双束起搏:一种新的多点左导系统心脏再同步起搏方法。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Marek Jastrzębski, Aleksander Kusiak, Darius Chapman, Marek Rajzer, Pughazendhi Vijayaraman, Agnieszka Bednarek
{"title":"双束起搏:一种新的多点左导系统心脏再同步起搏方法。","authors":"Marek Jastrzębski, Aleksander Kusiak, Darius Chapman, Marek Rajzer, Pughazendhi Vijayaraman, Agnieszka Bednarek","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.10.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pacing a single fascicle of the left bundle branch leads to a delay of the segments served by the contralateral fascicle. Bifascicular (BiF) pacing may offer better cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than left inferior fascicle (LIF) or left superior fascicle (LSF) pacing alone.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare synchrony between BiF and single fascicle pacing and present the procedural, clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic outcomes in CRT candidates who received BiF pacing METHODS: The following parameters were investigated to assess acute differences in electrical and mechanical synchrony: paced QRS duration and QRS area, global R-wave peak time (RWPT) and dV/dt time in lateral leads (I, aVL and V6), global longitudinal strain (GLS), peak strain dispersion (PSD) and global work efficiency (GWE). All measurements were performed during BiF, LIF and LSF pacing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>28 CRT candidates (age: 74.6 ±12.2 years; 36% female; LVEF = 37.2% ±10.6%) received BiF pacing. Compared to single fascicle pacing, BiF pacing resulted in significantly shorter QRS duration, lower QRS area, shorter global RWPT, shorter global dV/dt time, higher GLS and GWE, and lower PSD; no differences were observed between LIF and LSF pacing with respect to these parameters. Lead I dV/dt time and lead I RWPT correlated with mechanical dyssynchrony, especially with PSD (r = 0.79 and r = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BiF pacing is a novel physiological pacing method that more completely recruits the left conduction system. Compared to single fascicle pacing, it improves electrical and mechanical synchrony, potentially translating to superior clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bifascicular pacing: a novel multipoint left conduction system pacing method for cardiac resynchronization.\",\"authors\":\"Marek Jastrzębski, Aleksander Kusiak, Darius Chapman, Marek Rajzer, Pughazendhi Vijayaraman, Agnieszka Bednarek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.10.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pacing a single fascicle of the left bundle branch leads to a delay of the segments served by the contralateral fascicle. Bifascicular (BiF) pacing may offer better cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than left inferior fascicle (LIF) or left superior fascicle (LSF) pacing alone.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare synchrony between BiF and single fascicle pacing and present the procedural, clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic outcomes in CRT candidates who received BiF pacing METHODS: The following parameters were investigated to assess acute differences in electrical and mechanical synchrony: paced QRS duration and QRS area, global R-wave peak time (RWPT) and dV/dt time in lateral leads (I, aVL and V6), global longitudinal strain (GLS), peak strain dispersion (PSD) and global work efficiency (GWE). All measurements were performed during BiF, LIF and LSF pacing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>28 CRT candidates (age: 74.6 ±12.2 years; 36% female; LVEF = 37.2% ±10.6%) received BiF pacing. Compared to single fascicle pacing, BiF pacing resulted in significantly shorter QRS duration, lower QRS area, shorter global RWPT, shorter global dV/dt time, higher GLS and GWE, and lower PSD; no differences were observed between LIF and LSF pacing with respect to these parameters. Lead I dV/dt time and lead I RWPT correlated with mechanical dyssynchrony, especially with PSD (r = 0.79 and r = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BiF pacing is a novel physiological pacing method that more completely recruits the left conduction system. Compared to single fascicle pacing, it improves electrical and mechanical synchrony, potentially translating to superior clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.10.020\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.10.020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左束支单个神经束起搏导致对侧神经束所服务的神经段延迟。双束起搏(BiF)可能比单独的左下束起搏(LIF)或左上束起搏(LSF)提供更好的心脏再同步治疗(CRT)。目的:比较BiF和单束起搏的同步性,并介绍接受BiF起搏的CRT患者的程序、临床、心电图和超声心动图结果。方法:研究以下参数以评估电和机械同步性的急性差异:QRS持续时间和QRS面积、横向导联(I、aVL和V6)整体r波峰值时间(RWPT)和dV/dt时间、整体纵向应变(GLS)、峰值应变频散(PSD)和整体工作效率(GWE)。所有测量均在BiF、LIF和LSF起搏期间进行。结果:28例(年龄74.6±12.2岁,女性36%,LVEF = 37.2%±10.6%)接受BiF起搏。与单束起搏相比,BiF起搏导致QRS持续时间显著缩短、QRS面积显著减小、整体RWPT显著缩短、整体dV/dt显著缩短、GLS和GWE显著升高、PSD显著降低;在这些参数方面,LIF和LSF起搏没有观察到差异。导联dV/dt时间和导联RWPT与机械不同步相关,尤其是与PSD相关(r = 0.79和r = 0.67)。结论:BiF起搏是一种更充分调动左脑传导系统的新型生理起搏方法。与单束起搏相比,它改善了电和机械同步,潜在地转化为更好的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bifascicular pacing: a novel multipoint left conduction system pacing method for cardiac resynchronization.

Background: Pacing a single fascicle of the left bundle branch leads to a delay of the segments served by the contralateral fascicle. Bifascicular (BiF) pacing may offer better cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than left inferior fascicle (LIF) or left superior fascicle (LSF) pacing alone.

Objective: To compare synchrony between BiF and single fascicle pacing and present the procedural, clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic outcomes in CRT candidates who received BiF pacing METHODS: The following parameters were investigated to assess acute differences in electrical and mechanical synchrony: paced QRS duration and QRS area, global R-wave peak time (RWPT) and dV/dt time in lateral leads (I, aVL and V6), global longitudinal strain (GLS), peak strain dispersion (PSD) and global work efficiency (GWE). All measurements were performed during BiF, LIF and LSF pacing.

Results: 28 CRT candidates (age: 74.6 ±12.2 years; 36% female; LVEF = 37.2% ±10.6%) received BiF pacing. Compared to single fascicle pacing, BiF pacing resulted in significantly shorter QRS duration, lower QRS area, shorter global RWPT, shorter global dV/dt time, higher GLS and GWE, and lower PSD; no differences were observed between LIF and LSF pacing with respect to these parameters. Lead I dV/dt time and lead I RWPT correlated with mechanical dyssynchrony, especially with PSD (r = 0.79 and r = 0.67).

Conclusion: BiF pacing is a novel physiological pacing method that more completely recruits the left conduction system. Compared to single fascicle pacing, it improves electrical and mechanical synchrony, potentially translating to superior clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信