{"title":"激光治疗外阴硬化地衣的疗效和安全性:系统评价。","authors":"Dongmei Wei, Jian Meng, Qiao Li, Yajing Wang, Yueyue Chen, Xiaoyu Niu","doi":"10.1002/lsm.70062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study systematically reviews randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating laser therapy for vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) to assess its efficacy and safety, aiming to inform clinical management and guideline development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RCTs on laser treatment for VLS were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to January 2025, limited to English literature. References from included studies were also screened. Data on study characteristics, laser parameters, outcome measures, measurement tools, and assessment time points were extracted and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs (332 patients) reported 19 outcomes and 19 measurement tools, each used a total of 28 times. Symptoms and signs were most frequently reported and commonly measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Most trials indicated improvements in symptoms, signs, quality of life (QoL), and histology after laser therapy. Three studies reported greater symptom/sign improvement than topical corticosteroids (p < 0.05), and three found higher patient satisfaction (p < 0.05). Two studies showed good tolerability via VAS. Adverse events occurred in five studies (147 patients), including five mild cases (local irritation, blisters, urinary tract infection, itching, and pain). Due to heterogeneity and low study quality, a meta-analysis was not performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laser therapy improves symptoms/signs, QoL, and histological outcomes in VLS, with good safety and tolerability. However, the evidence supporting its use as a monotherapy is limited, and benefits for anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, scar-preventive, or anticarcinogenic effects remain unproven. Large-scale, long-term, and high-quality trials are needed, and future research should establish standardized Core Outcome and Measurement Sets to optimize VLS management.</p>","PeriodicalId":17961,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Laser Treatment in Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Dongmei Wei, Jian Meng, Qiao Li, Yajing Wang, Yueyue Chen, Xiaoyu Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lsm.70062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study systematically reviews randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating laser therapy for vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) to assess its efficacy and safety, aiming to inform clinical management and guideline development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RCTs on laser treatment for VLS were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to January 2025, limited to English literature. References from included studies were also screened. Data on study characteristics, laser parameters, outcome measures, measurement tools, and assessment time points were extracted and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs (332 patients) reported 19 outcomes and 19 measurement tools, each used a total of 28 times. Symptoms and signs were most frequently reported and commonly measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Most trials indicated improvements in symptoms, signs, quality of life (QoL), and histology after laser therapy. Three studies reported greater symptom/sign improvement than topical corticosteroids (p < 0.05), and three found higher patient satisfaction (p < 0.05). Two studies showed good tolerability via VAS. Adverse events occurred in five studies (147 patients), including five mild cases (local irritation, blisters, urinary tract infection, itching, and pain). Due to heterogeneity and low study quality, a meta-analysis was not performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laser therapy improves symptoms/signs, QoL, and histological outcomes in VLS, with good safety and tolerability. However, the evidence supporting its use as a monotherapy is limited, and benefits for anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, scar-preventive, or anticarcinogenic effects remain unproven. Large-scale, long-term, and high-quality trials are needed, and future research should establish standardized Core Outcome and Measurement Sets to optimize VLS management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.70062\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.70062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究系统回顾了评价激光治疗外阴硬化苔藓(VLS)的随机对照试验(rct),以评估其有效性和安全性,旨在为临床管理和指南制定提供信息。方法:从PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库中检索截至2025年1月的激光治疗VLS的随机对照试验,仅限于英文文献。纳入研究的参考文献也被筛选。提取和分析研究特征、激光参数、结果测量、测量工具和评估时间点的数据。结果:7项随机对照试验(332例患者)报告了19种结局和19种测量工具,每种工具共使用28次。症状和体征是最常报告的,通常使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行测量。大多数试验显示激光治疗后症状、体征、生活质量(QoL)和组织学改善。三个研究报告了比局部皮质类固醇更大的症状/体征改善(p结论:激光治疗改善了VLS的症状/体征、生活质量和组织学结果,具有良好的安全性和耐受性。然而,支持其作为单一疗法使用的证据是有限的,并且在抗炎、抗纤维化、疤痕预防或抗癌作用方面的益处仍未得到证实。需要大规模、长期和高质量的试验,未来的研究应建立标准化的核心结果和测量集,以优化VLS管理。
Efficacy and Safety of Laser Treatment in Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: A Systematic Review.
Objectives: This study systematically reviews randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating laser therapy for vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) to assess its efficacy and safety, aiming to inform clinical management and guideline development.
Methods: RCTs on laser treatment for VLS were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to January 2025, limited to English literature. References from included studies were also screened. Data on study characteristics, laser parameters, outcome measures, measurement tools, and assessment time points were extracted and analyzed.
Results: Seven RCTs (332 patients) reported 19 outcomes and 19 measurement tools, each used a total of 28 times. Symptoms and signs were most frequently reported and commonly measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Most trials indicated improvements in symptoms, signs, quality of life (QoL), and histology after laser therapy. Three studies reported greater symptom/sign improvement than topical corticosteroids (p < 0.05), and three found higher patient satisfaction (p < 0.05). Two studies showed good tolerability via VAS. Adverse events occurred in five studies (147 patients), including five mild cases (local irritation, blisters, urinary tract infection, itching, and pain). Due to heterogeneity and low study quality, a meta-analysis was not performed.
Conclusions: Laser therapy improves symptoms/signs, QoL, and histological outcomes in VLS, with good safety and tolerability. However, the evidence supporting its use as a monotherapy is limited, and benefits for anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, scar-preventive, or anticarcinogenic effects remain unproven. Large-scale, long-term, and high-quality trials are needed, and future research should establish standardized Core Outcome and Measurement Sets to optimize VLS management.
期刊介绍:
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine publishes the highest quality research and clinical manuscripts in areas relating to the use of lasers in medicine and biology. The journal publishes basic and clinical studies on the therapeutic and diagnostic use of lasers in all the surgical and medical specialties. Contributions regarding clinical trials, new therapeutic techniques or instrumentation, laser biophysics and bioengineering, photobiology and photochemistry, outcomes research, cost-effectiveness, and other aspects of biomedicine are welcome. Using a process of rigorous yet rapid review of submitted manuscripts, findings of high scientific and medical interest are published with a minimum delay.