Sonja Omlor, Norbert Scherbaum, Inken Höller, Thomas Forkmann
{"title":"心率变异性与自杀想法和行为:系统评价的研究方案。","authors":"Sonja Omlor, Norbert Scherbaum, Inken Höller, Thomas Forkmann","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02954-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As 700,000 people per year commit suicide worldwide, improvements in suicide prevention and the prediction of suicide attempts or suicide in clinical care are mandatory. This systematic review aims to examine heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) as risk factors for the development of suicidal thoughts and behaviour in clinical and non-clinical populations.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA). We will retrieve relevant literatures across the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Additionally, we will manually search the reference lists of all relevant articles. If studies are published or translated in English and measure HRV or HR and suicidal thoughts or behaviour, they will be included. Two reviewers will independently complete the article selection, data extraction and risk of bias ratings. A third reviewer will resolve disagreements. Tabular and narrative synthesis will be done accordingly and a risk of bias assessment will be conducted by the QUIPS (Quality In Prognosis) tool.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review will present evidence from which conclusions can be made regarding the relationship between HRV and HR and suicidal thoughts and behaviour. By identifying risk factors associated with suicidality and differentiating between factors for suicidal thoughts versus behaviour, this review will potentially contribute theoretically to our understanding of the causal factors involved in influencing increasing levels of suicidality.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This is a systematic review of published literature and thereby ethical approval was not sought. Results will be disseminated through conferences and publications in relevant peer-reviewed journals.</p><p><strong>Strength and limitations of this study: </strong>The results will have important implications for risk prediction for suicidal thoughts and behaviour. The protocol follows the PRISMA guidelines (Page et al.,BMJ 372:n71,2021). Thus, two reviewers will perform data extraction and risk of bias evaluation separately. We will exclude non-English translated or published studies, which might be a limitation and bias against non-English-speaking countries.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023460068.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"193"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart rate variability and suicidal thoughts and behaviour: study protocol for a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Sonja Omlor, Norbert Scherbaum, Inken Höller, Thomas Forkmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-025-02954-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As 700,000 people per year commit suicide worldwide, improvements in suicide prevention and the prediction of suicide attempts or suicide in clinical care are mandatory. This systematic review aims to examine heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) as risk factors for the development of suicidal thoughts and behaviour in clinical and non-clinical populations.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA). We will retrieve relevant literatures across the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Additionally, we will manually search the reference lists of all relevant articles. If studies are published or translated in English and measure HRV or HR and suicidal thoughts or behaviour, they will be included. Two reviewers will independently complete the article selection, data extraction and risk of bias ratings. A third reviewer will resolve disagreements. Tabular and narrative synthesis will be done accordingly and a risk of bias assessment will be conducted by the QUIPS (Quality In Prognosis) tool.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review will present evidence from which conclusions can be made regarding the relationship between HRV and HR and suicidal thoughts and behaviour. By identifying risk factors associated with suicidality and differentiating between factors for suicidal thoughts versus behaviour, this review will potentially contribute theoretically to our understanding of the causal factors involved in influencing increasing levels of suicidality.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This is a systematic review of published literature and thereby ethical approval was not sought. Results will be disseminated through conferences and publications in relevant peer-reviewed journals.</p><p><strong>Strength and limitations of this study: </strong>The results will have important implications for risk prediction for suicidal thoughts and behaviour. The protocol follows the PRISMA guidelines (Page et al.,BMJ 372:n71,2021). Thus, two reviewers will perform data extraction and risk of bias evaluation separately. We will exclude non-English translated or published studies, which might be a limitation and bias against non-English-speaking countries.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023460068.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02954-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02954-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:由于全世界每年有70万人自杀,因此在临床护理中改善自杀预防和预测自杀企图或自杀是强制性的。本系统综述旨在检查心率(HR)和心率变异性(HRV)在临床和非临床人群中作为自杀念头和行为发展的危险因素。方法和分析:系统评价将按照系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行。我们将从以下数据库检索相关文献:PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library和Web of Science。此外,我们将手动搜索所有相关文章的参考文献列表。如果研究发表或翻译为英文,并测量HRV或HR和自杀念头或行为,它们将被纳入。两名审稿人将独立完成文章选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评级。第三位审稿人将解决分歧。将据此进行表格和叙述综合,并通过QUIPS(预后质量)工具进行偏倚风险评估。讨论:本系统综述将提供证据,从中可以得出关于HRV和HR与自杀念头和行为之间关系的结论。通过识别与自杀相关的危险因素,并区分自杀念头与自杀行为的因素,本综述将在理论上有助于我们理解影响自杀率上升的因果因素。伦理与传播:这是对已发表文献的系统综述,因此不寻求伦理批准。结果将通过会议和有关同行评议期刊的出版物进行传播。本研究的优势和局限性:研究结果将对自杀想法和行为的风险预测具有重要意义。该方案遵循PRISMA指南(Page等人,BMJ 372:n71,2021)。因此,两位审稿人将分别进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。我们将排除非英语翻译或发表的研究,这可能是对非英语国家的限制和偏见。系统评价注册:PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023460068。
Heart rate variability and suicidal thoughts and behaviour: study protocol for a systematic review.
Background: As 700,000 people per year commit suicide worldwide, improvements in suicide prevention and the prediction of suicide attempts or suicide in clinical care are mandatory. This systematic review aims to examine heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) as risk factors for the development of suicidal thoughts and behaviour in clinical and non-clinical populations.
Methods and analysis: The systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA). We will retrieve relevant literatures across the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Additionally, we will manually search the reference lists of all relevant articles. If studies are published or translated in English and measure HRV or HR and suicidal thoughts or behaviour, they will be included. Two reviewers will independently complete the article selection, data extraction and risk of bias ratings. A third reviewer will resolve disagreements. Tabular and narrative synthesis will be done accordingly and a risk of bias assessment will be conducted by the QUIPS (Quality In Prognosis) tool.
Discussion: This systematic review will present evidence from which conclusions can be made regarding the relationship between HRV and HR and suicidal thoughts and behaviour. By identifying risk factors associated with suicidality and differentiating between factors for suicidal thoughts versus behaviour, this review will potentially contribute theoretically to our understanding of the causal factors involved in influencing increasing levels of suicidality.
Ethics and dissemination: This is a systematic review of published literature and thereby ethical approval was not sought. Results will be disseminated through conferences and publications in relevant peer-reviewed journals.
Strength and limitations of this study: The results will have important implications for risk prediction for suicidal thoughts and behaviour. The protocol follows the PRISMA guidelines (Page et al.,BMJ 372:n71,2021). Thus, two reviewers will perform data extraction and risk of bias evaluation separately. We will exclude non-English translated or published studies, which might be a limitation and bias against non-English-speaking countries.
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.