理解黑人-白人酒精结果的“悖论”:以黑人和大学生为重点,考察高努力应对和健康行为。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rachel Ayala Guzman, Abby L Braitman
{"title":"理解黑人-白人酒精结果的“悖论”:以黑人和大学生为重点,考察高努力应对和健康行为。","authors":"Rachel Ayala Guzman, Abby L Braitman","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02694-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite experiencing more physical health disadvantages and psychosocial stressors, Black Americans consistently report better mental health outcomes compared to White Americans-a phenomenon commonly referred to as the Black-White health paradox. Alcohol research has identified another racial paradox suggesting Black Americans are at greater risk for alcohol-related problems despite drinking less than White Americans, which is known as the Black-White alcohol paradox. While both paradoxes are well-documented, few studies have examined their potential overlap or how insights from one might inform understanding of the other. Although the alcohol paradox is usually examined among older adults, it may be important to consider factors related to the health paradox among a younger population at-risk for problematic alcohol use: college students. This narrative review argues the importance of examining high-effort-coping (HEC; i.e., John Henryism), a culturally-relevant form of coping with social and economic adversity that has primarily been examined among Black populations. HEC is associated with poorer physical health yet better mental health, similar to the Black-White health paradox. Little is known on how HEC may play a role in health-harming behaviors, such as alcohol use. This paper aims to (1) review and highlight gaps in research using Black and White samples that have examined HEC in relation to health behaviors and college student health outcomes, (2) review studies on HEC and substance use and how it can be applicable to college students, and (3) offer recommendations for integrating HEC in future health behavior research using the Black-White alcohol paradox as an example.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the \\\"Paradox\\\" in Black-White Alcohol Outcomes: Examining High-Effort Coping and Health Behaviors with a Focus on Black Populations and College Students.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Ayala Guzman, Abby L Braitman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-025-02694-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite experiencing more physical health disadvantages and psychosocial stressors, Black Americans consistently report better mental health outcomes compared to White Americans-a phenomenon commonly referred to as the Black-White health paradox. Alcohol research has identified another racial paradox suggesting Black Americans are at greater risk for alcohol-related problems despite drinking less than White Americans, which is known as the Black-White alcohol paradox. While both paradoxes are well-documented, few studies have examined their potential overlap or how insights from one might inform understanding of the other. Although the alcohol paradox is usually examined among older adults, it may be important to consider factors related to the health paradox among a younger population at-risk for problematic alcohol use: college students. This narrative review argues the importance of examining high-effort-coping (HEC; i.e., John Henryism), a culturally-relevant form of coping with social and economic adversity that has primarily been examined among Black populations. HEC is associated with poorer physical health yet better mental health, similar to the Black-White health paradox. Little is known on how HEC may play a role in health-harming behaviors, such as alcohol use. This paper aims to (1) review and highlight gaps in research using Black and White samples that have examined HEC in relation to health behaviors and college student health outcomes, (2) review studies on HEC and substance use and how it can be applicable to college students, and (3) offer recommendations for integrating HEC in future health behavior research using the Black-White alcohol paradox as an example.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02694-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02694-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管经历了更多的身体健康缺陷和社会心理压力,美国黑人的心理健康状况一直比美国白人好——这种现象通常被称为“黑人-白人健康悖论”。酒精研究发现了另一个种族悖论,即美国黑人尽管比白人饮酒少,但患酒精相关疾病的风险更大,这被称为“黑人-白人酒精悖论”。虽然这两个悖论都有充分的证据,但很少有研究调查它们的潜在重叠,或者一个人的见解如何影响对另一个人的理解。虽然酒精悖论通常是在老年人中进行研究,但考虑与有问题饮酒风险的年轻人群(大学生)的健康悖论相关的因素可能很重要。这篇叙事性评论论述了研究高度努力应对(HEC,即约翰·亨利主义)的重要性,这是一种与文化相关的应对社会和经济逆境的形式,主要在黑人群体中进行了研究。HEC与较差的身体健康和较好的心理健康有关,类似于黑-白健康悖论。HEC如何在危害健康的行为(如饮酒)中发挥作用尚不清楚。本文旨在(1)回顾和强调HEC与健康行为和大学生健康结果之间关系研究的空白,(2)回顾HEC与物质使用的研究以及它如何适用于大学生,(3)以黑-白酒精悖论为例,提出将HEC纳入未来健康行为研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the "Paradox" in Black-White Alcohol Outcomes: Examining High-Effort Coping and Health Behaviors with a Focus on Black Populations and College Students.

Despite experiencing more physical health disadvantages and psychosocial stressors, Black Americans consistently report better mental health outcomes compared to White Americans-a phenomenon commonly referred to as the Black-White health paradox. Alcohol research has identified another racial paradox suggesting Black Americans are at greater risk for alcohol-related problems despite drinking less than White Americans, which is known as the Black-White alcohol paradox. While both paradoxes are well-documented, few studies have examined their potential overlap or how insights from one might inform understanding of the other. Although the alcohol paradox is usually examined among older adults, it may be important to consider factors related to the health paradox among a younger population at-risk for problematic alcohol use: college students. This narrative review argues the importance of examining high-effort-coping (HEC; i.e., John Henryism), a culturally-relevant form of coping with social and economic adversity that has primarily been examined among Black populations. HEC is associated with poorer physical health yet better mental health, similar to the Black-White health paradox. Little is known on how HEC may play a role in health-harming behaviors, such as alcohol use. This paper aims to (1) review and highlight gaps in research using Black and White samples that have examined HEC in relation to health behaviors and college student health outcomes, (2) review studies on HEC and substance use and how it can be applicable to college students, and (3) offer recommendations for integrating HEC in future health behavior research using the Black-White alcohol paradox as an example.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信