基于短读ngs的卵菌群落鉴定引物的比较。

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Steven A. Wakelin , Charlotte Armstrong , Syaliny Ganasamurthy , Kathryn Wigley , Celine Mercier
{"title":"基于短读ngs的卵菌群落鉴定引物的比较。","authors":"Steven A. Wakelin ,&nbsp;Charlotte Armstrong ,&nbsp;Syaliny Ganasamurthy ,&nbsp;Kathryn Wigley ,&nbsp;Celine Mercier","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oomycetes have diverse ecological roles spanning threats to food security to vital contributors in nutrient cycling and biological control. Despite their importance, they are often overlooked in environmental microbiome studies. We evaluated several primer sets for their ability to characterize oomycete communities in eDNA samples. The ITS1/3oo primer set performed best among those evaluated in our single-protocol eDNA survey, returning high oomycete richness and broader taxonomic coverage; we note this reflects performance under our experimental conditions rather than an absolute, universally optimal primer. For broader eukarya coverage, the 18S rRNA primer set from the Earth Microbiome Programme outperformed the COI-based primers tested. Although these broad-coverage primer sets detected a wide range of oomycetes, their performance in oomycete-specific coverage was not as strong as oomycete-targeted primer sets. Evaluation of the primer sets were undertaken using eDNA samples collected from soil in which <em>Kunzea robusta</em> (kānuka; Myrtaceae), and <em>Phormium tenax</em> (harakeke; Asphodelaceae) were cultivated. An average of 52 and 54 oomycete ASVs, respectively, were associated with the rhizosphere of these plants, spanning <em>Haptoglossa, Alanopsis, Aphanomyces, Achyla, Pythium, Phytopythium, Globiosporangium, Phytophthora, Myzocytiopsis, Eurychasma</em> and <em>Lagendum</em> lineages. Based on evaluation of a range of oomycete targeting primers on real-world samples, we are able to provide recommendations for primer sets that maximise oomycete detection and provide the best balance of specificity and coverage for eDNA-based community profiling. These primers can be used to capture the diversity and ecological roles of oomycetes in natural and managed ecosystems, enabling more accurate assessments of their impact on plant health, soil and nutrient dynamics, as well as deepening our understanding of the diversity and distribution of this understudied clade of microbial life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 107293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of primer sets for short-read NGS-based characterisation of oomycete communities\",\"authors\":\"Steven A. Wakelin ,&nbsp;Charlotte Armstrong ,&nbsp;Syaliny Ganasamurthy ,&nbsp;Kathryn Wigley ,&nbsp;Celine Mercier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Oomycetes have diverse ecological roles spanning threats to food security to vital contributors in nutrient cycling and biological control. Despite their importance, they are often overlooked in environmental microbiome studies. We evaluated several primer sets for their ability to characterize oomycete communities in eDNA samples. The ITS1/3oo primer set performed best among those evaluated in our single-protocol eDNA survey, returning high oomycete richness and broader taxonomic coverage; we note this reflects performance under our experimental conditions rather than an absolute, universally optimal primer. For broader eukarya coverage, the 18S rRNA primer set from the Earth Microbiome Programme outperformed the COI-based primers tested. Although these broad-coverage primer sets detected a wide range of oomycetes, their performance in oomycete-specific coverage was not as strong as oomycete-targeted primer sets. Evaluation of the primer sets were undertaken using eDNA samples collected from soil in which <em>Kunzea robusta</em> (kānuka; Myrtaceae), and <em>Phormium tenax</em> (harakeke; Asphodelaceae) were cultivated. An average of 52 and 54 oomycete ASVs, respectively, were associated with the rhizosphere of these plants, spanning <em>Haptoglossa, Alanopsis, Aphanomyces, Achyla, Pythium, Phytopythium, Globiosporangium, Phytophthora, Myzocytiopsis, Eurychasma</em> and <em>Lagendum</em> lineages. Based on evaluation of a range of oomycete targeting primers on real-world samples, we are able to provide recommendations for primer sets that maximise oomycete detection and provide the best balance of specificity and coverage for eDNA-based community profiling. These primers can be used to capture the diversity and ecological roles of oomycetes in natural and managed ecosystems, enabling more accurate assessments of their impact on plant health, soil and nutrient dynamics, as well as deepening our understanding of the diversity and distribution of this understudied clade of microbial life.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"volume\":\"239 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016770122500209X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016770122500209X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卵菌具有多种生态作用,从对粮食安全的威胁到对养分循环和生物防治的重要贡献。尽管它们很重要,但它们在环境微生物组研究中经常被忽视。我们评估了几种引物组在eDNA样品中表征卵菌群落的能力。在我们的单协议eDNA调查中,its1 / 300引物组表现最好,返回高卵菌丰富度和更广泛的分类覆盖;我们注意到,这反映了在我们的实验条件下的性能,而不是绝对的,普遍最佳的引物。对于更广泛的真核生物覆盖,来自地球微生物组计划的18S rRNA引物组优于基于coi的引物。虽然这些广泛覆盖的引物可以检测到广泛的卵菌,但它们在卵菌特异性覆盖方面的表现不如卵菌靶向引物那么强。利用从种植Kunzea robusta (kānuka; myrtacae)和Phormium tenax (harakeke; Asphodelaceae)的土壤中收集的eDNA样本对引物进行评估。与这些植物根际相关的卵菌asv平均分别为52个和54个,跨越了Haptoglossa、Alanopsis、Aphanomyces、Achyla、Pythium、Phytopythium、Globiosporangium、Phytophthora、Myzocytiopsis、Eurychasma和lagatum谱系。基于对现实世界样品上一系列卵霉菌靶向引物的评估,我们能够提供引物集的建议,这些引物集可以最大限度地检测卵霉菌,并为基于edna的群落分析提供特异性和覆盖率的最佳平衡。这些引物可用于捕获自然和管理生态系统中卵菌的多样性和生态作用,从而更准确地评估它们对植物健康、土壤和营养动态的影响,并加深我们对这一尚未被研究的微生物生命分支的多样性和分布的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of primer sets for short-read NGS-based characterisation of oomycete communities
Oomycetes have diverse ecological roles spanning threats to food security to vital contributors in nutrient cycling and biological control. Despite their importance, they are often overlooked in environmental microbiome studies. We evaluated several primer sets for their ability to characterize oomycete communities in eDNA samples. The ITS1/3oo primer set performed best among those evaluated in our single-protocol eDNA survey, returning high oomycete richness and broader taxonomic coverage; we note this reflects performance under our experimental conditions rather than an absolute, universally optimal primer. For broader eukarya coverage, the 18S rRNA primer set from the Earth Microbiome Programme outperformed the COI-based primers tested. Although these broad-coverage primer sets detected a wide range of oomycetes, their performance in oomycete-specific coverage was not as strong as oomycete-targeted primer sets. Evaluation of the primer sets were undertaken using eDNA samples collected from soil in which Kunzea robusta (kānuka; Myrtaceae), and Phormium tenax (harakeke; Asphodelaceae) were cultivated. An average of 52 and 54 oomycete ASVs, respectively, were associated with the rhizosphere of these plants, spanning Haptoglossa, Alanopsis, Aphanomyces, Achyla, Pythium, Phytopythium, Globiosporangium, Phytophthora, Myzocytiopsis, Eurychasma and Lagendum lineages. Based on evaluation of a range of oomycete targeting primers on real-world samples, we are able to provide recommendations for primer sets that maximise oomycete detection and provide the best balance of specificity and coverage for eDNA-based community profiling. These primers can be used to capture the diversity and ecological roles of oomycetes in natural and managed ecosystems, enabling more accurate assessments of their impact on plant health, soil and nutrient dynamics, as well as deepening our understanding of the diversity and distribution of this understudied clade of microbial life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of microbiological methods
Journal of microbiological methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach. All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信