术前脑部绘图预测雄辩肿瘤切除后的语言结果。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Matthew T. Muir, Kyle Noll, Sarah Prinsloo, Hayley Michener, Jeffrey I. Traylor, Vinodh A. Kumar, Chibawanye I. Ene, Sherise Ferguson, Ho-Ling Liu, Jeffrey S. Weinberg, Frederick Lang, Brian A. Taylor, Stephanie J. Forkel, Sujit S. Prabhu
{"title":"术前脑部绘图预测雄辩肿瘤切除后的语言结果。","authors":"Matthew T. Muir,&nbsp;Kyle Noll,&nbsp;Sarah Prinsloo,&nbsp;Hayley Michener,&nbsp;Jeffrey I. Traylor,&nbsp;Vinodh A. Kumar,&nbsp;Chibawanye I. Ene,&nbsp;Sherise Ferguson,&nbsp;Ho-Ling Liu,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Weinberg,&nbsp;Frederick Lang,&nbsp;Brian A. Taylor,&nbsp;Stephanie J. Forkel,&nbsp;Sujit S. Prabhu","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When operating on gliomas near critical language regions, surgeons risk either leaving residual tumor or inducing permanent postoperative language deficits (PLDs). Despite the advent of intraoperative mapping techniques, subjective judgments frequently determine important surgical decisions. We aim to inform data-driven surgery by constructing a non-invasive mapping approach that quantitatively predicts the impact of individual surgical decisions on long-term language function. This study included 79 consecutive patients undergoing resection of language-eloquent gliomas. Patients underwent preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) language mapping to identify language-positive sites (“TMS points”) and their associated white matter tracts (“TMS tracts”) as well as formal language evaluations pre-and postoperatively. The resection of regions identified by preoperative mapping was correlated with permanent postoperative language deficits (PLDs). Resected tract segments (RTS) were normalized to MNI space for comparison with normative data. The resection of TMS points did not predict PLDs. However, a TMS point subgroup defined by white matter connectivity significantly predicted PLDs (OR = 8.74, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and demonstrated a canonical distribution of cortical language sites at a group level. TMS tracts recapitulated normative patterns of white matter connectivity defined by the Human Connectome Project. Subcortical resection of TMS tracts predicted PLDs independently of cortical resection (OR = 60, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In patients with PLDs, RTS showed significantly stronger co-localization with normative language-associated tracts compared to RTS in patients without PLDs (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Resecting patient-specific co-localizations between TMS tracts and normative tracts in native space predicted PLDs with an accuracy of 94% (OR = 134, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Prospective application of this data in a patient with glioblastoma precisely predicted the results of intraoperative language mapping with direct subcortical stimulation. Long-term postoperative language deficits result from resecting patient-specific white matter segments. We integrate these findings into a personalized tool that uses TMS language mappings, diffusion tractography, and population-level connectivity to preoperatively predict the long-term linguistic impact of individual surgical decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative Brain Mapping Predicts Language Outcomes After Eloquent Tumor Resection\",\"authors\":\"Matthew T. Muir,&nbsp;Kyle Noll,&nbsp;Sarah Prinsloo,&nbsp;Hayley Michener,&nbsp;Jeffrey I. Traylor,&nbsp;Vinodh A. Kumar,&nbsp;Chibawanye I. Ene,&nbsp;Sherise Ferguson,&nbsp;Ho-Ling Liu,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Weinberg,&nbsp;Frederick Lang,&nbsp;Brian A. Taylor,&nbsp;Stephanie J. Forkel,&nbsp;Sujit S. Prabhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.70340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>When operating on gliomas near critical language regions, surgeons risk either leaving residual tumor or inducing permanent postoperative language deficits (PLDs). Despite the advent of intraoperative mapping techniques, subjective judgments frequently determine important surgical decisions. We aim to inform data-driven surgery by constructing a non-invasive mapping approach that quantitatively predicts the impact of individual surgical decisions on long-term language function. This study included 79 consecutive patients undergoing resection of language-eloquent gliomas. Patients underwent preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) language mapping to identify language-positive sites (“TMS points”) and their associated white matter tracts (“TMS tracts”) as well as formal language evaluations pre-and postoperatively. The resection of regions identified by preoperative mapping was correlated with permanent postoperative