01_AE exhibited significantly lower sensitivity to RTIs than did subtype B. For azvudine (FNC), a novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), the resistance level of CRF01_AE was significantly lower than that of subtype B. In conclusion, the same mutation affecting resistance to RTIs can have significantly different impacts depending on the subtype of the HIV-1 strain. This finding serves as a reference for guiding rational drug use in the future. Moreover, relying solely on phenotypic experimental results from subtype B to evaluate resistance levels of unclear mutations in other subtypes may be inappropriate and should be approached with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"35936"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro comparison of the susceptibilities of the same drug resistance mutations to reverse-transcriptase inhibitors of subtype B and CRF01_AE HIV-1 strains.\",\"authors\":\"Hanping Li, Kuiling Shen, Jingwan Han, Yongjian Liu, Lixuan Zhang, Xiling Liu, Lei Jia, Bohan Zhang, Xiaolin Wang, Jingyun Li, Erhei Dai, Huimin Yan, Lin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-04144-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As the recommended drugs for first-line regimens in HIV-1 infections, reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) are widely used around the world. To escape from the selective pressure imposed by RTIs, HIV-1 constantly mutates to adapt to its environment. However, it is unclear how resistance mutations emerging in response to RTIs affect drug susceptibility in strains of different subtypes. To explored this phenomenon, typical RTI-induced drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were selected to test their effects on the susceptibility of different subtype strains. The same RTI-induced DRMs were introduced into infectious clones of subtypes B and CRF01_AE, and phenotypic resistance tests were performed to compare the differences in susceptibilities to various RTIs. The experimental results revealed that mutations such as M41L and V106M were more likely to occur in the CRF01_AE subtype. However, phenotypic analysis of reconstructed clones containing these resistance mutations revealed that CRF01_AE exhibited significantly lower sensitivity to RTIs than did subtype B. For azvudine (FNC), a novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), the resistance level of CRF01_AE was significantly lower than that of subtype B. In conclusion, the same mutation affecting resistance to RTIs can have significantly different impacts depending on the subtype of the HIV-1 strain. This finding serves as a reference for guiding rational drug use in the future. Moreover, relying solely on phenotypic experimental results from subtype B to evaluate resistance levels of unclear mutations in other subtypes may be inappropriate and should be approached with caution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"35936\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528743/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04144-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04144-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
In vitro comparison of the susceptibilities of the same drug resistance mutations to reverse-transcriptase inhibitors of subtype B and CRF01_AE HIV-1 strains.
As the recommended drugs for first-line regimens in HIV-1 infections, reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) are widely used around the world. To escape from the selective pressure imposed by RTIs, HIV-1 constantly mutates to adapt to its environment. However, it is unclear how resistance mutations emerging in response to RTIs affect drug susceptibility in strains of different subtypes. To explored this phenomenon, typical RTI-induced drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were selected to test their effects on the susceptibility of different subtype strains. The same RTI-induced DRMs were introduced into infectious clones of subtypes B and CRF01_AE, and phenotypic resistance tests were performed to compare the differences in susceptibilities to various RTIs. The experimental results revealed that mutations such as M41L and V106M were more likely to occur in the CRF01_AE subtype. However, phenotypic analysis of reconstructed clones containing these resistance mutations revealed that CRF01_AE exhibited significantly lower sensitivity to RTIs than did subtype B. For azvudine (FNC), a novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), the resistance level of CRF01_AE was significantly lower than that of subtype B. In conclusion, the same mutation affecting resistance to RTIs can have significantly different impacts depending on the subtype of the HIV-1 strain. This finding serves as a reference for guiding rational drug use in the future. Moreover, relying solely on phenotypic experimental results from subtype B to evaluate resistance levels of unclear mutations in other subtypes may be inappropriate and should be approached with caution.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.