{"title":"用于伤口愈合的Kelulut蜂蜜混合明胶-聚乙烯醇水凝胶:制备和体外表征。","authors":"Andik Nisa Zahra Zainuddin, Raniya Razif, Aifa Asyhira Khairul Nizam, Manira Maarof, Nur Izzah Md Fadilah, Yang-Hee Kim, Ebrahim Mahmoudi, Mh Busra Fauzi","doi":"10.3390/polym17192618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hydrogels are attractive biomaterials for skin replacement and tissue regeneration, offering advantages over split-skin grafts for large or irregular wounds. Honey-containing hydrogels are of particular interest, combining honey's natural healing properties with the versatility of hydrogel matrices. This study aimed to develop a biocompatible, biodegradable, and mechanically stable hydrogel as a cutaneous substitute. To achieve this, different formulations were prepared using gelatin (GE), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and Kelulut honey (KH). The formulations were designated as: GE-PVA (6% (<i>w</i>/<i>v</i>) GE: 5% (<i>w</i>/<i>v</i>) PVA, without KH), GE-PVA-H1 (containing 1% (<i>v</i>/<i>v</i>) KH), GE-PVA-H5 (containing 5% (<i>v</i>/<i>v</i>) KH), and GE-PVA-H10 (containing 10% (<i>v</i>/<i>v</i>) KH). All formulations were crosslinked with 0.1% (<i>w</i>/<i>v</i>) genipin (GNP). GE-PVA-H1 and GE-PVA-H1-GNP showed swelling ratios of 110.18 ± 20.14% and 86.31 ± 14.27%, lower than GE-PVA-H5 (125.79 ± 23.76%), GE-PVA-H10 (132.79 ± 20.86%), and their crosslinked counterparts. All formulations had WVTR <1500 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>, with GE-PVA-H1-GNP at 501.21 ± 41.35 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>, GE-PVA-H5-GNP at 473.77 ± 44.10 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>, and GE-PVA-H10-GNP at 467.51 ± 73.59 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>. GE-PVA-H1-GNP exhibited the slowest biodegradation (0.0036 ± 0.0003 g/h vs. 0.0096-0.0206 g/h for other groups). Contact angle was lowest for GE-PVA-H1-GNP (38.46° ± 3.89°), confirming higher hydrophilicity compared with GE-PVA-H5/H10 groups. Resilience (98.85% ± 1.03%) and compression strength (77.42% ± 7.17%) of GE-PVA-H1-GNP were comparable to GE-PVA-H5-GNP and GE-PVA-H10-GNP. MTT assays confirmed cytocompatibility across all groups. Collectively, GE-PVA-H1-GNP emerged as the optimal formulation, combining mechanical stability, hydrophilicity, and biocompatibility for wound healing applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":20416,"journal":{"name":"Polymers","volume":"17 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12526602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kelulut Honey-Incorporated Hybrid Gelatin-PVA Hydrogel for Wound Healing: Fabrication and In Vitro Characterization.\",\"authors\":\"Andik Nisa Zahra Zainuddin, Raniya Razif, Aifa Asyhira Khairul Nizam, Manira Maarof, Nur Izzah Md Fadilah, Yang-Hee Kim, Ebrahim Mahmoudi, Mh Busra Fauzi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/polym17192618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hydrogels are attractive biomaterials for skin replacement and tissue regeneration, offering advantages over split-skin grafts for large or irregular wounds. Honey-containing hydrogels are of particular interest, combining honey's natural healing properties with the versatility of hydrogel matrices. This study aimed to develop a biocompatible, biodegradable, and mechanically stable hydrogel as a cutaneous substitute. To achieve this, different formulations were prepared using gelatin (GE), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and Kelulut honey (KH). The formulations were designated as: GE-PVA (6% (<i>w</i>/<i>v</i>) GE: 5% (<i>w</i>/<i>v</i>) PVA, without KH), GE-PVA-H1 (containing 1% (<i>v</i>/<i>v</i>) KH), GE-PVA-H5 (containing 5% (<i>v</i>/<i>v</i>) KH), and GE-PVA-H10 (containing 10% (<i>v</i>/<i>v</i>) KH). All formulations were crosslinked with 0.1% (<i>w</i>/<i>v</i>) genipin (GNP). GE-PVA-H1 and GE-PVA-H1-GNP showed swelling ratios of 110.18 ± 20.14% and 86.31 ± 14.27%, lower than GE-PVA-H5 (125.79 ± 