language deficits (PLDs). Resected tract segments (RTS) were normalized to MNI space for comparison with normative data. The resection of TMS points did not predict PLDs. However, a TMS point subgroup defined by white matter connectivity significantly predicted PLDs (OR = 8.74, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and demonstrated a canonical distribution of cortical language sites at a group level. TMS tracts recapitulated normative patterns of white matter connectivity defined by the Human Connectome Project. Subcortical resection of TMS tracts predicted PLDs independently of cortical resection (OR = 60, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In patients with PLDs, RTS showed significantly stronger co-localization with normative language-associated tracts compared to RTS in patients without PLDs (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Resecting patient-specific co-localizations between TMS tracts and normative tracts in native space predicted PLDs with an accuracy of 94% (OR = 134, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Prospective application of this data in a patient with glioblastoma precisely predicted the results of intraoperative language mapping with direct subcortical stimulation. Long-term postoperative language deficits result from resecting patient-specific white matter segments. We integrate these findings into a personalized tool that uses TMS language mappings, diffusion tractography, and population-level connectivity to preoperatively predict the long-term linguistic impact of individual surgical decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":\"46 15\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529647/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70340\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当手术在关键语言区域附近的胶质瘤时,外科医生可能会留下残留的肿瘤或引起永久性的术后语言缺陷(PLDs)。尽管术中定位技术的出现,主观判断经常决定重要的手术决定。我们的目标是通过构建一种非侵入性映射方法来定量预测个体手术决策对长期语言功能的影响,从而为数据驱动的手术提供信息。这项研究包括79名连续接受语言雄辩胶质瘤切除术的患者。患者术前接受导航经颅磁刺激(TMS)语言映射,以确定语言阳性位点(“TMS点”)及其相关的白质束(“TMS束”),以及术前和术后的正式语言评估。术前定位识别的区域切除与术后永久性语言缺陷(PLDs)相关。将切除的束段(RTS)归一化为MNI空间,以便与规范数据进行比较。切除TMS点不能预测PLDs。然而,由白质连通性定义的TMS点亚组显著预测PLDs (OR = 8.74, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Preoperative Brain Mapping Predicts Language Outcomes After Eloquent Tumor Resection

Preoperative Brain Mapping Predicts Language Outcomes After Eloquent Tumor Resection

When operating on gliomas near critical language regions, surgeons risk either leaving residual tumor or inducing permanent postoperative language deficits (PLDs). Despite the advent of intraoperative mapping techniques, subjective judgments frequently determine important surgical decisions. We aim to inform data-driven surgery by constructing a non-invasive mapping approach that quantitatively predicts the impact of individual surgical decisions on long-term language function. This study included 79 consecutive patients undergoing resection of language-eloquent gliomas. Patients underwent preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) language mapping to identify language-positive sites (“TMS points”) and their associated white matter tracts (“TMS tracts”) as well as formal language evaluations pre-and postoperatively. The resection of regions identified by preoperative mapping was correlated with permanent postoperative language deficits (PLDs). Resected tract segments (RTS) were normalized to MNI space for comparison with normative data. The resection of TMS points did not predict PLDs. However, a TMS point subgroup defined by white matter connectivity significantly predicted PLDs (OR = 8.74, p < 0.01) and demonstrated a canonical distribution of cortical language sites at a group level. TMS tracts recapitulated normative patterns of white matter connectivity defined by the Human Connectome Project. Subcortical resection of TMS tracts predicted PLDs independently of cortical resection (OR = 60, p < 0.001). In patients with PLDs, RTS showed significantly stronger co-localization with normative language-associated tracts compared to RTS in patients without PLDs (p < 0.05). Resecting patient-specific co-localizations between TMS tracts and normative tracts in native space predicted PLDs with an accuracy of 94% (OR = 134, p < 0.001). Prospective application of this data in a patient with glioblastoma precisely predicted the results of intraoperative language mapping with direct subcortical stimulation. Long-term postoperative language deficits result from resecting patient-specific white matter segments. We integrate these findings into a personalized tool that uses TMS language mappings, diffusion tractography, and population-level connectivity to preoperatively predict the long-term linguistic impact of individual surgical decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信