{"title":"超声引导下腋窝淋巴结细针穿刺细胞学在乳腺癌治疗中的临床应用及局限性。","authors":"Aoi Morishita, Tomoyuki Shimada","doi":"10.1002/dc.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate axillary staging is critical for selecting appropriate treatment strategies in breast cancer. Ultrasound (US) and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (US + FNAC) are widely used to evaluate axillary lymph nodes. The study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of US and US + FNAC and examined whether axillary dissection (AD) is necessary in patients with positive US + FNAC findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 646 axillae from 642 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery at Hiraka General Hospital between 2013 and 2024. All patients underwent axillary US, and US + FNAC was performed on morphologically suspicious nodes. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of US and US + FNAC were determined using postoperative pathology as the reference standard. The number of nodal metastases was compared between patients undergoing primary surgery and those receiving primary systemic therapy (PST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the primary surgery group (n = 516), US sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 30.9% (38/123), 94.1% (370/393), 62.3% (38/61), and 81.3% (370/455), respectively. Corresponding values for US + FNAC were 80.6% (29/36), 100% (22/22), 100% (29/29), and 75.9% (22/29). US + FNAC showed significantly higher sensitivity and PPV than US alone. Among US + FNAC-positive cases, 55.2% (16/29) had ≥ 3 metastatic nodes, compared with 6.9% (2/29) of negative cases. In the PST group (n = 130), US sensitivity was ≤ 88.1% (37/42), and US + FNAC sensitivity was ≤ 92.6% (25/27). Of the 46 US + FNAC-positive patients, 45.7% (21/46) became node-negative after PST, whereas 26.1% (12/46) had ≥ 3 positive nodes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US + FNAC improves diagnostic accuracy for axillary staging; however, standard AD may constitute overtreatment in some FNAC-positive patients. Selective de-escalation of axillary surgery should therefore be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Utility and Limitations of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Lymph Node Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in Breast Cancer Management.\",\"authors\":\"Aoi Morishita, Tomoyuki Shimada\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dc.70032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate axillary staging is critical for selecting appropriate treatment strategies in breast cancer. Ultrasound (US) and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (US + FNAC) are widely used to evaluate axillary lymph nodes. The study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of US and US + FNAC and examined whether axillary dissection (AD) is necessary in patients with positive US + FNAC findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 646 axillae from 642 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery at Hiraka General Hospital between 2013 and 2024. All patients underwent axillary US, and US + FNAC was performed on morphologically suspicious nodes. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of US and US + FNAC were determined using postoperative pathology as the reference standard. The number of nodal metastases was compared between patients undergoing primary surgery and those receiving primary systemic therapy (PST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the primary surgery group (n = 516), US sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 30.9% (38/123), 94.1% (370/393), 62.3% (38/61), and 81.3% (370/455), respectively. Corresponding values for US + FNAC were 80.6% (29/36), 100% (22/22), 100% (29/29), and 75.9% (22/29). US + FNAC showed significantly higher sensitivity and PPV than US alone. Among US + FNAC-positive cases, 55.2% (16/29) had ≥ 3 metastatic nodes, compared with 6.9% (2/29) of negative cases. In the PST group (n = 130), US sensitivity was ≤ 88.1% (37/42), and US + FNAC sensitivity was ≤ 92.6% (25/27). Of the 46 US + FNAC-positive patients, 45.7% (21/46) became node-negative after PST, whereas 26.1% (12/46) had ≥ 3 positive nodes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US + FNAC improves diagnostic accuracy for axillary staging; however, standard AD may constitute overtreatment in some FNAC-positive patients. Selective de-escalation of axillary surgery should therefore be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.70032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.70032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Utility and Limitations of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Lymph Node Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in Breast Cancer Management.
Background: Accurate axillary staging is critical for selecting appropriate treatment strategies in breast cancer. Ultrasound (US) and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (US + FNAC) are widely used to evaluate axillary lymph nodes. The study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of US and US + FNAC and examined whether axillary dissection (AD) is necessary in patients with positive US + FNAC findings.
Methods: We analyzed 646 axillae from 642 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery at Hiraka General Hospital between 2013 and 2024. All patients underwent axillary US, and US + FNAC was performed on morphologically suspicious nodes. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of US and US + FNAC were determined using postoperative pathology as the reference standard. The number of nodal metastases was compared between patients undergoing primary surgery and those receiving primary systemic therapy (PST).
Results: In the primary surgery group (n = 516), US sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 30.9% (38/123), 94.1% (370/393), 62.3% (38/61), and 81.3% (370/455), respectively. Corresponding values for US + FNAC were 80.6% (29/36), 100% (22/22), 100% (29/29), and 75.9% (22/29). US + FNAC showed significantly higher sensitivity and PPV than US alone. Among US + FNAC-positive cases, 55.2% (16/29) had ≥ 3 metastatic nodes, compared with 6.9% (2/29) of negative cases. In the PST group (n = 130), US sensitivity was ≤ 88.1% (37/42), and US + FNAC sensitivity was ≤ 92.6% (25/27). Of the 46 US + FNAC-positive patients, 45.7% (21/46) became node-negative after PST, whereas 26.1% (12/46) had ≥ 3 positive nodes.
Conclusion: US + FNAC improves diagnostic accuracy for axillary staging; however, standard AD may constitute overtreatment in some FNAC-positive patients. Selective de-escalation of axillary surgery should therefore be considered.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Cytopathology is intended to provide a forum for the exchange of information in the field of cytopathology, with special emphasis on the practical, clinical aspects of the discipline. The editors invite original scientific articles, as well as special review articles, feature articles, and letters to the editor, from laboratory professionals engaged in the practice of cytopathology. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the basis of scientific merit, practical significance, and suitability for publication in a journal dedicated to this discipline. Original articles can be considered only with the understanding that they have never been published before and that they have not been submitted for simultaneous review to another publication.