23.76%), GE-PVA-H10 (132.79 ± 20.86%), and their crosslinked counterparts. All formulations had WVTR <1500 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>, with GE-PVA-H1-GNP at 501.21 ± 41.35 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>, GE-PVA-H5-GNP at 473.77 ± 44.10 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>, and GE-PVA-H10-GNP at 467.51 ± 73.59 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>. GE-PVA-H1-GNP exhibited the slowest biodegradation (0.0036 ± 0.0003 g/h vs. 0.0096-0.0206 g/h for other groups). Contact angle was lowest for GE-PVA-H1-GNP (38.46° ± 3.89°), confirming higher hydrophilicity compared with GE-PVA-H5/H10 groups. Resilience (98.85% ± 1.03%) and compression strength (77.42% ± 7.17%) of GE-PVA-H1-GNP were comparable to GE-PVA-H5-GNP and GE-PVA-H10-GNP. MTT assays confirmed cytocompatibility across all groups. Collectively, GE-PVA-H1-GNP emerged as the optimal formulation, combining mechanical stability, hydrophilicity, and biocompatibility for wound healing applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polymers\",\"volume\":\"17 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12526602/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polymers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17192618\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLYMER SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polymers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17192618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Kelulut Honey-Incorporated Hybrid Gelatin-PVA Hydrogel for Wound Healing: Fabrication and In Vitro Characterization.
Hydrogels are attractive biomaterials for skin replacement and tissue regeneration, offering advantages over split-skin grafts for large or irregular wounds. Honey-containing hydrogels are of particular interest, combining honey's natural healing properties with the versatility of hydrogel matrices. This study aimed to develop a biocompatible, biodegradable, and mechanically stable hydrogel as a cutaneous substitute. To achieve this, different formulations were prepared using gelatin (GE), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and Kelulut honey (KH). The formulations were designated as: GE-PVA (6% (w/v) GE: 5% (w/v) PVA, without KH), GE-PVA-H1 (containing 1% (v/v) KH), GE-PVA-H5 (containing 5% (v/v) KH), and GE-PVA-H10 (containing 10% (v/v) KH). All formulations were crosslinked with 0.1% (w/v) genipin (GNP). GE-PVA-H1 and GE-PVA-H1-GNP showed swelling ratios of 110.18 ± 20.14% and 86.31 ± 14.27%, lower than GE-PVA-H5 (125.79 ± 23.76%), GE-PVA-H10 (132.79 ± 20.86%), and their crosslinked counterparts. All formulations had WVTR <1500 g/m-2h-1, with GE-PVA-H1-GNP at 501.21 ± 41.35 g/m-2h-1, GE-PVA-H5-GNP at 473.77 ± 44.10 g/m-2h-1, and GE-PVA-H10-GNP at 467.51 ± 73.59 g/m-2h-1. GE-PVA-H1-GNP exhibited the slowest biodegradation (0.0036 ± 0.0003 g/h vs. 0.0096-0.0206 g/h for other groups). Contact angle was lowest for GE-PVA-H1-GNP (38.46° ± 3.89°), confirming higher hydrophilicity compared with GE-PVA-H5/H10 groups. Resilience (98.85% ± 1.03%) and compression strength (77.42% ± 7.17%) of GE-PVA-H1-GNP were comparable to GE-PVA-H5-GNP and GE-PVA-H10-GNP. MTT assays confirmed cytocompatibility across all groups. Collectively, GE-PVA-H1-GNP emerged as the optimal formulation, combining mechanical stability, hydrophilicity, and biocompatibility for wound healing applications.
期刊介绍:
Polymers (ISSN 2073-4360) is an international, open access journal of polymer science. It publishes research papers, short communications and review papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Polymers provides an interdisciplinary forum for publishing papers which advance the fields of (i) polymerization methods, (ii) theory, simulation, and modeling, (iii) understanding of new physical phenomena, (iv) advances in characterization techniques, and (v) harnessing of self-assembly and biological strategies for producing complex multifunctional structures.